Thread: How Feminism has Backfired leaving a generation of spinsters

Originally Posted by SiliconMagician

Men are very simple. We don't require all the emotional gratification that women do. We simply don't care about most of that stuff. We can provide it for ourselves.

This suggests the emotional aspect of your sexual liasons is of no consequence, in which case you're banging either blowup dolls or women who serve the same purpose from your perspective. Have I got that about right?

Originally Posted by yguy

This suggests the emotional aspect of your sexual liasons is of no consequence, in which case you're banging either blowup dolls or women who serve the same purpose from your perspective. Have I got that about right?

Man, come into the modern day. What do you think the "hook up culture" is all about? Certainly not about emotional gratification. Women don't want any emotional attachment anymore than men do until they suddenly hit 30 and that biological clock goes "tick tick tick" by then it's too late because most men in their 30's are just hitting their sexual prime and banging chicks at least 5-8 years younger.

Feminism created the Hook up culture. Why not take full advantage of it?

Its quite simple. Apply a specific set of positive emotional and physical stimuli that are specifically proven to excite the mating instincts in women and get your game on. Then kick them out at 4am with cab fare and leave them to deal with the emotional consquences of their actions. Me? I fall blisfully asleep and never think twice. Buyer's Remorse is for women, not men.

Originally Posted by SiliconMagician

Buyer's Remorse is for women, not men.

Boy, are you in for a surprise.

While feminism has done right by professional women seeking careers, that simply isn't the majority of women. As long as a man can turn off true feelings for a woman outside of sex and make sure not to get one pregnant, he can escape all the socially engineered trappings to enslave him to a woman. Even though right now it isn't the majority realization of men, it is the growing realization, and attitudes resembling that of the OP's will soon be the largest demographic. However, I would like to say even though I can honestly share in some of SM's perspective, it is hard not falling for some of them. One would have to be a psychopath. For most men with the ability to read between the lines, the only option is withdrawing from relations with women completely. Just as careerist females are the minority, so are men in Jaguars with homes in the Bahamas. It isn't SM or his father who will ever be screwed by this social fiasco, nor will it ever be Martha Stewart or Oprah. It is everyone else. From the males being trained to be unnaturally soft, to the females being trained to be unnaturally hard. No good will come of this in the long run.

However, on a side note. As a nationalist who wants his nation back. A man who wants to hang central planners. This is all the work of God, nature, yin yang, karma, etc. For unnatural programming must be a constant to remain effective, where what a human is naturally can be returned simply by removing said programming. And for the amount of blood that needs to be spilled in order to regain sovereignty from the global regime, a 100 million single men who haven't been laid in 10 years is just what the doctor ordered.

Originally Posted by Til the Last Drop

While feminism has done right by professional women seeking careers, that simply isn't the majority of women. As long as a man can turn off true feelings for a woman outside of sex and make sure not to get one pregnant, he can escape all the socially engineered trappings to enslave him to a woman. Even though right now it isn't the majority realization of men, it is the growing realization, and attitudes resembling that of the OP's will soon be the largest demographic. However, I would like to say even though I can honestly share in some of SM's perspective, it is hard not falling for some of them. One would have to be a psychopath. For most men with the ability to read between the lines, the only option is withdrawing from relations with women completely. Just as careerist females are the minority, so are men in Jaguars with homes in the Bahamas. It isn't SM or his father who will ever be screwed by this social fiasco, nor will it ever be Martha Stewart or Oprah. It is everyone else. From the males being trained to be unnaturally soft, to the females being trained to be unnaturally hard. No good will come of this in the long run.

However, on a side note. As a nationalist who wants his nation back. A man who wants to hang central planners. This is all the work of God, nature, yin yang, karma, etc. For unnatural programming must be a constant to remain effective, where what a human is naturally can be returned simply by removing said programming. And for the amount of blood that needs to be spilled in order to regain sovereignty from the global regime, a 100 million single men who haven't been laid in 10 years is just what the doctor ordered.

It doesn't take a psychopath. 40% of the American female population is morbidly obese. No man wants a fat pig for a wife. Out of the other 60% the top 20% of those will go to the rich and famous and powerful men, the elite.

So out of that remaining 40% of available women, how many are emotionally damaged goods, suffering from various psychological hangups that make them unattractive long term mates? 10%?

So we're talking about a mere 30% of all women are actually suitable for 80% of men.

Competition is stiff. This isn't psychopathy, it's cold hard mathematical fact. 70% of the female population is either undesirable for one reason or another, or unavailable to the common man. So that means, if a man wants to be happy he will have to either settle for a fat hog or enjoy a lifetime of cad bachelorhood, or sexless bachelorhood.

Since I have no desire to marry a fat hog, or settle into a life of sexless bachelorhood, I prefer being a cad.

Originally Posted by SiliconMagician

Enjoy your single mother spinsterhood because I can guarantee you I love the hell out of my single bachelorhood.

In other words what your trying to tell us is that you have historically been unable to maintain a committed relationship Thank you for sharing your experience and phobias with us.

SiliconMagician might be the only other person on this forum that understands the science behind how attraction works. All the PC libs are clueless. The women are bitter, old, and resentful, and the "men" (if you can call them that) can't figure out why they keep getting stuck in the friend zone. I kind of feel bad for you guys, though. I remember when I used to believe what you believe. I didn't get it either.

Originally Posted by gamewell45

In other words what your trying to tell us is that you have historically been unable to maintain a committed relationship Thank you for sharing your experience and phobias with us.

Please. Feminists and their liberal allies create the "hook up culture" and obliterate the nuclear family. Then when men begin to adapt to it and abandon the responsibilities that patriarchy demanded of them in the same manner that women abandoned theirs. Suddenly he's a piece of dirt. He's "phobic" about commitment, a misogynist becuase he refuses to accept taking part in a society where all the responsibilities of patriarchy remain on his shoulders, but none of the benefits that patriarchy brought to him.

What a sick double standard. But then, Feminism and Liberalism in general are all about double standards. Freedom for me, but not for thee is the watch phrase of both Feminism and Liberalism.

We men will no longer be dominated by the legal institutions that the new matriarchy has attempted to foist upon us. We rebel.

Originally Posted by Unifier

SiliconMagician might be the only other person on this forum that understands the science behind how attraction works. All the PC libs are clueless. The women are bitter, old, and resentful, and the "men" (if you can call them that) can't figure out why they keep getting stuck in the friend zone. I kind of feel bad for you guys, though. I remember when I used to believe what you believe. I didn't get it either.

It's more than that. There is a growing movement among men who have realized that raw deal that feminism has attempted to deal them. The deal is that men are supposed to maintain all the responsiblities and domestic miseries that patriarchy demanded of him while recieving none of the legal or social security or safety that it brought to him.

This movement will not much longer be supressed. In the end we'll either be free, or dead. But we won't be enslaved. Learning the Science of attraction is but one piece of that movement.

Originally Posted by SiliconMagician

I also find it very very telling that the one fem who has the vagina to actually speak up, defends spinsterhood as a desirable outcome for most women. No real woman wants to become a spinster.

That is the difference between feminists and the rest of female-kind; feminists do not feel there is any need for a man! It is no coincidence that many feminists are also not even sexually attracted to men.