I can't do that because I have not read this entire discussion However, I am willing to hear what you to have to say in order to make that opinion. Please provide any of your post #s that you'd like me to consider.
OK, I interpreted it as a statement about me, as it was addressed to me. But, I'm now thinking you were identifying a general question that gets asked and then commenting on that question. I'm certainly fine with that!
My apologies to you on that. No, it was not about you, personally. I was using "you" (collectively) to represent the people that align with the viewpoint expressed in my posts. I'm sorry for any inconvenience to you.
FoxHastings said: ↑ OK, so bodily autonomy doesn't exist...so if a richer more powerful person needs a new heart or a blood transfusion they will just take yours...right? OK with you? Afterall , if the right to bodily autonomy doesn't exist you can't protest We are talking about the right of bodily autonomy and how YOU want it but don't want women to have it...hence you canNOT address my post If one has a born child and say it needed a blood transfusion or a kidney the parent canNOT be forced to give them their blood or kidney.
Because they believe their personal opinion should be forced on others by the government. The same way the left claims to support a womans right to bodily autonomy, unless she wants to protect that right with a gun. Its all about power and control under the guise of concern for human life.
I suppose one solution to this problem is to make men responsible for their offspring. Make everyone have a DNA test which is kept on file, and then every birth can be traced to the father, who has to pay upkeep for the sprog. How much does a child cost from zero to 18? Quite a lot... Maybe some of those passing these laws would find themselves out of pocket. Wouldn't that be funny?