Vindman struggles to explain why he used "demand" when questioned

I heard on my morning news that the Ukrainian born Vindman was questioned how he came about to use the word "demand' in his opening statement and struggled to come up with an answer.

The Ukrainian born Vindman is just another Trump-hating deep-state liar looking for his 15 minutes of fame.

The Democrats and these fake witnesses are liars and are trying to undo a duly elected President because they have no chance of winning at the 2020 ballot box with the current crop of clown car Democratic candidates.

 

I heard on my morning news that Vindman is a purple heart recipient and a true patriot who holds love for the United States above any sense of blind loyalty to donald trump.

 

Translation:

Some right wing radio dude pulled something from his ass and you decided it smelled good ... whatever.

 

I heard on my morning news that Vindman was born in Ukraine and speaks Ukrainian.

 

Democrats leaking information: factual and correct
Republicans leaking information: not factual and not correct

Got it!

 

If the fricking Democrats would have conducted these hearings in public, then we would not have to rely on leaked information, now would we????

 

They’ll be testifying in public soon enough. Then you’ll complain about that lol

 

And the witnesses are going to be torn apart. They are going to look like a bunch of partisan tools.

 

Seriously? Pot, meet kettle!

 

If they are partisan tools, then what they say will be easily disproven. Why are you so worried?

 

Seriously!

 

I'm not worried, but you should be.

I can't wait until these witnesses are cross examined and discredited during a public hearing.

 

Why should I be worried? I want the truth to come out. And if the truth includes reason for Trump to be impeached he should be impeached. I’ve never supported impeachment without cause. As such, if there’s no cause to impeach, I lose nothing.
Just seems, in your case, like you’re a bit worried for Trump and are reassuring yourself by making claims of what’s to happen that you can’t possibly back up with fact.

 

Why should I be worried? I want the truth to come out, but with closed door hearings and Democrats coaching and tampering with the witnesses, the truth is obfuscated.

Just seems, in your case, like you’re a bit worried for the Senate trial and are reassuring yourself by relying on witnesses' interpretation and personal opinion opposed to actually what happened.

 

Trump lied when he said the transcript that was released was a verbatim accounting of the conversation with Zelensky. He wasn't under oath or it could be added to the list of impeachable offenses. It was just a routine lie............the kind he tells every day.............the kind Trumpette's just shrug and say, "I don't care if he lies.........cuz he is my Dear Leader who I hold to a hypocritically different standard than anyone else."

 

Where's the proof that the transcript is NOT verbatim????

 

You must have been listening to fake news.

The decorated Iraq War veteran that has served the nation with distinction for two decades did not struggle at all.

 

How do you know? Were you there?

 

Were you?

The decorated US Army Lt. Colonel's devastating testimony had Trump bum kissers desperate.

​

Representative John "The Rat" Ratcliffe asked why Vindman believed Trump's demanding a "favor" from Zelinsky was a demand.

Vindman explained to the Trump toady that, when the most powerful person in the world asks the president of a country on the brink, such as Ukraine, to do something for him, while vital military aid is being withheld, he's going to do it.

 

So, you weren't there and were just making crap up. Good to know.

And why does it matter if Vindman is a decorated US Army Lt. Colonel???

It doesn't matter!

Vindman can still be a Ukrainian spy and a traitor.

 

Shift is the kind of person who tries to call time out in a street fight.

It doesn't work that way. You can do it that way, but you're still going to get your butt kicked.

 

Such as, "I heard on my morning news that the Ukrainian born Vindman was questioned how he came about to use the word 'demand' in his opening statement and struggled to come up with an answer"?

If you believe that it is necessary to smear the impressive American patriot, you must entertain such nonsense, I suppose.

 

So, what I heard on the news was not true?

There have been plenty of military personnel who were convicted of spying.

 

Let me explain something to you. This is based on twenty years in the military plus being associated with the military most of my life. Being a Lt Col with a purple heart and chest full of medals does not automatically make him an authority on anything. He can have agendas just like anyone else.

It would like me standing out in the open during a mortar and rocket attack in Vietnam with the hope of getting wounded so that I could become an authority. Base you opinion on what he says and does and not by his outward trappings.

I can respect his service without automatically believing what he says

 

Obviously if you cannot provide a link to verify your pretense, I have no idea whether such a claim was ever broadcast or by whom.

I could just as easily claim that I have seen irrefutable evidence that Fake Don was renowned for his pas de deux when he performed for the Kirov, and you might also question that.

Your suggestion that the decorated war hero is a spy is obviously not based upon any evidence, but your desperate need to denigrate a credible witness to your bonespurs messiah's perfidy.