Thread: Could Feminists(and male suppporters) be Angry because they are ugly?

Originally Posted by Gwendoline

It doesn't matter how many threads are started here claiming feminists are every bad thing under the sun. It doesn't matter. Reality exists in the day to day of our lives. This section of the forum is completely out of touch with reality. And mostly comprises the sour bitter laments of sour bitter men.

You exaggerate, no one claims feminists to be responsible for famines in North Korea. They are responsible for their own misandrist agenda. There are too many bad things in the world to be caused by a few western feminists alone.

Feminists don't approach the kind of sexist men that post in this section.

Physically not (luckily!), but they approach men in their publications and books. They philosophize about their supposed reconcileablelessness of men with a modern world, painting men as a problem of pollution or crime or whatever. Usually thats the revenge of ugly fat women to whom the life was too hard.

And these feminists who don't approach these kind of men are articulate, intelligent, attractive women. My friends don't walk around talking about feminism all day, but they are feminists. And they are accomplished, successful, attractive, confident, happy women. And they are feminists.

How do you come to the idea they were feminists. If anyone of your attributes fit to your friends I seriously doubt that they could even be feminists.

The useless, immature descriptions of feminists here is pathetic and juvenile.

These descriptions are the result of what feminists write in their books, magazines and publications. Behind a bad camouflage of a so called equality between men and women they are fighting for a two class society with first class citizen and second class citizen.

At the end of the day, what's new? Not much, just the usual silly men here beating up on women for their own twisted, silly bitter reasons.

Beating up women? Only a small group of women are feminists. Just for the protocol, nobody of these persons would appreciate male feminists any more than female feminists.

Originally Posted by leftysergeant

Dude, did you notice we were comparing Alan Alda to the Rushblob. Alda has never been in trouble with the law, served honorably as an artillery officer in the Army Reserve and has managed to stay permanently married to the same beautiful and talented woamn for over fifty years. The Rushblob was busted for a felony, rode the sick list to get out of serving in Vietnam and hates women, but keeps marrying them juyst to prove he isn't a closet queer (and not convincing any of us who know what homosexuality is about) and getting discarded by women who can no longer deal with his sexual dysfunction.

Interesting that the so-called 'family values' crowd revere a disingenuous, un-family-like slug like Rush. Like attracts like, they say. "Show me the kind of person you like / admire and I'll tell you who you are." To praise a parasite like that is telling on these people.

In not liking Alda they reveal how anti-family they are. And how slimy grotty men are more their heroes. Meanwhile they crow about loose morals, gays and feminists, while revering the fattest slug on earth of slimey character. It's somewhat amazing to find people being drawn to a severely unhealthy unfit ugly slug like that. Perhaps these people want to emulate that level of bad health and unfitness. Or perhaps they already have that level of bad health and unfitness, in which case, they most likely rail against women because women are repulsed by them. I mean, Rush is the vilest looking thing, his obsession with things of a sexual nature when the fat slug can't even move cos he's so fat. That man is repulsiveness personified. And the Rush lovers complain about ugly feminists while revering the ugliest pig on earth. Very telling, methinks.

Originally Posted by Gwendoline

Interesting that the so-called 'family values' crowd revere a disingenuous, un-family-like slug like Rush. Like attracts like, they say. "Show me the kind of person you like / admire and I'll tell you who you are." To praise a parasite like that is telling on these people.

In not liking Alda they reveal how anti-family they are. And how slimy grotty men are more their heroes. Meanwhile they crow about loose morals, gays and feminists, while revering the fattest slug on earth of slimey character. It's somewhat amazing to find people being drawn to a severely unhealthy unfit ugly slug like that. Perhaps these people want to emulate that level of bad health and unfitness. Or perhaps they already have that level of bad health and unfitness, in which case, they most likely rail against women because women are repulsed by them. I mean, Rush is the vilest looking thing, his obsession with things of a sexual nature when the fat slug can't even move cos he's so fat. That man is repulsiveness personified. And the Rush lovers complain about ugly feminists while revering the ugliest pig on earth. Very telling, methinks.

Here, check out what Rush's hot wife has to say about Rush her cuddly man:

http://takemycountryback.com/rush-limbaughs-wife/

Originally Posted by Libhater

Here, check out what Rush's hot wife has to say about Rush her cuddly man:

http://takemycountryback.com/rush-limbaughs-wife/

The piece is a SATIRE. She didn't write it. But you knew that, right?

tmcbpatriot 1 comment collapsed
Collapse Expand Thanks for the comment. I love that some think it is really her writing. Maybe Rush will read it too and ask his wife why she went public like that.

Your hero is a mass of blubber and rolls of fat. You revere an unhealthy fat man. Doesn't say much for you.

Although I do not even know Limbaugh, what's so important about him? You may always argue about ugliness, as far as I am concerned I would instantaniously admit, he will not win a beauty contest. So what? I can understand if someone claims, he is ugly, so what? And if you convince me that he was an idiot, so what?

There may be a lot of antifeminists, who are idiots. If I give you an example of a stupid and ugly democrat will that be an evidence that democracy should be replaced by a dictator?

Originally Posted by Glücksritter

Although I do not even know Limbaugh, what's so important about him? You may always argue about ugliness, as far as I am concerned I would instantaniously admit, he will not win a beauty contest. So what? I can understand if someone claims, he is ugly, so what? And if you convince me that he was an idiot, so what?

There may be a lot of antifeminists, who are idiots. If I give you an example of a stupid and ugly democrat will that be an evidence that democracy should be replaced by a dictator?

Look up at the title of the thread. UGLINESS is the subject of this thread. I am pointing out that one of the most vocal dickheads calling feminists ugly is a fat ugly slug called Rush Limbaugh. He is a fat repulsive man that would put a woman off love and sex for life. He is the epitome of a Repulsive Male.

Originally Posted by Glücksritter

You exaggerate, no one claims feminists to be responsible for famines in North Korea. They are responsible for their own misandrist agenda. There are too many bad things in the world to be caused by a few western feminists alone.

Not so far-fetched. Didn't you see the threads claiming: “Feminists are making Americans fat”, or the thread titled: “Feminism means Genocide”. LOL. There are some serious nutters in this place.

Physically not (luckily!), but they approach men in their publications and books. They philosophize about their supposed reconcileablelessness of men with a modern world, painting men as a problem of pollution or crime or whatever. Usually thats the revenge of ugly fat women to whom the life was too hard.

No men out there positing vile positions regarding women in books and publications, huh? I mean, you should the sexist, misogynistic crap I have to put up with in this place!!

How do you come to the idea they were feminists. If anyone of your attributes fit to your friends I seriously doubt that they could even be feminists.

You don't know what feminism is.

These descriptions are the result of what feminists write in their books, magazines and publications. Behind a bad camouflage of a so called equality between men and women they are fighting for a two class society with first class citizen and second class citizen.

Post a thread about one of these publications. Might be a breath of fresh air / and may strike a balance to hear a woman rising up to MEET and MATCH the level of misogyny that is commonplace in this section of the forum.

Beating up women? Only a small group of women are feminists. Just for the protocol, nobody of these persons would appreciate male feminists any more than female feminists.

Like I said, you don't know what feminism is. Attributing it to a small group is pretty ridiculous and uninformed.

Originally Posted by Gwendoline

Like I said, you don't know what feminism is. Attributing it to a small group is pretty ridiculous and uninformed.

Whether attacking women or blacks, the right wing seems ate up with Dunning-Kruger syndrome.

Originally Posted by Gwendoline

Look up at the title of the thread. UGLINESS is the subject of this thread. I am pointing out that one of the most vocal dickheads calling feminists ugly is a fat ugly slug called Rush Limbaugh. He is a fat repulsive man that would put a woman off love and sex for life. He is the epitome of a Repulsive Male.

Anyway, he is just ONE example.

Originally Posted by Gwendoline

Not so far-fetched. Didn't you see the threads claiming: “Feminists are making Americans fat”, or the thread titled: “Feminism means Genocide”. LOL. There are some serious nutters in this place.

I do not know if feminism make Americans fat, more likely it is the fat which makes them fat.
Nevertheless a connection between ugliness and feminism is not an absurd thesis considering the relative numbers of ugly feminists. This does not mean that some anti-feminists can be ugly as well.

No men out there positing vile positions regarding women in books and publications, huh? I mean, you should the sexist, misogynistic crap I have to put up with in this place!!

Of course there are men who publish insulting theories or thesis about women, but what's the point? There are Indians who publish insulting books about Pakis, is that a sufficient evidence that there are no Pakis who publish insulting books about Indians?

You don't know what feminism is.

I know what feminism is, it's a simple label you can use to mask a misandrist political agenda. Because of the wide spreaded intolerance and the totalitarian attitude of many feminists two feminists themselves weren't able to agree on an exact definition and deny each other the right to call themselves feminists - a term that isn't protected by a copyright -, as you can distinguish between different ideas of feminism. Satre or Simone de Beauvoir would not agree with Valerie Soalanas who would not agree with Andrea Dworkin who would not agree with the former Zapatero government in Spain.

Post a thread about one of these publications. Might be a breath of fresh air / and may strike a balance to hear a woman rising up to MEET and MATCH the level of misogyny that is commonplace in this section of the forum.

Ok, here just a first trial:

SCUM

Like I said, you don't know what feminism is. Attributing it to a small group is pretty ridiculous and uninformed.

I don't state it's a small group in absolute numbers, but you cannot equate women with feminists cause the numbers of feminists are small relative to the number of women at all.

Yup. Them feminist celebrities sure is a ugly lot.