Not only is Brennan trying to walk back his attack on Trump and down play his comments, a little further in the article he said it's a fundamental right for Americans to elect their leaders. Now that is an extremely ironic comment coming from him and others who want an elected leader thrown out of office.
Sorry, it's been proven https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_interference_in_the_2016_United_States_elections
If he knows something then why doesn't he tell us? Is it because maybe Trump didn't collude with anyone and the election results he's upset with occurred when Obama was in charge?
There is nothing in that wiki article proving a single vote was changed or influenced by Russians. You want to continue that fantasy try quoting the specific part that you claim backs you up instead of hiding behind a general link that doesn't.
LOL...Wikipedia is the arbiter of "truth" now. Why is Mueller wasting his time and our money then? He should hand the case over to Wikipedia! You make debunking leftist nonsense easy AND fun!
What pisses him off is that Comey didn't publicly announce the Russiagate investigation in time to salvage Clinton's campaign. Crossfire hurricane would have been dropped on Nov. 9th if Crooked Hillary had won. But Hillary lost, and their smear campaign has come back to haunt them.
But you don't mention that it pissed him off that Comey re-opend the hillary investigation just days before the election????
FYI, if you watch the interview instead of posting a Breitbart spin article, you would see that Brennan NEVER WALKED BACK the statement, NEVER. And another FYI: Home » Breitbart Breitbart Has this Media Source failed a fact check? LET US KNOW HERE. Share: FacebookTwitterGoogle+PinterestEmailTumblrRedditLinkedInFlipboardGoogle BookmarksShare314 QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, overt propaganda, poor or no sourcing to credible information and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the notes section for that source. See all Questionable sources. Bias: Extreme Right, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Failed Fact Checks
I have no proof that would justify your beliefs about Trump and Russia. And isn't that the issue? Why is Robert Mueller wasting his time interviewing brothel owners if he has an air tight case against Donald Trump? He obviously doesn't! So why are you claiming otherwise? You just don't know, do you.
That's a fair point and I'm not claiming anything. I'm just pointing that having absolute proof isn't required for personal belief.
No one cares what your far left website says. They offer zero evidence to back themselves up just like you.
Is that relevant? I mean the smear campaign against Trump maybe wouldn't have been necessary, but it was already in the works. Halper was already inside the campaign, and Steele and Ohr were putting the dossier together. "Insurance policy".
Yet you felt compelled to quote it and weakly tried to dismiss it. You have exposed a losing hand and impotent debate.
I don't see what point you're trying to make. Nor do I need the Trumpischer Boerbachter to describe an interview that I can see for myself without the media filter. I saw the interview, and I am well versed in what Clapper said (even when he said it the first time). BTW, this is not the first time that right wingers have falsely tried to claim that the "fundamental right for Americans to elect their leaders." absolved those elected from the rule of law, or from removal if they turn out to have committed high crimes and misdemeanors This is obviously and patently false. We don not elect kings or dictators, and we don't have patience for wannabe tyrants. And most of the people high fiving this idiotic nonsense were yelling the exact opposite in 1999, when the Republcians were busy trying to remove a sitting President (one who actually handily won the popular vote, unlike Trump, who has yet to ever get 50% of the vote in any contested election).