The Holocaust revised!!!!

If one read my post correctly, they would see that they are not red herrings at all, but are illustrative of my point.

 

People, people...we can't stay out of focus on who the real war criminals are from the WW2 are. They are only Nazis, and their collaborators---and in a few cases, the Japanese.

Any member of the Allies were part of the "Greatest Generation" they are far superior to any member or any armed forces since them. Even DEVGRU Seal Team Six cannot compare in their glory.

Anyway, to prove just how great the Allied armies were, keep this in mind: no Allied soldier was ever convicted of a war crime in any multi-national tribunal. No American military member could have gone outside the rules of war in this conflict---because there were no trials or inquiries that came up with any punishments. Same thing with the Soviets. There has been no demands for Soviet war crimes trials by our government and major media, because they fought with great honor---like the Knights of the Round Table in WW2. The Soviets would have naturally tried any of their own war criminals, for the alledged atrocities of the Kayten Forest, the slave labor and genocide of German POW's, and rumors of millions of rapes in East Europe and Germany---if they in fact had any real evidence.

 

Jack , what I've learnt from this thread + from posters like Jonsa, is one can deny Christ, Mohamed , Abram 's + David chats with a god, - deny all Hindu dieties , incl. the Big Guy - creator, deny . deny, whatever else , but none of the gods , can save you from the fury + wrath of the Holocaust fanatics who'd , if they cant crucify you , would happily wish to see you imprisoned , until you recant.

Holocaust has become the world's most sacred cow. along with all its BS. .

 

45% of American Military was sent home during WWII with 'mental problems'. They would have been shot in WWI for sssshhhh you know what .....................

They are always being asked to fight Wars that that they have no stake in

 

And no German was convicted of a war crime if there was evidence the allies had undertaken the same tactic.

 

" History is written by the victors - winners - conquerors"
attrib' to Churchill-Napoleon-etc.

History would have been very different if Nelson lost at Trafalgar. You +- I would be speaking French -= No Nazis (wink)

 

No you would still be speaking English

 

And ............where did all the documents found by the Russians go ? Not accessible to the general public nor to Historians. They went straight to the Jewish league of what ever ......... Now wtf is that ? What about all those in Camps who were not Jewish of whom there were far far more ? What of their families ?

Do you care ? Or do you have an excuse for why they should be refused access to any documents which might give them an inkling ..........................or ?

 

where is your citation for this?

 

Look in your archives or watch these videos


http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=8339

 

In other words nothing

- - - Updated - - -

In other words nothing

 

Mai's oui monsieur -

nevertheless , our history would have been very different.

 

Not at all - France had already abandoned thoughts of invasion before the battle. Napoleon really had no head for all things naval.

 

I think history is "lies created by the victor."

 

Nobody is refused access to the documents at Bad Arolsen. They are open to the public and contain details on everyone-not just Jews-who were murdered by the Nazis. http://www.its-arolsen.org/en/resea...n/regulations-for-access/section-1/index.html
You can stop lying now.

- - - Updated - - -

You'll be lucky!

 

Some people are unfathomable. Can't name names but we've a good example of that, on here. Swears he is not a Commie. Promises us he is a defender of human life and dignity. Then considers Bolshevism to be something wonderful, and liberating! Takes massive offence to my questioning the numbers and methods in the 'holocost'. Has no problem bypassing the 66million victims that his heroes murdered.

You can see my confusion.

Calls himself an anti Zionist. Then tries to arrange social meetings with members of the IDF.

You can see my confusion.

Wishes to make criminals out of those with no criminal record ,who are good people. Who just doesn't happen to tow the party line. Refuses to condemn the thuggery, violence, death threats, and fire bombs used by those that cannot fully use the legal system, to bludgeon heretics.

Wants us to believe he is a champion of freedom and civil liberties. Declares, just a month or two ago, that he can phyiscally identify Jews 99% of the time. Then retracts that, and takes a new position in which he went from 99%, to having lost this magical ability altogher.

See - whatever else that is saying, it's not saying to me that here is someone that truly stands for something.

It is not saying to me that here is a man who can be relied on to make a statement, and stand by it, even for a short time.

I find that sort of person more difficult to fathom than if someone just outright admits they have a dog in the fight.

I may not like their dog. But at least there is an honesty about it.

When someone switches positons too often, too rapidly, I begin to doubt their ability to be true to any position, or anyone.

Ironically, such types end up entirely isolated. In moving around, the way they do, trying to be all things to all people, they don't even gain trust from those that are sworn enemies. Everyone just ends up seeing them as a person that blows one way, and then the other way.

No one respects that.

It may even be I would afford more respect to an Israeli Zionist, for at least he takes a position. And he will try to build a case, based upon that position.

He may represent that which is my political nemesis, however, I know where I stand with him, and he knows where he stands with me.

Jews know well that while I would not wish to cause harm to them, I am not sympathetic to what they stand for and represent, in the here and now, at least.

They know I do not have a favourable impression of them as a collective, albeit some individuals are of course fine.

But not sufficient in number to outweigh the the negative.

My position was not so much chosen by me, but more of an organic reaction in me.

Based on what I see with my own eyes, and can hear, with my own ears.

In fact, even if ALL of this holocost were true, I still would not change my mind. Jews today have a totally shocking repuation, holocost or not.

They have a shocking rep, because they behave in a shocking way.

Even if all of the holocost were true, it would only serve to then make what they have done in the Near East actually worse.

How can you empathise with people who themselves have acted like monsters, for the past 66yrs..

 

In other words watch the videos ..................

 

Yeah, and I'll just go and read Mein Kampf for a totally impartial examination of Jews and Judaism...oh, and Leuchter's videos as an example of how to perform forensic examinations.

(Edited for sarcasm)

 

well that is fun conspiracy stuff....I was looking for data

 

Talking of which, who can fairly say this did not turn out to be true...

Mein Kampf page 184-

When the Zionists try to make the rest of the world believe that the new national consciousness of the Jews will be satisfied by the establishment of a Jewish State in Palestine, the Jews thereby adopt another means to dupe the simple-minded Gentile. They have not the slightest intention of building up a Jewish State in Palestine so as to live in it. What they really are aiming at is to establish a central organization for their international swindling and cheating. As a sovereign State, this cannot be controlled by any of the other States. Therefore it can serve as a refuge for swindlers who have been found out and at the same time a high-school for the training of other swindlers.

 

In the videos ..............

 

I know I am sorry it would take ages to find and since I am bunking off at the mo' due to being freezing cold .........I haven't really got time to find what I need to put my money where my mouth is ............... I will chase it at some point though. When I do I'll post it


It is in one of those videos, though not sure which one. They are worth watching just for the footage btw

 

HUH ? did you miss my post #892 Krakow Institute's report on Leuchter's findings ?

......

 

I didn't check the date! O.k. then, Harper, the secretive, doesn't want us to know!

While I got you on the line, I quickly want to tell you that I am impressed with all your denier debunking links. I will check some of them out. But your reference to Hoess' admission statement and comment is wrong. You wrote:

Did you not read, that they used the same confession he made after three days of beatings and threats against his wife and kids?
One down for you, Jonsa - one up for me!!