READ: Vanessa Tyson's full statement on allegations against Lt. Gov. Justin Fairfax

LOL. She consented to some of it. Of course she knows.
Doesn't change the fact, she is claiming something more, without ever filing a police report. It is nothing but he said/she said. And to defend one and condemn the other is the definition of hypocrisy. Especially if one does so because of the political leaning.

 

A kiss...not forcible sodomey, why do dem men think a kids means it’s ok to rape?

 

Ask Kavenaugh. They both likely have the same answer.

 

Her statement, which details the time and the place has MORE credibility than Fords accusation which were void of any such details. Don't you agree? The Democrats said the Ford's accusation as baseless as it was was enough to disqualify Kavanaugh. Now they say a more credible accusation is not enough to disqualify Fairfax. There is the hypocracy.
My opinion is Tyson needs more corroboration for her accusation as I said with Ford, no hypocracy.

 

I thought that according to the Democrats once the woman says no from that point on it is sexual assault. But as noted her statement has more credibility because Fairfax openly admits he enticed her into the hotel room.

When did it become "sexual", at what point?

 

That was investigated and Dr. Ford was found incrediable. Clearly a hoax by the left in a failed attempt to derail the Admin. This story, Dr. Tyson actually remembers the time, and place where it took place. She is a member of the same political party....he story is to the point, and clear...and frankly horrible. What a sick man Fairfax is.

 

What a jackass accusation of sexism, but that's no surprise coming from you.

 

It’s rather obvious what you were attempting to suggest in your post.

 

Oh, you mean the quickie "investigation" by the GOP? A number of observers found Ford credible. On balance, I believe her, but there isn't enough corroboration to have us conclude Kavanaugh shouldn't have been given the benefit of the doubt.

Yet, she told no one at the time by her own admission, nor has she any corroborating evidence other than Fairfax' admission they were involved. Like Kavanaugh, Fairfax deserves the benefit of the doubt.

Please, don't ever sit on a jury.

 

Quickie? The FBI had a week, the Senate had months....they crossed examined him twice, and her once. Nobody she claimed as witnesses supported her story.

Her story is far more detailed, far more crediable...then you have Fairfax saying "f that b" - clearly highlighting how he feels about women.

 

There was no rush. They should have taken the air out of the Democrats' claims by letting the FBI investigate until they were done.

 

Mindless partisanship is what you're all about.

 

Yeah, I thought I was pretty clear about the way you operate.

 

No one supported her claim it was Kavanaugh, if that's what you mean.

Again, she told no one at the time by her own admission. Without corroborating evidence, her claim isn't enough for us to conclude he's guilty as charged.

 

You're the one that called it a "quickie GOP investigation" when in reality the FBI conducted an investigation for a week....and that was after months long investigation by the Senate bipartisan committee.

 

This isn't a Court of law. He isn't charged with anything. Her story is far more crediable then Dr. Ford....he isnt fit for office.

 

They were done as they said. They investigated and interviewed all of her alleged witnesses and the fact that she could not even say when or where it happened or anyone she actually told about it left them nothing else to investigate. Rape is not a crime they investigate anyway it's not a federal crime. But do list all the evidence that proved or supported her allegation.

 

No one supported her claim about the party and the sexual assault she claimed.

That wasn't required for the Democrats to label Kavanaugh a sexual assaulter and announce him guilty. So they have no choice but to treat Fairfax equally else explain why they should support Ford but no Tyson.

How about Paula Jones, she had three contemporaneous witnesses including the woman who was working with her that day and witnessed Danny Ferguson coming and telling Jones the Governor wanted to meet with her would she please follow him and then the 20 minutes later when she returned and she witnessed her demeanor and was told what had just happened.

 

So you believe Tyson too because her statement has more credibility. And that is all we have for both, their statements.

 

Had the Washington Post not sat on this story before last year's elections in Virginia he might not be in office.

 

Very true...you can't trust the leftist propaganda machines.

 

Now hang on a minute. You find it odd that in a private conversation he expressed hatred of his accuser? And you find that to be out of character for someone falsely accused?

Frankly I find it non-relevant: If he is a rapist he'd have that attitude, and if he's being railroaded I'd expect that attitude as well.


How would YOU react to someone accusing you of forcible sodomy?

 

Nobody has accused me of forcible sodomy...I respect women. I also don't call them the b word...but that's just me, I'm not a member of the DNC

 

Don't be obtuse, you know what a hypothetical is.

If someone were to falsely accuse you of forcible sodomy, then tear you down in the press years later with the story, which of the following descriptors would best describe your reaction in private: 1) anger 2) derision 3) scorn 4) sanguinity 5) calm 6) kindness 7) understanding 8 ) equanimity. Pick any or all that apply.

 

calm and concerned....I wouldn't call anyone a b word...I'd be curious why I was falsely accused because I would never do such a thing. Fairfax's response sounds like someone that dislikes women quite a bit and would treat them poorly