Thread: Why don't Feminists Condemn Bill Maher the #1 Misogynist?

Originally Posted by Libhater

Oh, that's right Missy, the one where you skated around the issue by not telling me why the femanazis didn't come down on libs like Maher or Bill Clinton, but were quick to excoriate Conservatives like Rush and Clarence Thomas with those fluke and Anita Hill episodes.

skirted?

Why don't Feminists Condemn Bill Maher the #1 Misogynist?

really?

as for Clarence and Anita? I was too young for that.. but I'm pretty people went crazy over that because he sexually harassed her.. different from Maher and different from Clinton since Monica wanted it and Anita didn't..

Personally, I believe that Bill Maher and John Stewart are extremist leftist political hacks in line with Rush Limbaugh and David Duke on the right hiding behind the auspices of "comedy". That being said, Bill Maher's comments do not threaten to remove government cheese from the pockets of women. Thus, it is not treated seriously.

Originally Posted by dudeman

Personally, I believe that Bill Maher and John Stewart are extremist leftist political hacks in line with Rush Limbaugh and David Duke on the right hiding behind the auspices of "comedy". That being said, Bill Maher's comments do not threaten to remove government cheese from the pockets of women. Thus, it is not treated seriously.

Not the point at all. Creeps like Palin and the Coulter critter threaten to remove some of the most basic human rights from women, in order to return them to the feudal-level status that they suffered until the twentieth century, lacking the right to control their own bodies or property and all that.

Feminist women and men who love strong, intelligent women have no use for the right wing harpies, either.