Please show where I said I wanted to go back to the days when "Women were the property of their father to be married off against their will and then once married had no right to their bodies and were forced to submit to their husbands." You can't because you're a cynical child who's already lost the argument. Which is why you're forced to lie and saying I said things I never did. Don't worry, no one expects much from progressive minds so I'm not offended. LOL
I believe the same study showed an increase in male mice becoming more feminized if not fully turning homosexual
Define "moving on." From what I see, women today are more depressed and alone than ever before. Their 'freedoms' have given them empty, meaningless lives.
So then you aren’t lamenting the loss of feudal era Japan and not believe that Japan needs to go back to the values and morality of that time? So why did you seem to so lament the loss of that era when strong men could legally rape and beat their wives that they bought from their wive’s father against the will of their wife if they didn’t submit? You seem to think that era was pretty great.
The only option isn't between today's lost Japan and the oppressive feudal days. The middle ground is what the country was like between the two; standard nationalism under the protection of the Patriarchy. The same goes for the US - we were a better nation before feminism. Life before 1990 in the US were the better days, for sure. We are a crumbling empire at this point - we rot from within. We will eventually be lead by the next alpha minded ideology which naturally rises as nations that don't conform to the patriarchy are prone to fade.
Gender roles are natural and need to be highly encouraged by society. We had it before, we can have it again.
Name a patriarchy that has ever existed that wasn’t backed up by use of force against women who don’t submit.
you need to wake up - this is from the leftist rag the guardian https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2016/may/18/womens-rights-happiness-wellbeing-gender-gap
Gender roles clearly are not natural when the whole thing falls apart the instant men can no longer beat women into submission. The only way you will have them again is to use force against women.
If men stop being the protectors, society falls - imagine if every man decided to stop being cops, security, military. We would crumble. Similarly, women - when they left the home and decided being a professional was more important than begin a wife/mother, they began the slow path to destruction.
Not really - when enough men and women agree to the Patriarchy, those women who refuse to get in line end up becoming financially and culturally isolated. Shaming works, it's innate and we should encourage it.
Is this your way of saying you can’t name a single patriarchy that has ever existed that didn’t involve the violent oppression of women?
First quote addresses this opinion piece. You fear feminism. Why? You think you know what's best for women and they don't?
Name a single patriarchy that has ever worked by shaming alone without any violence against women who refused to submit.
Sorry could not resist with the previous post But it appears the OP is yearning for a bygone era when men were white and the woman were subservient
Folks who weren't even born in this country will sell their souls to be accepted by the very folks who don't like them.
you're giving a false idea of what those days were liked - I grew up in a traditional home, and my mother was very happy, as she is now.