When did tRUMP denounce white supremacy? This quote from last nite says he has denounced, notice the past tense? Where's a quote to an actual denounciation? Can you be the 1st in America to show it?
Oh, I learned from you guys with your constant "But Obama" and "But Hillary" defenses. Oh, and what about the factory he inaugurated, which exists since the Obama administration, and the officials were all embarrassed and wouldn't contradict him in front of him? LOL
[QUOTE="gfm7175, post: 1072130149, member: 79153"You know, the people who are out rioting, looting, vandalizing, assaulting, and burning down portions of cities across America??[/QUOTE] So the cops? No rioting where the cops aren't out in force...
One claim by Biden at the town hall turns out to be a lie. Shocking. I’m telling [you] the boilermakers overwhelmingly endorse me, OK, so the boilermakers union has endorsed me because I sat down with them and went into great detail earlier to show their leadership exactly what I would do,” he said. However, the boilermakers union later said they haven’t endorsed any presidential candidate for the 2020 election.
No, I can't. Now, prove he has denounced white supremacy. Surely you have the time stamps or the written transcripts?
Not any more they aren't. Anarchists, BLM, Antifa, Communists, Bernie-bots - they all act like brownshirts, they all resort to violence and intimidation, they all "cancel" for thought-crime, they all suppress freedom of speech, they all riot, burn and loot, they all physically attack innocent civilians and the police alike. These are all fascist methods, but feel free to keep splitting hairs till you're blue in the face.
No, they don't "emulate both" and you would know why they don't if you knew what "anarchist" and "fascist" mean. He has condemned Antifa, so I'll set them aside and focus on Black Lives Matter. BLM are a protest organization. The vast majority of protests they organize are nonviolent and there's no evidence they encourage elements like Antifa that show up at the protests and cause problems. While I don't like what I suspect are their economic views--they've moved away from touting socialism--I don't think their protests deserve condemnation.
Nonsense #1.... he condemned generic violence, the words "I condemn Antifa" never left his lips. Hopefully he'll have his chance on Thursday, to unambiguously and without qualifiers utter in front of the entire nation that he condemns ANTIFA. Not holding my breath though. Nonsense #2 - BLM is as violent as Antifa. They riot, loot and burn together.
BLM takes part in the fascist anarchist riots and destruction and attacks on peaceful conservative protests and Biden refuses to condemn them. "In Tuesday night’s presidential debate in Cleveland, former Vice President Joe Biden said that violence is never “appropriate” but he did not condemn people who have been perpetrating it in cities across America. Taking the opportunity to address directly the antifa movement, Mr. Biden simply described its lack of centralized structure." https://www.wsj.com/articles/why-didnt-biden-condemn-antifa-and-bernie-sanders-11601586778
"Bernie-bots?" What in the hell is that? BLM organizes peaceful protests, so they can't reasonably be accused of "violence and intimidation." Antifa are violent leftwingers. Communists (CPUSA) often eschew violence, but I have no doubt they would employ violence if they thought it would serve their ends. Antifa and the CPUSA are real socialists (who advocate collectivizing production). Antifa and the CPUSA fashion themselves as revolutionary socialists. Fascists are rightwingers who use violence to get their way. If you study early 1930s Germany, there were street battles between fascists and communists. You wouldn't support Biden no matter what he says. He condemned Antifa by name and the use of violence by anyone. That's BS. By far most BLM rallies are peaceful and those few that turn violent are invaded by the like of Antifa and street criminals.
Guilty as charged. nothing personal though, I would not support any democrat (former B.Clinton, Gore, Kerry voter here) though, they've completely lost their marbles. I won't support amnesty and open borders, green new insanity, Obamacare (used it, it sucks), outsourcing, NAFTA... I won't support a party that gives billions to Iran, that hates the US and Israel and sympathize with Hamas I wont support a party that hates Christianity and cancels Christmas, yet bends over backward to accommodate Islam I won't support a party that embraces Antifa's violence, BLM's racism, Lois Farrakhan's and Ilhan Omar's antisemitism ... Anyway, I diverged. Sorry buddy but Biden never condemned Antifa, your inability to come up with a link or his quote condemning it is quite telling lest we forget that Kamala's staff donated a ton of money to bail the violent thugs out of jails.
There is no such thing as a "fascist anarchist." It's akin to saying there's a communist capitalist. It's completely absurd. He may not have condemned people you've been propagandized to blame for the violence, but he did condemn those actually involved. What he hasn't done is address the economics pushed by BLM. Too bad because that's the real threat. Your cite is behind a pay wall. $45/month to read propaganda? No. Antifa had some support among liberals until they shifted to street violence. At that point, their support all but vanished.
I didn't support Clinton, Gore, or Kerry, either. Your difficulty is you don't know what you do support. Democrats don't hate this country. That's absurd. You're off in the weeds. Most Democrats are Christians. They certainly haven't canceled Christmas or bent over to appease Islamists. They don't support Antifa or Omar's antisemitism. BLM is not racist although some supporters are themselves racist. Ditto some BLM organizers. Get a clue. I heard Biden condemn Antifa by name. Why would you think I should waste my time digging up a clip of him doing it? https://ca.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN2712ZA
I do condemn....violence no matter who it is muttered on a local Pennsylvania news channel with the audience of literally 3 Pennsylvania towns IS NOT a good enough condemnation by a Presidential candidate. If anything it shows the opposite, he refuses to condemn them and just dances around the issue. It's like if Trump told you he condemned white supremacy in a conversation with Melania, would that be acceptable? LOL Jeez, dude, stop embarrassing yourself, he must condemn Antifa, explicitly, by mentioning their name, to a national audience. Anything less than that is the message of his support for their action and it's not fooling anyone. We were not born yesterday.
I saw a clip on CNN where Joe condemned Antifa for using violence. Maybe I could find it on YouTube. But I know what I saw, so that's good enough for me. I saw him do on CNN. He already did what you're demanding he do. Well, that's your spin. Voters seem satisfied and Trump is running out of road. Right now, it looks as though voters have had enough of President Turmoil.
