Are you kidding me? Just last week the post office messed up a forwarding order, sent client checks back to them as undeliverable and told them a PO box was invalid because they couldn't handle a simple forwarding order. The post office is GROSSLY incompetent.
If your state will have in-person polls and you want to vote in person, go for it. But your in-person vote will likely be provisional until thay verify that you haven't already voted by mail. If you do attempt both, you will most likely be charged with a federal crime. You could go to jail, pay a fine, and lose your right to vote. This is what Trump is telling his base to do. If you believe he's on the up-and-up, or even has a clue about the consequences, go for it, do both, then come back and tell us how that went. That is, if they have internet/web access in your local federal prison.
Really? Do please explain how you've come to that conclusion. Because the only ballot-by-mail attempt at fraudin this centure so farwas the Republicans inNC in 2018, and theygotcaught, bigly.
How many didn't get caught? You can't answer that. But with all of the known cases, cheat-by-mail is definitely fraught with risk.
I don't know how its possible after this has been explained many times already that you still dont get it. If you go to the poll - and your are still on the voting list - that means your mail in ballot has not been counted. You will get to vote by provisional ballot and your in person vote will supercede your mail in vote that has not yet been counted. Jesus H Christ what is so freakin hard about this to understand!
We can post lots of evidence that you folks will ignore - like the entire New Jersey election that was invalidated, lol.
I've continually asked for evidence, and every time I get a tiny handful of cases, at best, but mostly fake news like that whole thing about the cat getting a ballot.
If I post an example, will you admit being wrong? Your fallacy in thinking here is that vote-by-mail is not legal in most states, and therefore there are not YET widespread cases. But there are MANY cases. Simple fact.
The simple fact is that you are already shifting the goalposts. My claim is that there is no evidence of widespread voter fraud. No, there's nothing proving me wrong there.
Its simple. Those defending forced mail in ballots claiming there is nothing to worry about are now admitting there is something to worry about. If Trumps comment concerns you, you share Trumps concern.
Don't be snarky, please. That was uncalled for. After I thought about it a bit I realized you were talking about voter fraud charges. Excuse the eff outta me.
Link? And that's one incident, out of how many billions of pieces of mail? I don't think "grossly incompetent" applies. It was probably one person, too. Hyperbole.
Of good grief. Do you really believe that? Your hero Donald Trump is a moron, a liar, and a cheat. It's who he's always been. He's bamboozled his base. How can anyone with an IQ over 60 believe anything that comes out of that ugly little cake hole of his? He can't dazzle us with brilliance, so he chooses to baffle us with bullsh!t.
Emotional, partisan rants aside, if you have an issue with his comment, you are admitting to sharing his concerns.
Okay then, since you chose to be insulting, I'll give you some back. (Moderators, please note that I'm simply replying to someone who has used personal insults towards many users and fully deserves to get some back.) Every state has its own voting process. Google what NJ has planned before you attack others. And NJ isn't the only state planning the same. Try using logic instead of your extreme hate-based emotions. In some states, mail-in ballots must be received by election day. Some of those may not have been processed until that evening, so they would not be processed yet when you go in person to the polls. In some states, mail-in ballots must be postmarked on election day, and will not have been processed by the time you go to the polls. Is it so hard for you to actually think things through, maybe even look things up? Stupid is incurable, but in the information age, ignorance is a choice. Also, even I, an acknowledged atheist, can manage not taking the Christian lord's name in vain. I have better manners than that, and empathy enough to not want to offend Christians. Apparently, you're not a Christian, but try to muster up a little respect anyway.
Yeah, it depends on the state. In some states, it takes Democrats longer to rig the election than in others.