Trump ended the rule blocking mentally ill people from getting guns.

Except you are fully aware that they aren’t weapons of war, or ever intended to be. Which is why no military on earth issues them.

 

Except that you, rahl, know they are weapons of war, having been intended as such.

 

No one present in the discussion is speaking about nuclear weaponry except for yourself. No rifle is comparable to nuclear devices.

And yet countless millions of private individuals in the united states who currently possess such firearms, are managing to refrain from engaging in mass murder, and instead are engaged in legal firearms usage with such.

And before the argument attempted on the part of yourself tries to claim the number of such firearms cannot possibly be that high, think again:

https://www.cnbc.com/2016/06/13/own...nder-renewed-fire-after-orlando-massacre.html

"Sales have been brisk for U.S. gun makers in the last decade. The number of total firearms made topped 10 million in 2013, the latest data available from the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms. That's more than double the industry's output in 2008."

The number of just AR-15 rifles in private ownership was over ten million six years ago. Add in every other firearm that is classified as a so-called "assault weapon" and that number becomes significantly higher.

Then the responsibility was on the part of yourself to specify such.

Such pertains exclusively to the fully-automatic AK-47 rifle that is produced abroad in various countries. The semi-automatic AK-47 rifle available in the united states, and marketed under a number of different titles, can only be set to safe or semi-automatic.

This is the safety selector of a fully-automatic AK-47.





Do note it has three positions and even includes markings to demonstrate such.

This is the safety selector of a semi-automatic AK-47 rifle.



Do note it has exactly two positions, with no middle position for fully-automatic capabilities, thus rendering it semi-automatic only in functionality.

 

Semi-automatic firearms with detachable magazines have been available to the general public since the start of the twentieth century. Even the same types of semi-automatic firearms the united states military eventually adopted for general issue. Thus nothing on that particular matter has actually changed. The only thing that has changed is the perception of society, but that perception is immaterial and irrelevant since it is devoid of fact.

 

Which the united state supreme court has already ruled against. It has stated that the criminal misuse of a firearm is not a legitimate reason to restrict the legal use, ownership, and acquisition of such firearms.

 

In that case, no registered democrat should be allowed to own a weapon.

 

You realize that explanation of the most basics in firearms is a futile effort when talking to libs right?

 

This and other posts demonstrate the liberal belief in thought crimes - as Orwell wrote about.

 

so you think fanatical racists should be cops?

 

semi-auto hunting rifles can be made into automatic machine guns with a rubber band or the belt trick.

a group of civilians with these AR-15s can deputize a militia and train for gorilla tactics like the military does

 

You just can't win this. They were designed for war, whether they are no longer used by militaries.

You can't get around it.

 

Same here..I have no tolerance for men with small “weapons” fighting for guns that can kill people in seconds, You know the same guys that think everyone who supports gun control must be a feminist. Obviously we have different values. You worship the gun and I care about the victims of mass shootings

 

The gun nuts!

 

I love the uneducated when they make statements like you have to hate men in order to want regulations on guns that can kill dozens less than a minute...you only hate the people who care about the victims... obviously

 

We should let them die....preferably on a stage so we can enjoy watching them die

 

Keep thinking that cupcake. We’re all laughing at you.

 

Has anyone on the left figured out yet that Trump did not end a rule blocking mentally ill from getting guns which is already law but that he overturned Obama's overreach to include people not mentally unfit to own a gun?

 

Oh I love it. Trump all the way. Calling someone a stupid childish term and then including “we” because they need to feel they have back up. That’s the definition of a bully. Are you a bleached blonde also?

 

Except you are demonstrably incorrect. You’ve been shown over and over and over again that none of those rifles were designed for, nor are they used by a single military unit on the face of the planet.

 

No, you don’t care about them at all. Your only interest in this forum, as evidence by your posts, is ranting incessantly about bullshit feminist nonsense.

 

But that had been thoroughly proven false, as you are fully aware. None of the firearms we are discussing were designed for, or used by any military on earth.