White supremacist Nathan Damigo sucker-punched woman at Trump protest

I guess that is why your avatar is a ? mark because you don't have a clue.

I already know that Rush Limbaugh is a hypocrite and a ass clown so that is nothing new.

 

I didn't know it was a crime to be a coward.

Why because you claim she did, sorry but you aren't prosecutor or a judge to charge anyone with a crime.

She probably didn't see him, since he punched and ran off like the coward he is.

 

Which is a lie (another lie) you are telling:



Down. Goes. Moldylocks. LOL

 

Ya know, the more I look at that video the more I think Nathan Damigo should file assault charges against her, because it clearly looks like she tried to Headbutt his Fist and seriously injure him.

 

Do you even know how ridiculous and sad you sound or are you completely oblivious to this reality?

 

Aww bless. He took advantage of his onerous time in prison to become educated.

MAGA.

Man that chick is so violent! Just look at her! I mean look, don't look anywhere else, don't notice the neo nazi thugs, they don't exist, check her out, a violent leftist Marxist anti freedom America hating chick, a vagina owner, a slut, probably has three different black kids, ifyouknowwhatimean.

 

You ok, buddy?

 

For a point that's irrelevant, you make quite a busy use of it.

What I think is based on facts, not suppositions, like your side's numerous theories about the incident. Damigo's past crimes and activities are not the fruit of my imagination - that is something he has done beyond doubts. You can't deny it.

I agree.

 

Really, but you cats are defending a man punching a woman as if she was another man. Talk about ridiculous and sad, not to mention the fact that the coward runs and hides behind a group of men after he punches her. It says a lot about the so-called conservative men on this forum.

 

I really enjoy the neo-nazi shtick. When alt-right, white supremacist just isn't insulting enough ... The woman, or more accurately, the "willing combatant" is undeserving of any sympathy. If it helps, liberals might just want to regard her as "collareral damage" in their war on free speech. Make no bones, there's war being waged. If liberals must label their opposition as nazis, so be it. Neo-Nazi vs Neo-Stalinist? Some choice ...

 

I suggest you take s step back away from the keyboard. Next I reported your comment, since the whole rule violation. But hey, good luck with those imaginary neo-Nazis running around everywhere.

 

It seems to be Godwin's law playing out in the streets.

If they are calling you a Nazi and justifying physical violence against you they have lost the argument.

We should look at this as a victory. ANTIFA and BAMN represent the death of the far left.

 

No one said she was there ille

If a woman goes looking for a fight with men as this one did it is not a problem.

Feminists wanted equality they got it.

Can't have it both ways and say you wanted equality but then hide behind your vagina when the going gets tough

 

I think Newtons 3rd law bears examination. ANTIFA should cosider carefully to what extreme they're willing to go in their "protest". Newtons law is not subjective. It is certain, inevitable, and inescapable.

 

I answered yes several times. During one of those times I mentioned my family. You asked a yes/no question, you got a yes answer multiples times.

Please show how my definition differs from yours in order to prove this accusation.

I'm going to skip most of the personal attacks and trolling.

The dude is part of the National Policy Institute. If you go to his website, it contains almost no original content, just citing Spencer and the NPI. According to NPI's founder:

"America was, until this last generation, a white country designed for ourselves and our posterity. It is our creation, it is our inheritance, and it belongs to us."

So you can't address what I said and have to change the subject instead. Got it.

Speaking of a failure to read, I haven't supported the efforts to mandate this issue on the trans side. I have only supported allowing people to do what they want with their property. You are literally so confused that I'm not supporting the liberal side of this that you refuse to read my position on the issue.

If you had read my last post, you would see that I don't support the government forcing the issue in either direction. I support people doing what they want with their property.

Yes, I'm more overwhelmingly negative towards Trump. Because he is the most anti-libertarian person to take the office. What part of this isn't sinking in? I was harder on Obama than I was on Bush, but neither one is as bad as Trump. We've heard from several conservatives here that Trump was the most liberal person running on the Republican ticket, and I've repeatedly criticized him for not being capitalist enough. Your whole, "If you don't like Trump, then you are a liberal" argument is completely dishonest.

Except my criticism is that Trump is even more of a big government supporter than Hillary was.

No. That is literally the opposite of what I said. Only Cruz came close to challenging Trump for being the least libertarian Republican candidate. But again, congrats on recognizing that libertarianism and social conservatism are at odds after arguing the opposite in your the post before, saying that I wasn't a libertarian because I criticized social conservatives.

Because your "challenge" was complete nonsense and you still fail to comprehend why a libertarian would oppose the least libertarian person running. How is this perplexing?

The person in question compared her supporters to Nazis, not her herself.

I've been listening to Jones since almost the beginning of his radio career. He started the whole thing as a radio show out of his home. Sure, he's had guest hosts, but he owns the site, he owns the programming, and he develops most of the content himself. If you are going to kvetch about people doing their homework, do some of your own.

What? Did you even read the sentence you responded to here?

Still defending a lunar landing denier, 9/11 truther, Sandy Hook denying, Pizzagate peddling conspiracy nutter as real news? Really? That's beyond intellectual dishonesty.

In a recent custody battle, Jones's legal defense was that he's an entertainer and he is portraying a character. Multiple news sources covered the story. Google it yourself if you have an honest interest.

If you have some proof that they weren't on Foundation business, then provide it. I'm all ears.

Not really, just more of the same fringe right nonsense from people who have no familiarity with non-profit foundations: https://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=16680#

I provided you with the quotes you asked for, you cut them out and now claim I was running away from the question? That's a new low.

Every quote I provided was from the past. From before you and I ever discussed a single thing.

I did.

That's what I did in the last post.

Yeah, we both know I'll run away from . . . erm . . . what I've already done.

Another fail. I never proposed government spending as a solution. In fact, I've advocated simply starting with ending government subsidies for fossil fuels.

More comedy gold. He constantly quotes a LIBERAL economic think tank to support this position, but when I argue for more capitalism, you accuse me of being liberal. Thanks for the laugh again.

Show anything from Clinton that would come close to the imminent domain needed to build Trump's wall.

Seriously, try to keep up. Trump has sued and threatened to sue numerous people for basic free speech. Someone (correctly) says that he has minority stake in a real estate venture and he sues them, only to be embarrassed in court. A business analyst says during an interview that he thinks Trump's casino will fail (and it did)? Trump sues them. Some makes a joke about him being related to an orangutan? Lawsuit. Then there are the numerous times he has supported restricting the free speech of the press. Oh, and the time he tried to sue the New York Times based on the not-really-a-law-against-it "irresponsible intent."

Again, I already did.

As predicted, you've confused definition for defense. Here's a hint when dealing with libertarians: "collectivist" isn't a complement. I'll try to make this as simple as possible: collectivism is a bad thing.

I've called Stalin a fascist on this site as well. Yes, Marx's collectivist morality has gotten a lot of people killed, because collectivism is really ****ing dangerous. How did you not already know that?

Also, a quote from me from earlier in the exact same thread: "I don't agree with Marx's morality either, but his moral philosophy is NOT what you described earlier. You describe an egoistic, individualistic morality. Marx was a rabid collectivist who preached the tyranny of the majority."

 

One violent piece of trash punches another violent piece of trash, is what this whole story amounts too.

 

We see that playing out. I may have no sympathy for the Raggedy Ann impersonator that got punched, frankly I think she deserved it. But the second you resort to violence you lost the argument. So I won't sing the fellow that punched her any praises. He sunk to her level. We can't support taking them down by any means necessary. That makes us (the United States, the right wing, and so forth) immoral because we start to justify the means with the ends.

If we protest peacefully they won't. They are angry and violent. They will look like petulant children.

Though a little part of me wants to overpower them with stronger force, cooler heads must prevail.

It would likely be best to try and petition the government for National Guard to intervene. Something needs to happen because someone is going to get killed.

 

Obviously you haven't been following the thread.

Sorry, real men don't punch women and that's the bottom line.

 

Yes I have and yes they do when women attack your bottom line is childish and wrong.

Either that you must admit that women's equality is wrong.

Can't have it both ways

 

How about if we were to support artist that promote Violence and degradation of women, would that be okie dokie?

BTW, I like your new choice in avatar, although I miss the humor and hypocrisy of reading you complaining about violence against women and the last avatar choice of James Brown! I take it that it finally dawned on you that he may not be the best choice of mentors, right

 

Looks like her boyfriend got his ass handed to him as well. Will these fascist Nazi's ever learn?



She was caught lying to Snopes as well. Snopes has been exposed as nothing more than a left wing slob rag.

http://theralphretort.com/moldylock...em-reuters-photo-of-her-was-doctored-4022017/

 

Did you just assume her ****ing gender?

 

Which one is the women

 

That's The Way You Do It

Remember the rioting that broke out in Washington DC during PDT's inauguration? I'll bet that most of them thought they could get away with it. And among those that were arrested, I'll bet most of them thought they'd get some not-too-large fine, or parole, or community service.

Yeah, well, maybe not:

A grand jury in the Superior Court of D.C. returned a superseding indictment in the Inauguration Day felony rioting case Thursday, the U.S. Attorney's Office of D.C. reports...Approximately 212 people face felony charges...Additional charges have been added to some of the defendants cases, including destruction of property involving damage to a limousine.
The way to stop rioting is by vigorous, aggressive police action. Of course, everybody knows this. The mayor of Baltimore knows this. The mayor of Ferguson knows this. Even that adipose porker who runs Berkeley knows this. But they chose to not make any attempt to restrain the rioting because, bottom line, they have more sympathy for the goals and aspirations of the circus freak show rioters than they do with law-abiding citizens, i.e. normal people of their communities. So the cities burned.

I only wish there was a way to tell the normal people, "hey, the authorities are not on your side. They will sit back and watch you and everything you've built burn if it means they can further their agenda."

You would think Berkeley would at least be receptive, but the people there keep electing the same crew year after year. And pride themselves on how progressive they are.

http://ace.mu.nu/archives/369505.php

 

The Entire planet Is laughing at you and your ilk right now. It's literally a world wide cackle.