They are exactly the same. They are billed the same they have medical diagnostic criteria the same way and they are both performed by medical staff.
That it does, but acting as a coercive power to seize control of wombs in order that the will of zealots can be imposed upon others is not in concert with whatever rights the People voluntarily cede to the State. Maximal statists cannot be allowed to intrude upon such private matters to such an extreme.
While he and his party attempt to cut funding to entities that support children, welfare, SNAP, WIC, even healthy school lunches. If you think those deductions make raising kids less expensive, you don't know what it costs to raise a kid.
Why do zealots demand that the State must seize control of every woman's womb when their suasive powers are inadequate to make all those women think exactly like them in the choices they make for themselves?
AND to eliminate the FACT that this discriminates against women we should make it so that the Wealthy, if they need a life saving procedure like a new heart , can FORCE one of the 98%, male or female, to give them their body part, in this case a heart...... Great idea!!!
A choice to end a life without even bothering with a prognosis how very ethical. It is from purely semantical approach dishonest.
Then cite the post. You can redeem yourself and say you spoke incorrectly or misunderstood my position. But you posted a complete fabrication and every post from now on will be dismissed as such. Say you made a mistake and we are fine. Keep digging and you destroy your credibility
Never once stated that banning guns would save lives. You can not cite the post because it does not exist. You have lost all credibility and everyone can see it
Does this mean you'll ignore me and never reply to a post of mine again? Sorry, but disagreed. I won't say further because it's off topic. See you on the gun banning threads!
Surrre, as soon as YOU explain or show the "logic" or sense in that inane illogical, nonsensical, meaningless quote (which you did not attribute honestly to Reagan) OH! You missed , ""Duh, ever notice that all the people against women's rights do not want their own rights touched?"""
The government has no rights of any kind. It has, instead, a solemn obligation to defend the rights of the people and to govern solely by their just consent.
I'm not talking about you jerking off into a tissue and flushing it. I'm talking about brushing your teeth. Cheek cells have 46 chromosomes as do all of your other cells except for sperm cells.
Agreed here. We, the People empower the government to do certain things. It has no "inherent right" to do anything.
Stay on topic! YOU are telling another poster to stay on topic....gee, didn't you read all your own off topic posts including post 41!!! """"You should review the major gun threads. He often states banning or highly restricting guns will "save lives" regardless of the topic. Yes, even when it's pointing out that 2/3s of all US 'gun deaths' are Suicides""""""""
