Congress will see Barr's redacted version of the Mueller Report

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Sandy Shanks, Mar 29, 2019.

  1. Sandy Shanks

    Sandy Shanks Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2016
    Messages:
    26,679
    Likes Received:
    6,470
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I knew you would think so. You people prove my point every time.
     
  2. Sandy Shanks

    Sandy Shanks Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2016
    Messages:
    26,679
    Likes Received:
    6,470
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gee, you really think so?

    I'm going go out on limb here. I bet you voted for Trump.
     
  3. PatriotNews

    PatriotNews Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2008
    Messages:
    27,756
    Likes Received:
    3,715
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The Art of the Deal baby! Maybe it was a bluff for the morons on the 9th Circuit Court.

    :roflol::roflol::roflol::roflol:

     
  4. Sandy Shanks

    Sandy Shanks Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2016
    Messages:
    26,679
    Likes Received:
    6,470
    Trophy Points:
    113
    "If some of those efforts appeared on the surface to be helpful to anyone, that would be pure happenstance."

    Did you say that with a straight face? So, you and Trump both feel that our intell agencies were wrong.

    If Trump was help by WikiLeaks disclosures, that was purely by accident. :roflol::rolleyes:

    Trump's fans are so much fun.
     
  5. Sandy Shanks

    Sandy Shanks Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2016
    Messages:
    26,679
    Likes Received:
    6,470
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gee, are there sanctuary cities and Democrats in Mexico?
     
    Nemesis likes this.
  6. Nemesis

    Nemesis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2012
    Messages:
    17,226
    Likes Received:
    9,529
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yeah, those highly-educated and experienced judges are so dumb. You know the law and they don't.

    *LOL*
     
  7. Sandy Shanks

    Sandy Shanks Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2016
    Messages:
    26,679
    Likes Received:
    6,470
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Politico reports, "While most of official Washington is on edge ahead of the expected release of special counsel Robert Mueller’s full report, Trump White House aides are shrugging off the fevered anticipation with a simple message: been there, done that."

    Covering for Trump has become a daily chore for White House aides.

    "Several of President Donald Trump’s aides conceded that the nearly 400-page report, which Attorney General Bill Barr says he’s aiming to release this coming week, will likely include new details about Trump’s behavior that are at a minimum embarrassing."

    Right, embarrassing.

    “In 400 pages there’s bound to be something the media will spin as embarrassing for the president and then that will be the story,” said a White House official, “but will it be collusion? Will it be obstruction? Will it be conspiracy? Will it be criminality? No, no, no and no.”

    Really, does the official already know what is in the Mueller Report, or is this just another lie from the White House? No doubt the latter because ...

    Politico adds, "Even as more than a dozen Trump aides and associates interviewed by POLITICO professed confidence that the report would inflict little new damage on a president they say has already been exonerated by Barr, some Trump allies say the White House is in for a rude awakening.

    "The confetti and streamers that followed Barr’s letter last month were “completely unfounded,” said a former White House official, who called his former colleagues “blissfully unaware of what’s to come.”'

    https://www.politico.com/story/2019/04/13/trump-mueller-report-1273823
     
  8. TOG 6

    TOG 6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Messages:
    47,848
    Likes Received:
    19,639
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Look at you, unable to address the truth.
     
  9. TOG 6

    TOG 6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Messages:
    47,848
    Likes Received:
    19,639
    Trophy Points:
    113
    "[T]he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities."
    - Robert Mueller
     
  10. CourtJester

    CourtJester Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2013
    Messages:
    27,769
    Likes Received:
    4,921
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So do you or do you not think the hacking supposedly carried on by Gussifer2 was actually done by Russia. A simple yes or no will suffice.

    Oh, and fact isn't an insult!
     
  11. Robert

    Robert Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2014
    Messages:
    68,085
    Likes Received:
    17,138
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    This issue must be decided by a court of law.

    Until all facts are verified in a courtroom, it is pure conjecture at this point.
     
  12. CourtJester

    CourtJester Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2013
    Messages:
    27,769
    Likes Received:
    4,921
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So the fact that clearly members of the Trump team colluded with various Russian agents doesn't prove the link between those Russians and the Russian government. Or to put it simply Mueller couldn't tie the individual Russians to the Russian government.
     
    Robert likes this.
  13. CourtJester

    CourtJester Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2013
    Messages:
    27,769
    Likes Received:
    4,921
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So let me try to understand. Facts are not facts till a court rules. And the findings of American security agencies don't count unless we can somehow take Russia to court?
     
  14. Robert

    Robert Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2014
    Messages:
    68,085
    Likes Received:
    17,138
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    What do you mean they colluded?
     
  15. Robert

    Robert Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2014
    Messages:
    68,085
    Likes Received:
    17,138
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Let me give you a for instance.

    Charges were leveled at D Robert Menendez by law officers who then took him to trial.

    Their assertions did not satisfy the court so it voided any so called facts.

    The same soup is served to all who get charged.

    Menendez was to get a new trial until the officials decided not to try him again.

    So is he still guilty of charges that thus far have not been proven to the court?
     
  16. CourtJester

    CourtJester Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2013
    Messages:
    27,769
    Likes Received:
    4,921
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I guess you are right. Violating the Constitution is I guess different from breaking the law.

    And no evidence of any nature will convince a true believer. Bet you can't even admit that Trump has ever lied. Even such obvious lies as his claiming his father was born in Germany can I guess be dismissed. Or his biggest ever innaugural. Or his vlaim to be worth ten billion. Or his really stupid claim that North Korea is mo longer a nuclear threat. Etc,etc,etc.
     
  17. CourtJester

    CourtJester Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2013
    Messages:
    27,769
    Likes Received:
    4,921
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sorry but I am not going to restate every finding and conviction of the Mueller investigation. You have to put in a bit of your own effort.
     
    Last edited: Apr 14, 2019
  18. Robert

    Robert Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2014
    Messages:
    68,085
    Likes Received:
    17,138
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I remind you that our intelligence agencies were positive that Saddam had WMD too.
     
  19. Robert

    Robert Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2014
    Messages:
    68,085
    Likes Received:
    17,138
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    That is a easy way to duck out.

    I will show it to be the hardest way though.

    We can study each of the convictions. Which of them proved collusion with Russia?
    Name any?

    Bearing mind it was about changing an election of the USA.
     
  20. RodB

    RodB Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2015
    Messages:
    22,567
    Likes Received:
    11,227
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Robert likes this.
  21. Robert

    Robert Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2014
    Messages:
    68,085
    Likes Received:
    17,138
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Who violated the constitution? Show the part you want us to rely on? This is not about me or him or other posters. I almost replied back to you in kind but caught my comment so i erased all of it.

    It is easy to try to make it personal vs other posters. I am trying to watch it myself.
    You have issues with Trump.

    For one thing, did you vote for him?
    I have myself puzzled over him saying his father was born in Germany. I wonder if he meant to say his grandfather? Do you cut him any slack at all?

    The media instantly attacked him for crowd size. But the crowd he spoke of was not merely on the mall, but he added in internet watchers I saw it on the internet myself.
    Is his worth less? Can you prove it to us?

    Can you produce documents proving north Korea is actually a viable nuclear threat?
     
    RodB likes this.
  22. RodB

    RodB Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2015
    Messages:
    22,567
    Likes Received:
    11,227
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I cannot say they were wrong, but I do disagree with their speculations, which is what their surmising that the Russians interfered to help Trump is.
     
  23. Robert

    Robert Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2014
    Messages:
    68,085
    Likes Received:
    17,138
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
  24. RodB

    RodB Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2015
    Messages:
    22,567
    Likes Received:
    11,227
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I have no proof one way or another. Neither does anyone else. Maybe Russia was behind it, maybe not. But I don't see how that matters. It clearly does not suggest it was done for the conscious purpose to help Trump.

    Oh, and fact isn't an insult![/QUOTE]"Your ignorance is your issue." Insult or fact???
     
  25. RodB

    RodB Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2015
    Messages:
    22,567
    Likes Received:
    11,227
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Doubling down on a losing hand, eh?? Didn't have a law broken so you just reached into your bag of memes and myths and pulled out violating the Constitution.
     

Share This Page