White supremacist Nathan Damigo sucker-punched woman at Trump protest

BOY! I hope the two of them don't get married and have kids, because those kids are gonna grow up to be some Wimps. At least she seemed to be able to take a bunch better than her Boyfriend.

 

No, actually the world is largely preparing to wipe out you and your ilk.

 

Well then, if she lied to Snopes, why don't you post the Snopes report instead of a right wing spin of the Snopes report? Hmm?
https://archive.is/ItVON
The article you liked to references the above, and it is not what your article is talking about. Where is the honesty on your side? Where are her "lies to Snopes"? A search only turned up this: http://www.snopes.com/?s=Louise+Rosealma

Where is the honesty on your side?

 

Why did you lie about him sucker punching her? Didn't you see the footage before you posted it? Your characterization is pretty shameful.

 

Oh, I watched the footage and saw her standing still and then reaching out to stop his rushed advance, at which point he sucker punched her and she was holding NOTHING in her hands. What amazes me is how you righties can look at a picture of a tree or car or person and assert it's not there!

 

Cackle, there's an appropriate word, Trump does resemble an old crone. His little troll army out on the streets, though, they resemble Eastern European skinheads circa 1970s.

What a brave hero. He could have been blown to bits. We must stop these terrorists.

#BAMN

 

Then you knowingly lied about her being sucker punched because she wasn't. Not at all. Funny how you defend a fascist Nazi who went there to intentionally hurt people. Makes you look like a hypocrite when you start crying about who got their lights punched out in a fight they chose to be in.

 

It is not. Therefore you are without a basis in this discussion.

The same can easily be said of yourself.

You expect those present to believe that in the current age of social media, the individual in question was completely devoid of any idea of who Nathan Damigo is, and had no way of identifying him for the purpose of filing charges of assault?

 

No, you saw her being sucker punched and you are the one lying about it. It is VERY CLEAR in the video. No question. Maybe you are very carefully looking at the wrong video so you don't have to see it.

 

That is because you are attempting to make the argument that the need for a permit in order for a protest to be legal is unjust. Whether or not such is the case, has no bearing on anything that is currently being discussed. It is the system that is in place, those that attend Berkeley were in possession of a permit in compliance with the law, and the antifa anarchists who showed up were in violation of various laws in place in the state of California.

The past actions of Nathan Damigo are not relevant to the discussion at hand.

You would do well to give careful consideration to how you wish to proceed further in this discussion. If you continue with this argumentative narrative. If you continue to claim that the past actions of Nathan Damigo are relevant, then the same standard shall be held against you. If there is ever another Michael Brown-type event, and the past criminal acts of the dead defendant are used to show the police officer was justified in using deadly force, you will not be allowed to argue that their past criminal history made no difference in the matter.

Meaning that it does not demonstrate the mitigating factors that were in play prior to the so-called assault taking place.

 

Such a claim has indeed been made on the part of myself. Wearing a mask, taking part in a riot, assault with a deadly weapon, they are all crimes that the individual in question committed simply by being present. She was without a legal reason to be present at Berkeley at the time of the riot.

 

You are lying, she was not sucker punched. Everyone knows it. You are defending a fascist Nazi who went there looking for a fight and broke the law in doing so. So what does that make you? A sympathizer?

She perpetuated the violence, she was not sucker punched. Get some glasses.

 

Ok you don't like my terminology. What kind of a punch was it? The Nazis went to the protest specifically to attack the protesters like her. And he attacked her. I'm surprised he hasn't been arrested yet.

 

I don't like you spreading lies about a fascist Nazi who went there looking for a fight, then crying and blathering on about how she is some sort of "innocent female" who got punched. She should be arrested and got exactly what she came looking for.

It says more about you with your defense of such people. Puts it into perspective and lumps you in with the ANTIFA crowd.

 

A neo nazi punch, they're kind of womanly men themselves so it's not surprising he'd tackle a woman.

 

Well, if she was throwing bottles at people, someone should have brought in the police. But the facts are that the protest was announced, people knew it was going to happen, and the reason for showing up was to protest. But the Nazis decided to go to attack the protesters. They were the ones who were out of line and conspiring to riot. And fascists are now saying girls and women are fair game for punching and beatings. How disgustingly evil and criminal is such fascism? All of them should be locked up after being given a sound thrashing.

 

I'm proud to be anti-fascist. I don't fight fascists because I can win. I fight fascists because they are fascists.

 

You are still telling lies and not getting your story right. She went to a Pro Trump rally to incite violence. But you know that already and are just spouting more nonsense.

So you are a member of ANTIFA? Are you a black pajama, mask wearing violent protester?

 

No, actually I thought it was a trump protest rally. Now I see that was my assumption and that I was wrong. It was a pro-Trump rally. My mistake. So I wasn't lying. I was mistaken. And I say counter-protesters should expect whatever they get. My perspective on this has now changed.

"Member"? Is there an organization to be a "member" of? No, I'm not a member of anything. I just oppose fascism.

 

The mayor of the city of Berkeley ordered the police officers to stand down, and refrain from performing their duties during the riot.

It was known that bottles, bricks, and explosive devices were going to be thrown at those who were present?

 

You mean after 36 pages, in a thread you started, you had no idea she went to a Pro Trump rally to incite violence? I find that hard to believe because you sound like a pretty reasonable and intelligent poster. But if you were mistaken, then I can accept that.

Don't we all?

However, I don't consider ANTIFA to be an organization against fascism. Rather, they are a very anti Trump organization using the excuse that Trump is a Fascist and therefore justified to incite violence. There is a big difference in what they stand for and what they are actually doing. They are hypocrites and not what liberals or Democrats (or anyone) should really be aligning with.

 

Delusions are strong with this one. And is that a threat?

 

Funny how you don't mention the full video.

 

[

Obviously not all at all considering how much the actual neo nazi prick's been either praised or just ignored for expediency.

Antifa predate Trump by decades and they cannot expand beyond those few prepared to bother showing up for street thug neo nazis, almost all of whom are suppressed and closeted gays.

 

There is nothing wrong with fighting back against violent, aggressive, anti-FA scum. I don't care if it's a man or woman. If you're a member of anti-FA, you're a terrorist.