The Holocaust revised!!!!

Discussion in 'Latest US & World News' started by Jazz, Mar 22, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0
    If Israel were attacked by the combined might of Britain, Russia,and the US, for years, do you honestly think they would be fussing about, or wasting time over Hamas? Of course not. Likewise, it is absurd to believe that for all the years Germany were entrenched in a full scale war, they were tricking Jews into showers, day in, day out, gassing them, then burning them in individual ovens.
     
  2. allegoricalfact

    allegoricalfact Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2012
    Messages:
    3,339
    Likes Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Gender:
    Female


    I found a lot of references to it but not the source of the references, as yet

    here is one

    ''In World War II, the ratio of rear-area support troops to combat troops was twelve to one. In the four years of war, no more than 800,000 soldiers saw direct combat, and of these, 37.5 percent became such serious psychiatric cases, they were permanently discharged. In the U.S. Army alone (not counting Army air crews), 504,000 men were lost to the fight for psychiatric reasons. Another 1,393,000 suffered symptoms serious enough to debilitate them for some period.''


    http://www.vva.org/archive/TheVeteran/2005_03/feature_HistoryPTSD.htm
     
  3. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0
    An Eye for an Eye: The Untold Story of Jewish Revenge Against Germans in 1945 is a book by John Sack, which states that some Jews in Eastern Europe took revenge on their former captors while overseeing over 1,000 concentration camps in Poland for German civilians. The book provides details of the imprisonment of 200,000 Germans "many of them starved, beaten and tortured" and estimates that "more than 60,000 died at the hands of a largely Jewish-run security organization."

    Sack was born to a Jewish family in New York City. His work appeared in such periodicals as Harper's, The Atlantic, Esquire and The New Yorker. He was a war correspondent in Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan and the former Yugoslavia.

    A correspondent and later a bureau chief for CBS News in Spain, he authored ten books, including the controversial title, An Eye for an Eye: The Untold Story of Jewish Revenge Against Germans in 1945. The book caused an uproar because Sack reported that, at the end of World War II, a number of Jewish Holocaust survivors, ran some Polish-Communist concentration camps and prisons, where they allegedly tortured and killed German and Polish civilians, including women and children.

    Sack has responded to American critics of the book who say that it is "sensational and its charges inadequately attributed to source" by replying that his extensive research left little doubt that Jews ran the Swietochlowice camp "from the bottom to the top". He added "It pains me as a Jew to report this".

    Sack expressed surprise at criticisms denying the accuracy of his claims, asserting that the main points have been repeatedly confirmed by others, the TV program 60 Minutes and the New York Times among them.

    [video=youtube;lqDf7wGw1RA]https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpag e&v=lqDf7wGw1RA[/video]
     
  4. Jazz

    Jazz Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2008
    Messages:
    7,114
    Likes Received:
    1,192
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Almost come true to the T. How well Hitler knew his adversaries...amazing!
     
  5. Marlowe

    Marlowe New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2011
    Messages:
    11,444
    Likes Received:
    93
    Trophy Points:
    0
    During my mid teens on a rainy day , I attempted to to read " Das Kapital " in a public library. After about two hours , a well proportioned young lady sat opposite me.
    That was it, no more Kapital for me.

    Never got around to "Mein Kampf" I doubt whether it was on our local Public Library shelves, at that time..

    " mispent youth " ? but hell I enjoyed it.- Non, je ne regrette rien


    [video=youtube;fFtGfyruroU]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fFtGfyruroU[/video]



    cheers ...
     
  6. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Note that those who warn you loudest, shall be crucified.

    Sometimes literally.
     
  7. Karma Mechanic

    Karma Mechanic Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2012
    Messages:
    8,054
    Likes Received:
    83
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Of course Sack exaggerated the numbers of Jews involved in this making it a "jewish thing:"
     
  8. allegoricalfact

    allegoricalfact Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2012
    Messages:
    3,339
    Likes Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Gender:
    Female
    http://www.hitler.org/writings/Mein_Kampf/


    and thanks for Piaf :)
     
  9. Marlowe

    Marlowe New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2011
    Messages:
    11,444
    Likes Received:
    93
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Thanks - its been added to my bookmarks - now at my age - sitting at a keyboard instead of a Public Library -I 'd be able to read it and not be distracted by any "well proportioned young ladies" -

    (wink)
     
  10. allegoricalfact

    allegoricalfact Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2012
    Messages:
    3,339
    Likes Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Gender:
    Female

    We really do not know what happened to Hitler though. If he lived it was with a broken heart.
     
  11. allegoricalfact

    allegoricalfact Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2012
    Messages:
    3,339
    Likes Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Gender:
    Female
    Lol ....................

    [video=youtube_share;oXq0E-PYDRo]http://youtu.be/oXq0E-PYDRo[/video]

    ;-)
     
  12. Marlowe

    Marlowe New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2011
    Messages:
    11,444
    Likes Received:
    93
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Good one Jack - day by day I'm discovering how I've previously been lied to by the media ..

    My parents generation was understandingly influenced by whatever information was available at that time The situation is thankfully very different nowadays and one need no longer foolishly accept - subcscribe to post WW2 pro-Zionist myths/propaganda.

    ...
     
  13. The Wyrd of Gawd

    The Wyrd of Gawd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2012
    Messages:
    29,682
    Likes Received:
    3,995
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They didn't kill people who had been in the camps for years. I guess they never learned the theory of first in, first out? If you have a program of extermination you don't let people live for years under your direct control while you are exterminating their group. It's been over 67 years and there are still countless survivors. It seems as if the camps were fountains of youth instead of death.
     
  14. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Again, who really 'won' the war? Not the millons of war dead, all they got was a shortened life. Not their families, all they got was the loss of a father or son. Not Britain, bollox to this guff that we would 'all be speaking German', millions of the best of men died, and our cities were destroyed, because shot callers used this country, to declare war on Germany. Churchill was a coward, that baled out of London, any time the Germans attacked. People say he was a 'good war time PM but a terrible peace time PM'. What that really means is he served his purpose for those that had long decided to use Britain in their attack on Germany, and once he had done that, he was otherwise useless, to the majority of British people, or to anything beneficial to our country.

    Churchill actually went from relative obscurity to PM in a short time. Long before he became PM, he lived a lavish lifestyle, that did not equate with his visible income.

    He was funded and promoted by a group that went under the name of 'the focus'. I guess you could call them a lobby group of sorts, they were not all made up of Jews, but there were certainly some prominent Jews of the time, among them.

    These things have a factual basis, yet are not commonly known, and the reason they are often not commonly known, is that we clearly rely on being told the information to start with.

    To the very best of my knowledge, and for all his writings, I do not believe that Churchill ever made a written ref to either 6million Jews being exterminated, or gas chambers.

    You would think he would, and yet, I am quite sure he never did. Make what you will of that, I am sure someone will invent a reason.

    It crippled us financially, and we have never truly recovered. So that + our millions of dead men, that was our pay off.

    Oh, and being attacked by Jewish terrorists (who had made a mircale recovery from their trauma), in the land that we invited them to share with the natives.

    Not exactly looking too attractive to me, so far.

    Did Russia win the war then? Hardly. All it did was galvanise the evil spread of Communism. Communism made strides, but the people it encroached on were the losers. Every single time.

    Did the US win the war then? Hardly. On the contrary, all it did was open all windows and doors to absolute Jewish subversion, which had been there before, but really got going at the end of WW2. Even in '57, John Foster Dullance was warning Americans that they were being subverted.

    This was a war orchestrated by Jewish shot callers, not only by, but certainly the Rothschilds.

    Had Hitler not been born, let's just say that they would have created a Hitler, since they needed the catalyst of this, in order to achieve the next set of objectives that they had in mind.

    What were those objectives?

    They are in front of your face.

    They wanted a Jewish state in Palestine, which through the use of bribes, infiltration, and subversion in the US, would allow it to operate outwith all laws, ethical or legal.

    They wanted a refuge for Jews that were on the run for serious crimes that they would give a haven to.

    They wanted to protect all of that with the creation of weapons that they could then use to blackmail the World with.

    They wanted the means to fund all of this, through turning their event into a mutli billion dollar enterprise.

    They wanted the means to hitch a lift on the relatively young Republic, and eventually use it as a means to extracting non Jews money, to support the state of Israel.

    They need this event, as possibly the only means they had of ensuring mainly Jewish issues dominate history,schools, and cinema.

    They needed the event to use as a psychogical weapon, lest anyone shed any light on their skullduggery, they can roll out the holocost.

    So you can see the incentives, and if you can see the incentives, you can see they have all been achived, right?

    That's who won the war.
     
  15. allegoricalfact

    allegoricalfact Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2012
    Messages:
    3,339
    Likes Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Gender:
    Female
    When I look back, I don't think my mother believed the Holocaust, others too when I think about it. They were practical people they would have known the impossibility of it.

    And again my Ma as other women I knew who had lived through two Wars had deep sympathy for German women who went through worse bombing raids than they had and the rapes ............... they didn't say things then though, one just gathered ...........life before TV.
     
  16. The Wyrd of Gawd

    The Wyrd of Gawd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2012
    Messages:
    29,682
    Likes Received:
    3,995
    Trophy Points:
    113
    People love Jewish fairy tales. I can't think of one that most people don't believe.
     
  17. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Very true.

    One minute we are told that there were dedicated extermination camps.

    Then you have people having lived for years in these extermination camps.

    What happened there? Did the Germans get bored? Did they have poor eyesight? Run out of Zyclon B?

    No doubt some new excuse will now be created, to cover for the above...

    It's like talking with creationists.

    :alcoholic:

    - - - Updated - - -

    Very true.

    Many still believe that Moses literally parted the sea.

    There were apparently eye witness accounts.

    For some reason though, I am going to go with the 'that is BS' option.

    :smile:
     
  18. The Wyrd of Gawd

    The Wyrd of Gawd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2012
    Messages:
    29,682
    Likes Received:
    3,995
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I love reading your comments. They are hilarious.
     
  19. allegoricalfact

    allegoricalfact Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2012
    Messages:
    3,339
    Likes Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Gender:
    Female
    20 servants ? !!!! The Phoenix Group, I think it was called, supported his love of a good life and again there was a huge influx of monies, his way, when the US came in. He was half American after all.


    The British actually never forgave Churchill for setting the troops onto the miners.He really was not liked, that too is victors propaganda. I heard the younger generations say 'he was a great man' I never heard those who fought say such things.
     
  20. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Since it is said that Germans exterminated the women and kids first, I take it after all those years, there were no female or child survivors, right?
     
  21. Marlowe

    Marlowe New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2011
    Messages:
    11,444
    Likes Received:
    93
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Did he ? How so ?
     
  22. allegoricalfact

    allegoricalfact Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2012
    Messages:
    3,339
    Likes Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Gender:
    Female

    Mmmm but Fairy Stories are where we hid our pagan Gods and Goddesses, what these are I dare not say ;-)
     
  23. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0

    Since the measure of how evil a man is, does not appear measured by the number he kills by his own hand,but by the condtions he creates and orchestrates, that then lead to the large scale deaths of innocents, I shall say with no fear of contradiction, and using that measure, that the Bauer dynasty, and it's various bloodlines are more 'evil', than Stalin, Hitler, or any other single figure, that we are told to hate upon.

    Not only have they accounted for more death, they have been doing it for almost three centuries now, and they are still doing it today, albeit they naturally hide behind a plethora of proxy agents, and hired hands.

    Almost every post war conflict you have seen has been about getting a Rothschild owned bank established there. If a nation refuses, and they really would do well to, that nation becomes demonised, and eventually attacked, under some false premise.

    You can bet that Iran's central bank, is more a true central bank, and not a R'child proxy bank.

    They are more than happy to sacrifice Jews along the way as well, if need be. Nothing is too much for them, they see everything as stepping stones.

    Note how they generally keep out of the limelight, which is absurd, when you consider just how much of the World's wealth they have now accumulated. You would expect such important people to be under the spotlight a lot, right, yet by and large, what sort of exposure does our media put on them, here and in the US?

    Britian fell under their financial control a few centuries ago. The British establishment, including the Monarchy, are in with it. Bedfellows to an extent. The US fell under their total control, the day the Fed was created.

    Any nation that falls under their control shall soon find that it's armies are then used as private armies, to further THEIR interests.
     
  24. allegoricalfact

    allegoricalfact Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2012
    Messages:
    3,339
    Likes Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Gender:
    Female
    The Empire Insidious,
     
  25. Jack Napier

    Jack Napier Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    40,439
    Likes Received:
    207
    Trophy Points:
    0
    'Tis a strange thing indeed.

    For all the silly terms that are thrown around at generally composed people, that often use Jewish sources, you know, terms like Nazi, and hater, and bigot, that the only people today I really seeing behaving in an intolerant, bigoted, and threatening manner, are a fair % of Jews, and it seems, sadly, an ignorant mass, who have been emotionally tricked into giving tacit approval to such behaviours, while all the time ignoring the small fact that it is very rare for those that speak as I do, or as AF does, to advocate, endorse, approve of, or wish for violence, against Jews or otherwise, save for in a defensive situation, of course.

    You do not see us suggesting that people should be put in prison for believing the holocost narrative,or writing about it, or talking about it, and nor would I want that, unless it were cases of financial fraud involved.

    You do not see us giving tacit approval to firebombing the homes of Jews here, or using acts of violence against Jews that refuse to succumb 100% to our narrative.

    It may well be that I consider Wiesel, Rosenblatt etc to be shameful liars, yet you do not see me suggesting that as retaliation, it should be open season on them, up to and including violence.

    Starting to see a picture emerge here?

    People like us, the so called 'Nazi's', are clearly pacifist in nature, and consider all human life to have value. Nor do we support acts of violence and intimidation against speakers and writers.

    While those calling us 'Nazi's' do engage, or lend their approval to such methods.

    ******

    If there can be laws that protect non semites that call themselves 'Jews', and these are broad enough to include perceived 'insults', on what basis can we NOT have enshrined in law, laws to protect gentiles from Jews?

    Hmm?

    [video=youtube;s-wv5aLtfSk]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s-wv5aLtfSk&feature=player_detailpage[/video]
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page