Trump may give you a glass of water for backing his view that the Iranian missile strikes are not meant to kill US soldiers.
Can you make another one of your amazingingly(inaccurate) predictions of doom and gloom and let me know a timeframe for when I should expect this missile rain to arrive? Look, my prediction came true already!
Please stop embarrassing yourself. Nobody cares that Iran managed to smash up a few buildings. 176 innocent people are dead because of Iran's incompetence with weapons, and here you are bragging about Iran's amazing ability to take out an empty building and make a crater in a soybean field. It's just ridiculous.
Just loiter around any US air base in Iraq all the while, and you will be caught in a "missile rain" one day. Using an analogy, if you want to have the experience of being eaten by a crocodile, you just jump into a crocodile-infested river in Australia.
You really think Iran would be stupid enough to pull the same "missile rain" trick again after how embarrassingly and tragically dismal the last one turned out? You may be right. The Iranian regime is nothing if not incredibly stupid.
Better analogy- If you want to experience being beaten by the Basij, you just jump into a protestor-infested street in Iran.
Whether you believe your so-called the Iranian regime is stupid or not, you can loiter around in Iraq or Iran wearing a T-shirt with the words: "I am an American supporting the Trump regime."
If you like to jump into a street, there is no need for you to go to Iran. You can jump down from a skyscraper in New York.
Pff.... You think the Iranian government cares about collateral damage? It only cares about one thing... getting the US military out of Iraq, so they get Iraq under their control.
My great friend - you did not reply to my post linked to below. That's very disappointing. Was it too much? http://www.politicalforum.com/index...missile-strikes.566723/page-3#post-1071336010
Why? Let's say that warning was given that a town was going to be attacked by missiles and the entire town was evacuated. Why exactly would it matter that a missile was unable to be pin pointed to a specific building? Well it could be guaranteed in the above scenario. However, if the entire town was evacuated apart from a group of people in one building and one single missile was fired into the town - even though it would be pretty unlikely that the building containing the people is hit, nobody could guarantee zero casualties.
The reasons why Iran didn't want to harm U.S. personnel in their missile strike are fear and common sense.
Fear of what exactly? Fear that your criminal IMPOTUS would irrationally begin WW3 because he has zero impulse control? Common sense that they are dealing with an immature ignoramus who is both stupid and arrogant enough to launch nuclear missiles?
Wow, so much misinformation in one post. You must really be proud. First, the US picked up on chatter from the Iranians about the impending strike. Our satellites, observed the Iranians could be seen loading the rockets into the launchers. (BTW, CNN asked why the US did not take out the launchers before they were launched. Of course, if we had, then CNN would be whining about a preemptive strike.) One of the most telling notifications came when the Iranians notified the Iraqi's of the impending attack. It is my belief that they told the Iraqi's about the intention to avoid casualties and damage. Based on that information, the US decided not to deploy the Patriot and THADD batteries. So, both the US stories seem to jive. Next is the downing of the Ukrainian Airliner. Prior to the attacks, All countries were notified not to enter Iranian or Iraqi airspace during the attack. The Ukrainian aircraft was at the Tehran Airport when the all clear was given. The Aircraft was cleared for takeoff. The aircraft left the Tehran Airport. It was in the process of gaining altitude, and the transponder was squawking a Ukrainian Civilian Commercial aircraft code. So, there was no reason for this aircraft to be shot down accidentally or not . Given the fact that Iran has announced that they had arrested those responsible tells me that this was not unintentional. Don't forget that the Iranian Government initially claimed that it was mechanical problems that brought down the plane. One even went so far as to claim that it was scientifically impossible for the aircraft to have been taken out by a SAM. It was not until the video that showed the incident got out that they changed their story. Iran was under pressure from it's citizens to do something to retaliate against the death of the Quad Leader, but they did not want to cross Trump's line in the sand again. So, the staged a pseudo attack. What you can expect next is a new round of sanctions against Iran. If President Trump includes freezing the Oil Revenues, then the Iranian Economy will collapse. Because of that, I believe that Iran will meet with the US to draw up a new Iran Nuke deal that will end their program.
Your ad hom's are clearly noted as well as you capitulation of allowing one branch of government to have more control over all other branches!
More importantly, why not just nuke the btch (Iran) End of tyranny, end of the Mullahs, end of terrorism, and a bright new dawn over a future of peace and prosperity. I don’t know, call me crazy, but I like it. ( Straightened out Japan—they became a world economic power. Can’t beat that.)
crossed Trump's red line and Trump did nothing, thank goodness both sides backed off, war would have been good for neither side