Melania Trump booed at youth opioid summit in Baltimore

How do you know that he "means positive harm to most of us?" And what is that "harm?"

 

Obama had a speechwriter - does that mean that he is a robot devoid of any and all responsibility?

 

So you are saying that SHE plagiarised? Earlier you said that you do not blame her for her speech.

 

I examine his policies and I study his life. He means to establish a white nationalist and extremely authoritarian regime in this country

 

And what is your evidence for that? Do you have even a SHRED of evidence?

 

No, I don't think he would. He was running against him for the Presidency

No, I'm talking about just what I said. I think anti-abortionists should offer to pay the medical expenses for any woman who would have an abortion otherwise, with possibly a stipend added on. In exchange the mother would agree to let them adopt the child. I think many childless couples could easily and would gladly offer to finance such a fund and it could be supplemented from many sources.

I think you should apply Occam's Razor, and maybe stop trolling.

 

I submit all his policies and all his actions as evidence. I invite you to study them and draw your own conclusions.

 

Name ONE 'white nationalist policy' if you are even REMOTELY capable of doing so.

 

And you would say that surely one of the reasons that Perot didn't trust Clinton was because he cheated on his wife, right?

But it would specifically be childless couples who are anti-abortionists?

How the hell am I trolling?

 

How about several google pages


https://www.google.com/search?q=tru...&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&safe=active&ssui=on

 

Not one single policy was mentioned in that results page! The first two results were about Stephen Miller! Sorry, but you can't be taken seriously.

 

I would guess.

I don't see why it would have to be childless couples exclusively, Anybody against abortion could contribute

I think you are being purposefully obtuse.

 

Trump's keeping such an outspoken white nationalist as Miller on his staff is surely an important and far reaching POLICY of his in this regard, so that's one, the several web PAGES that each point to Trump's white nationalism were just thrown in for effect.

 

I'm not the one making a claim without being able to back it up! Can you actually back it up? Come on, just ONE SINGLE 'white supremacist' POLICY, if you are even REMOTELY capable of stating one!

 

Okay, but you don't think that Clinton's cheating is a reason to distrust him?

Why couldn't pro-lifers contribute?

LOL - why, because I don't accept that the reason that people are against same sex marriage is to do with gay sex? Come on! Be serious!

 

Not in matters of public policy, no. Clinton's cheating is a matter of being unable to resist temptation, not an uncommon failing, and not really that indicative of someone who is unconcerned about his wife's feelings. You could still trust him in matters unrelated to his marital relations. Trump's cheating was purposeful and showed him to be an uncaring reprobate, someone who does what is best for HIM with no care for anyone else, even those he is expected to love. Why would anyone trust such a person?

Don't you mean pro-choicers and yes. anybody could. I think such funds already exist and the fact that most pro-lifers don't contribute to them as their exclusive efforts against abortion shows their real agenda

Yes, basically for just that reason. Why in the Seven Levels of Gehenna do you think people get married at all if it's NOT for sex?

 

So then you disagree with Perot.

Yes, typo.

What, you mean government funds

WTF? Since when do people need to get married in order to have sex?

 

Yes, but I see his reasoning

I have the same problem.

No, I didn't say Government funds

They don't, but the Republican Party is still against gay marriage. and that seems repression for the sake of repression to me.

 

So you're only against men cheating if the wife is pregnant at the time? You cannot be serious! It means that you can be FOR Clinton's cheating but against Trump's! Oh how convenient!

Well what funds do you think you've heard of? You at least know that they're not government.

Aren't you saying that people get married for sex?

 

Convenient but true. Clinton succumbed to temptation while his wife was absent. Trump went out of his way to hire a prostitute while his wife really needed him. It is a rather clear case of false equivalence to say the two are the same.

No, i am saying that Republicans are against gay marriage because gay marriage NECESSARILY means that gay sex is going on, and to approve of gay marriage would imply an approval of gay sex and this is why Republicans are against it.

Keep in mind gay sex WAS once against the law in this country, and Republicans would like to see it be that way again

 

My criticism is of the Trump fans who falsely gave her credit for being original. Her speach was fine it just wasn't original.

 

I concede that the two are not equivalent, meaning that one is immoral, and the other is EXTRA immoral! However, you seem to believe that Clinton wasn't immoral AT ALL for his cheating! This is an INSANE double standard! Boy, you must REALLY be a big Clinton supporter! I've never heard ANYONE defend him in this outrageous and biased manner!

Gay RELATIONSHIPS necessarily means that gay sex is going on! That doesn't become somehow more true just because of gay marriage. Your opinion is utterly baseless, just admit it.

Name ONE SINGLE Republican politician who wants gay sex to be illegal, if you are even REMOTELY capable of doing so!

 

You mean they falsely gave her credit after it was revealed that certain parts were clearly copied?

 

I assume so @PARTIZAN1.

 

It is true that Trump fans totally disregarded the fact that she plagerized or worse yet they claimed that she did not plagerize . They should have just praised her for talking and let dead dogs lay where they fell.