You spectacularly DODGED my challenge to you regarding genocide in another country. I took that to mean that you're not a horrible person and would in fact care about it, but admitting that would destroy your own argument that one should only care about issues in their country.
What the hell is wrong with you? I clearly said "many women are sexist towards men!" As in, that's the ONLY way that they can be sexist logically speaking.
I didn't dodge anything. How about you fix the abortion issue in your own country before you start worrying about other countries? Are you on forums in every other country that has abortions? Somehow I doubt it.
Yes. They exist. It's no different than someone hating their own race of people or hating others with the same sexuality. Why do you think that's funny?
FoxHastings said: ↑ LOL, you JUST posted : "Of course women can be sexist - many women are sexist towards men."" in the post before that One !!!!!!! DON'T YOU read what YOU wrote ???!! Your "logic' doesn't matter. A sexist is one who discriminates and stereotypes based on sex. BOTH men and women can be sexist.
FoxHastings said: ↑ LOL, you JUST posted : "Of course women can be sexist - many women are sexist towards men."" in the post before that One !!!!!!! DON'T YOU read what YOU wrote ???!! What in the hell is wrong with you ? Your "logic' doesn't matter. A sexist is one who discriminates and stereotypes based on sex. BOTH men and women can be sexist....DUH
Only men can be sexist towards women. THAT'S my point. You however, think that women can be sexist towards women!
Somehow I doubt that you would ever refer to a woman's 2nd Amendment right as simply, a woman's right. If in a gun thread, someone said that the 2nd amendment should be repealed, I highly doubt that you would say as you did regarding abortion, "you’re for taking away a woman’s right. You’re extreme" or even you’re for taking away a person's right. You’re extreme.
Yes, it's certainly a difficult argument to make that this has the same value as a living human. Someone who argues this would presumably be against the birth control pill. So you've gone to that extreme and I've answered, so let's go to the opposite extreme - 35 hours PRIOR to birth - does it have the same value as a living human?
I would say darn close... I think good moral arguments can be made at significant brain function roughly 24 weeks. more-over - the legal arguments become sounder - yet still not making the bar given the attitude of the people.
Again, it's her body, her choice! The baby MUST be aborted no matter WHEN she wants it aborted! It seems that you DO NOT actually believe this!
They exist. It's no different than someone hating their own race of people or hating others with the same sexuality. Why do you think that's funny?
You appear to have missed this: http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/why-kill-the-innocent.569050/page-16#post-1071951469
My answer is directly related to your question. Your question was: to which I replied: The times have changed and more and more women have become independent and are willing to carry a baby to term with or without the baby's father. That changed the "rules". I don't advocate violence and I think being shot in the head is a bit harsh.
Yes, I did miss it. My apologies. My answer is below: It can be one or the other or both. I still don't understand why you think a woman cannot be sexist against other women.