Thread: Disengenuous Feminism

Where was the Left, and where the Feminists, during President Clinton's savaging of Juanita Broaddrick, Genifer Flowers, Paul Jones, Susan McDougal, and Monica Lewinsky? These women, who suffered, if anyone has ever suffered, "workplace harassment," were dismissed from consideration by the Left, who mentioned their struggles not at all; and Monica Lewinsky, a Nice Jewish Girl from Brentwood, working as an intern in the office of the most powerful man on the planet, was treated to the silence of the feminists as she was accused, by her employer, the President of the United States, while he was committing perjury, of being unbalanced and, perhaps, of having had a "bad childhood." How, by the Left, can this be excused? It cannot. But it may be partially explained---Flowers, Jones et al., were dismissed by the Left not merely because they accused the Left's avatar, but because of their class. They were, to the Left, "trailer trash," and so, de-facto, undeserving of a hearing yet alone a defense.

The Feminists of the Left were voluble in their indictment of Justice Thomas, in Anita Hill's, at best, "he said, she said" controversy; using racial language and innuendo against him unheard in this country in decades.

They supported Tawana Brawley's improbable claims of rape up to, and, indeed, past the point at which they had been proved fraudulent and her testimony found perjured.

But what of the death of Mary Jo Kopechne by drowning? What Feminist spoke up for the dead victim? Or against the man who drove her to her death? He remained an icon of the Left for the rest of his life. Are those Feminists, then, spokespersons for the Rights of Women? Demonstrably not. They are not even spokeswomen for the rights of Liberal women--Ms. Kopechne was working for a Democrat, as was Ms. Lewinsky. They are advocates only of the positions of the Left--at whatever cost to women, what in the world are those people talking about?

Originally Posted by Libhater

Where was the Left, and where the Feminists, during President Clinton's savaging of Juanita Broaddrick, Genifer Flowers, Paul Jones, Susan McDougal, and Monica Lewinsky? These women, who suffered, if anyone has ever suffered, "workplace harassment," were dismissed from consideration by the Left, who mentioned their struggles not at all; and Monica Lewinsky, a Nice Jewish Girl from Brentwood, working as an intern in the office of the most powerful man on the planet, was treated to the silence of the feminists as she was accused, by her employer, the President of the United States, while he was committing perjury, of being unbalanced and, perhaps, of having had a "bad childhood." How, by the Left, can this be excused? It cannot. But it may be partially explained---Flowers, Jones et al., were dismissed by the Left not merely because they accused the Left's avatar, but because of their class. They were, to the Left, "trailer trash," and so, de-facto, undeserving of a hearing yet alone a defense.

The Feminists of the Left were voluble in their indictment of Justice Thomas, in Anita Hill's, at best, "he said, she said" controversy; using racial language and innuendo against him unheard in this country in decades.

They supported Tawana Brawley's improbable claims of rape up to, and, indeed, past the point at which they had been proved fraudulent and her testimony found perjured.

But what of the death of Mary Jo Kopechne by drowning? What Feminist spoke up for the dead victim? Or against the man who drove her to her death? He remained an icon of the Left for the rest of his life. Are those Feminists, then, spokespersons for the Rights of Women? Demonstrably not. They are not even spokeswomen for the rights of Liberal women--Ms. Kopechne was working for a Democrat, as was Ms. Lewinsky. They are advocates only of the positions of the Left--at whatever cost to women, what in the world are those people talking about?

Come on Gwen, you owe it to your fem sisters to make excuses for this terrible hsitory of your feminist sisterhood.

Originally Posted by Libhater

Where was the Left, and where the Feminists, during President Clinton's savaging of Juanita Broaddrick, Genifer Flowers, Paul Jones, Susan McDougal, and Monica Lewinsky? These women, who suffered, if anyone has ever suffered, "workplace harassment," were dismissed from consideration by the Left, who mentioned their struggles not at all; and Monica Lewinsky, a Nice Jewish Girl from Brentwood, working as an intern in the office of the most powerful man on the planet, was treated to the silence of the feminists as she was accused, by her employer, the President of the United States, while he was committing perjury, of being unbalanced and, perhaps, of having had a "bad childhood." How, by the Left, can this be excused? It cannot. But it may be partially explained---Flowers, Jones et al., were dismissed by the Left not merely because they accused the Left's avatar, but because of their class. They were, to the Left, "trailer trash," and so, de-facto, undeserving of a hearing yet alone a defense.

The Feminists of the Left were voluble in their indictment of Justice Thomas, in Anita Hill's, at best, "he said, she said" controversy; using racial language and innuendo against him unheard in this country in decades.

They supported Tawana Brawley's improbable claims of rape up to, and, indeed, past the point at which they had been proved fraudulent and her testimony found perjured.

But what of the death of Mary Jo Kopechne by drowning? What Feminist spoke up for the dead victim? Or against the man who drove her to her death? He remained an icon of the Left for the rest of his life. Are those Feminists, then, spokespersons for the Rights of Women? Demonstrably not. They are not even spokeswomen for the rights of Liberal women--Ms. Kopechne was working for a Democrat, as was Ms. Lewinsky. They are advocates only of the positions of the Left--at whatever cost to women, what in the world are those people talking about?

All of these things are why Andrew Breitbart became a conservative. He had been a liberal his whole life and eventually reached a point where he couldn't ignore the hypocrisy anymore. And he changed his views.

Originally Posted by Unifier

All of these things are why Andrew Breitbart became a conservative. He had been a liberal his whole life and eventually reached a point where he couldn't ignore the hypocrisy anymore. And he changed his views.

I didn't know that about Andrew. Thanks for the update. Even our greatest 20th century president Ronald Reagan started off as a liberal before coming to his senses. Something about that Hollywood gang of liberalism and loose morales just stinks up the atmosphere.

Originally Posted by Libhater

I didn't know that about Andrew. Thanks for the update. Even our greatest 20th century president Ronald Reagan started off as a liberal before coming to his senses. Something about that Hollywood gang of liberalism and loose morales just stinks up the atmosphere. There are some now that are suggesting we call all Democrats...Hypocrats so as to give an accurate description of their politics.

.............

Originally Posted by Libhater

Where was the Left, and where the Feminists, during President Clinton's savaging of Juanita Broaddrick, Genifer Flowers, Paul Jones, Susan McDougal, and Monica Lewinsky? These women, who suffered, if anyone has ever suffered, "workplace harassment," were dismissed from consideration by the Left, who mentioned their struggles not at all; and Monica Lewinsky, a Nice Jewish Girl from Brentwood, working as an intern in the office of the most powerful man on the planet, was treated to the silence of the feminists as she was accused, by her employer, the President of the United States, while he was committing perjury, of being unbalanced and, perhaps, of having had a "bad childhood." How, by the Left, can this be excused? It cannot. But it may be partially explained---Flowers, Jones et al., were dismissed by the Left not merely because they accused the Left's avatar, but because of their class. They were, to the Left, "trailer trash," and so, de-facto, undeserving of a hearing yet alone a defense.

The Feminists of the Left were voluble in their indictment of Justice Thomas, in Anita Hill's, at best, "he said, she said" controversy; using racial language and innuendo against him unheard in this country in decades.

They supported Tawana Brawley's improbable claims of rape up to, and, indeed, past the point at which they had been proved fraudulent and her testimony found perjured.

But what of the death of Mary Jo Kopechne by drowning? What Feminist spoke up for the dead victim? Or against the man who drove her to her death? He remained an icon of the Left for the rest of his life. Are those Feminists, then, spokespersons for the Rights of Women? Demonstrably not. They are not even spokeswomen for the rights of Liberal women--Ms. Kopechne was working for a Democrat, as was Ms. Lewinsky. They are advocates only of the positions of the Left--at whatever cost to women, what in the world are those people talking about?

Yes, yes, disingenuous feminism.... says the man who doesn't want women to vote and reveres a misogynistic fat slug. My, your petticoat is showing there...


By your analogies, that means that:

If a woman does wrong things, you will not hold the woman accountable and responsible for her actions - but you will hold responsible the men who did not speak out for the male victimised / abused by the woman. That’s how your storybook goes, right? It won’t be the woman doing bad things that you will hold accountable, but you will hold accountable the men who didn’t speak out for the male victim of the woman’s victimisation and abuse. My, that’s an interesting way you think.

My advice to you: Find a nice conservative anti-feminst woman who doesn't want to vote because she doesn't think she deserves to because she has low self esteem and is as dumb as two floor boards... and be happy, libhater.

Originally Posted by Gwendoline

Yes, yes, disingenuous feminism.... says the man who doesn't want women to vote and reveres a misogynistic fat slug. My, your petticoat is showing there...


By your analogies, that means that:

If a woman does wrong things, you will not hold the woman accountable and responsible for her actions - but you will hold responsible the men who did not speak out for the male victimised / abused by the woman. That’s how your storybook goes, right? It won’t be the woman doing bad things that you will hold accountable, but you will hold accountable the men who didn’t speak out for the male victim of the woman’s victimisation and abuse. My, that’s an interesting way you think.

My advice to you: Find a nice conservative anti-feminst woman who doesn't want to vote because she doesn't think she deserves to because she has low self esteem and is as dumb as two floor boards... and be happy, libhater.

Predictable that you would tap dance your way around the obvious hypocritical positions of the femanazi LEFT. That one flaw (as expounded in the OP) in the femanazi movement of partisanship exposes the entire Leftist movement as being a farce. You and your fem friends should be so proud in representing at best about 50,000 people worldwide that share in and with your hypocritical philosophy.

Originally Posted by Libhater

Where was the Left, and where the Feminists, during President Clinton's savaging of Juanita Broaddrick, Genifer Flowers, Paul Jones, Susan McDougal, and Monica Lewinsky?
These women, who suffered, if anyone has ever suffered, "workplace harassment," were dismissed from consideration by the Left, who mentioned their struggles not at all; and Monica Lewinsky, a Nice Jewish Girl from Brentwood, working as an intern in the office of the most powerful man on the planet, was treated to the silence of the feminists as she was accused, by her employer, the President of the United States, while he was committing perjury, of being unbalanced and, perhaps, of having had a "bad childhood." How, by the Left, can this be excused? It cannot. But it may be partially explained---Flowers, Jones et al., were dismissed by the Left not merely because they accused the Left's avatar, but because of their class. They were, to the Left, "trailer trash," and so, de-facto, undeserving of a hearing yet alone a defense.

The Feminists of the Left were voluble in their indictment of Justice Thomas, in Anita Hill's, at best, "he said, she said" controversy; using racial language and innuendo against him unheard in this country in decades.

They supported Tawana Brawley's improbable claims of rape up to, and, indeed, past the point at which they had been proved fraudulent and her testimony found perjured.

But what of the death of Mary Jo Kopechne by drowning? What Feminist spoke up for the dead victim? Or against the man who drove her to her death? He remained an icon of the Left for the rest of his life. Are those Feminists, then, spokespersons for the Rights of Women? Demonstrably not. They are not even spokeswomen for the rights of Liberal women--Ms. Kopechne was working for a Democrat, as was Ms. Lewinsky. They are advocates only of the positions of the Left--at whatever cost to women, what in the world are those people talking about?

Who is "the Left" and "the Feminists" you continually refer to?

Originally Posted by MegadethFan

Who is "the Left" and "the Feminists" you continually refer to?

The LEFT are any and all people who believe in bigger government, greater taxes, a socialistic form of government, advocacy of an entitlement society, to wage class warfare by redistributing the wealth and penalizing the rich/entrepreneurs (producers), a need to belittle our military and weaken our defenses both at home and abroad (reduction in military expenditures), unpatriotic behavior, anti Christian, anti Constitution or a revision thereof, anti founders philosophy, inability to determine the difference between right and wrong, utopian dreamers, indolent, and having a need to downplay and or pander to foreign states by refusing to highlight America's exceptionalism, rather, by degrading America at every turn, and a feel-good personal/secular trait to murder/abort Gods's children at a whim, etc.

Your basic feminist is an ugly man-hating radical woman-licking butch who serves no purpose on GOD's green earth other than to make life miserable for everyone else so as to make up for their many personal faults and human inadequacies. Have you ever seen a feminist with a smile on her ugly face? I sure haven't.

Originally Posted by Libhater

The LEFT are any and all people who believe in bigger government, greater taxes, a socialistic form of government, advocacy of an entitlement society, to wage class warfare by redistributing the wealth and penalizing the rich/entrepreneurs (producers), a need to belittle our military and weaken our defenses both at home and abroad (reduction in military expenditures), unpatriotic behavior, anti Christian, anti Constitution or a revision thereof, anti founders philosophy, inability to determine the difference between right and wrong, utopian dreamers, indolent, and having a need to downplay and or pander to foreign states by refusing to highlight America's exceptionalism, rather, by degrading America at every turn, and a feel-good personal/secular trait to murder/abort Gods's children at a whim, etc.

Your basic feminist is an ugly man-hating radical woman-licking butch who serves no purpose on GOD's green earth other than to make life miserable for everyone else so as to make up for their many personal faults and human inadequacies. Have you ever seen a feminist with a smile on her ugly face? I sure haven't.

^^^ This post has lost the plot.