Thread: How can a Feminist File a Sexual Harassment Suit?

Originally Posted by Unifier

Yeah, it's called foreplay.

There have been dozens since I started working where I do.

Originally Posted by Libhater

What proper role for women, and who would I make miserable? I'm trying to make life easier for everyone by insisting we wipe out any and all frivolous sexual harassment cases.

Not a bit of it. A woman has the right to go to work and to be allowed to do her job without a bunch of men constantly trying to seduce her and making unkind remarks when she rebuffs them. I have worked in settings that were traditionally all male, like in a military mess hall, when women were first brought in in the same capacity as the men. No female soldier, especially a married one, wants half the shift paying more attention to her, with the goal of getting her to bed with them, than they pay to getting their products on the serving line. Without constant supervision of the male personnel, that is exactly what has happened in far too many cases. Too many men think that a woman's mere presence implies her sexual availability to them.

There is a good biological reason for allowing women the ultimate authority in matters of the males with whom she will or will not have sexual contact. The women bear the greatest consequences for the results of any sexual act, whether it is physical harm to her reproductive tract or being burdened with the health issues attendent upon even a nominally normal pregnancy. Repeated sexual advances by unwanted males is a burden that they would normally not want to bear in trhe workplace.

It will probably take several generations before men in general learn to accept that women are there for the same reason for which the men allegegly are, which is to earn a decent living doing an honest day's work.

A lot of men are still having trouble learning that their externally-stowed danglies do not make them automaticly more qualified for jkust about any of the work they have traditionally done in an all-male setting.

In a nutshell, until men like you get over yourselves, there will still be a need for sexual harrassment laws.

Originally Posted by leftysergeant

Not a bit of it. A woman has the right to go to work and to be allowed to do her job without a bunch of men constantly trying to seduce her and making unkind remarks when she rebuffs them. I have worked in settings that were traditionally all male, like in a military mess hall, when women were first brought in in the same capacity as the men. No female soldier, especially a married one, wants half the shift paying more attention to her, with the goal of getting her to bed with them, than they pay to getting their products on the serving line. Without constant supervision of the male personnel, that is exactly what has happened in far too many cases. Too many men think that a woman's mere presence implies her sexual availability to them.

There is a good biological reason for allowing women the ultimate authority in matters of the males with whom she will or will not have sexual contact. The women bear the greatest consequences for the results of any sexual act, whether it is physical harm to her reproductive tract or being burdened with the health issues attendent upon even a nominally normal pregnancy. Repeated sexual advances by unwanted males is a burden that they would normally not want to bear in trhe workplace.

It will probably take several generations before men in general learn to accept that women are there for the same reason for which the men allegegly are, which is to earn a decent living doing an honest day's work.

A lot of men are still having trouble learning that their externally-stowed danglies do not make them automaticly more qualified for jkust about any of the work they have traditionally done in an all-male setting.

In a nutshell, until men like you get over yourselves, there will still be a need for sexual harrassment laws.

So what I surmise from your response here is that you are rejecting the feminist mantra or the feminist belief that we're all equal, or that we're all suppose to be equal, or that we all could be equal in that we men just don't have what it takes to mind our manners around the female sex. I guess the saying "All-American red-blooded male" never applied to you, or that you never found the feminist female all that attractive in which to arouse a sexual interest. So be it.

Originally Posted by leftysergeant

Not a bit of it. A woman has the right to go to work and to be allowed to do her job without a bunch of men constantly trying to seduce her and making unkind remarks when she rebuffs them. I have worked in settings that were traditionally all male, like in a military mess hall, when women were first brought in in the same capacity as the men. No female soldier, especially a married one, wants half the shift paying more attention to her, with the goal of getting her to bed with them, than they pay to getting their products on the serving line. Without constant supervision of the male personnel, that is exactly what has happened in far too many cases. Too many men think that a woman's mere presence implies her sexual availability to them.

There is a good biological reason for allowing women the ultimate authority in matters of the males with whom she will or will not have sexual contact. The women bear the greatest consequences for the results of any sexual act, whether it is physical harm to her reproductive tract or being burdened with the health issues attendent upon even a nominally normal pregnancy. Repeated sexual advances by unwanted males is a burden that they would normally not want to bear in trhe workplace.

It will probably take several generations before men in general learn to accept that women are there for the same reason for which the men allegegly are, which is to earn a decent living doing an honest day's work.

A lot of men are still having trouble learning that their externally-stowed danglies do not make them automaticly more qualified for jkust about any of the work they have traditionally done in an all-male setting.

In a nutshell, until men like you get over yourselves, there will still be a need for sexual harrassment laws.

So what I surmise from your response here is that you are rejecting the feminist mantra or the feminist belief that we're all equal, or that we're all suppose to be equal, or that we all could be equal in that we men just don't have what it takes to mind our manners around the female sex. I guess the saying "All-American red-blooded male" never applied to you, or that you never found the feminist female all that attractive in which to arouse a sexual interest. I can understand that when it comes to sizing up the lesbo feminist So be it.

Originally Posted by Libhater

So what I surmise from your response here is that you are rejecting the feminist mantra or the feminist belief that we're all equal, or that we're all suppose to be equal, or that we all could be equal in that we men just don't have what it takes to mind our manners around the female sex.

Most real men have the sense to know that not every woman in their area of operations is there to be recreational equipment for the guys. Most of us accept that they are there to do somewhat the same things we are getting paid to do. Most of us know that we are not getting paid to get our jollies chasing women.

I guess the saying "All-American red-blooded male" never applied to you, or that you never found the feminist female all that attractive in which to arouse a sexual interest. I can understand that when it comes to sizing up the lesbo feminist So be it.

I have always had a preferrence for strong, self-confident and intelligent women who were still able to do something interesting after the grunting and clinging and sweating were over.

I have been married to the same woman for thirty years now. Most of the self-styled "real macho men" I know can't say that.

My son is the same way. Other guys trust him to take their girlfriends to events which they cannot attend (like the time he took a friend's girlfriend to her school's Prom because his friend was in Navy boot camp.) He expects his sons to be the same way.
You know, gentlemen. (Whatever happened to the rest of them?)