I avoid replying to people who report me for disagreeing with them. As for the topic, I'm a strong supporter of the philosophy to keep abortion safe, legal and rare. The best way to reduce abortions is through sex education and inexpensive, effective contraceptives.
You are right, the only harvesting that's profitable is after conception, the human baby must be on its way to life before killing it will turn a profit.
I know we're going off the topic by discussing the OP's post , (the topic really being guns) but I think you should answer questions pertaining to your post. OKEY dokey then...WHO pays for this ? It's expensive. Anti-Choicers hate paying taxes now and get all fainty if they think one penny is going to help actual BORN children. And who takes care of these subsequent children? Do NOT tell me they will all be adopted....they will NOT all be adopted, they aren't now. Next, tell me why you think abortion will stop if it's banned?
PP doesn't make a profit on fetal tissue and NO one has ever proven they do . I'm sure you'll never know how using fetal tissue in scientific experiments may someday save your life or the lives of loved ones....
Which, IMO, is silly since we can easily do like the Chinese and simply sell off the parts of executed prisoners. Furthermore, with cloning, there is no need for "baby parts". Lastly, if Pro-Lifers love children so much, why are there so many kids needing adoption? Why do most of those same "Pro-Lifers" support banning Muslims and Mexicans from immigration?
You're assuming I actually care what you think. You are wrong. Because Muslims and Mexicans lives would be so much better if they stayed in their own country and improved it rather than running away from the problem. It is to help them become better people.
Likewise, some people are better off without children. Abortions allow them to mature and help them become better people.
Do they want to save babies or not? They've been crying for decades. Time to step up or shut up, I say. I was trying to find the adoption rate for babies, but I believe most are adopted. The older the child, the less chance they will be adopted.
The right wing is always saying that charities can step up rather than using taxes to pay for services. Now is their chance. All of those rich churches can pay the offset costs and ensure the children get homes. Do they want to save babies or not? Do they really have convictions or is it all just more smoke and mirrors?
Same situation, You don't terminate people on life support unless the prognosis suggests that the are not going to recover.
What if it's your billionaire husband who has cheated on you with porn stars and you stand to inherit everything? Would it be okay to pull the plug then? What if you promised the hospital a $100M to build a new wing for old people?
Not even remotely similar. There is quite a difference between a human being who has lived outside the womb and a seven day old fetus.
What do we do with the thousands of additional unwanted children on top of the ones we have now. As you read this, there are thousands of children that will never see the inside of a permanent, loving home. They grow up in a system, never knowing what it is like to feel loved and cherished, and many end up in prison. How many have you adopted?
How do you end a life of something that is not a life. I threw away an acorn today, can I brag that I cut down and oak tree
No Democrats care about the living. People like you care more about a zygote. You believe that life begins at conception and ends at birth
Hi Renee, did your acorn have a beating, human heart? Toes and fingers begining to form??.....so callous!
