If Trump was the pal of Putin the way you suppose, why is Trump making Putin angry when he punishes Putin? Did you believe Clinton was Saddam's pal by punishing him too?
You're half right. The other half is: there's no proof that Russians meddling didn't change the outcome of the 2016 election.
Please. It's impossible for you or anyone else to say the fake ads had no impact. I specifically recall otherwise. And I specifically recall a fake ad about late term abortion being the deciding factor for a friend of mine. Your article proves nothing
I at least have a study done by Congress. You have nothing to support your laughable tin foil hat conspiracy theory just as I said.
Why is "patriotism" off topic all of a sudden? Or are you bristling because Clapper, like Brennan will have his clearance revoked? Susan Rice, also in line for revocation will take to cable news and defend the serial liars, per HER usual lies. It was Clapper who eased the CIA rules on unmasking, and Rice who took full political advantage. "Patriots" one and all. All of these "patriots" used their clearance to illegally spy on their "enemy list" while still employed as "public servants". Time to revoke every clearance still held by the deposed, corrupt, swamp dwelling "patriots".
Trump has little choice because of congressional action, intelligence findings, and public concern. He is thinking about canceling the sanctions on one oligarch. I don't remember Clinton sidling up to Sadaam nor did he punish him by lobbing a few missiles into the desert.
Bullshit. My claim is that your claim is not only impossible to prove, it's idiotic. Claiming hegemony over the minds of millions of americans to stake a claim that not one vote was changed is stupid. You can't prove it. The study you posted shows not one vote was changed - at the ballot box. My claim is that those votes were changes -before- they ever got to the ballot box, by lying and sowing discord. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/07/us/politics/russia-facebook-twitter-election.html You cannot make the claim you make in such a vociferous, blanket, insidious manner.
He sure is. He must be making his living off said clearance, because he is now threatening to sue over it. Not for himself, keep in mind, but for others...he has such heart. Suing over lost clearance, and trying to desperately frame it as an attack on free speech. No one needs a clearance to take advantage of their free speech rights. What he is saying is he'll cost America more money, and go the liberal judge routine, tied up in courts until he eventually loses. Just going to waste the Nations resources and courtroom time on a tantrum he knows he can't possibly win. It's not a free speech issue at all. More dilution of the word and concept of "rights" from the Left. https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/msn/...p-over-stripped-security-clearance/ar-BBM8dkl
Poor John. I guess he just figured out that his only remaining credibility was some BS assumption that he still had real access. The removal of his clearance cuts him off from the information he chose to leak anyway. So, he's cut off. Good riddance. He isn't being shut up. He's being cut off from the only thing he relies on for his income, information. And now he can't be trusted to keep it safe, he's out. Good riddance.
Brennan is the topic, try to focus. Brennan is an American patriot, like Comey, like Mueller and they are apolitical. What are the legal/legitimate grounds to revoke Brennan's clearance or was this merely to distract from the Amorasa (?) fiasco and the maybe continue to interfere with the Mueller investigation? Try to keep up with the topic, tks.
I didn't vote for Trump because of an ad that the Russians posted. I voted for Trump because I would never vote for Hillary. Do you understand that simple fact? Stop making excuses for why your horrible candidate lost.
I don't doubt for a minute that what you say is true. What I do say is you can not speak for the rest of the people that voted for trump.
And you can't assume you know why some people voted for Trump and why some people voted for crooked Hillary.
I believe Brennan served with distinction R and D Administrations in different capacities. Can you prove he is not apolitical?