FoxHastings said: ↑ Why can't you answer my question: Is it the rape victims fault? What do you mean by "it's the only time"? It mat be "murder in your eyes but happily you don't make the laws.
Claiming that a human in utero is not really human, is also a belief. It's an ideological position predicated on the desire to protect adults - which is its own kind of ignorance. No different to the religious belief that all human life is sacred from the instant of its conception.
You realise of course, that banning medical abortion altogether would simply be allowing nature to prevail, right? Are you saying nature is misogynistic?
OMG you poor guy. So it was legal in 3 of 50 states until some justices yanked out of their arses to make it 50 states.
No Robert. It was legal in 19 states with some restrictions. And it was legal in ALL states under the Founding Fathers.
FoxHastings said: ↑ No, Pro-Choice is not aginast women saving their own lives...that would be Anti-Choicers...they don't value women's lives....just fetuse's... Yes, they left limitations to the states....and no, women's rights were not sacrificed since they can have abortions right up to the end of gestation...I know Anti-Choicers don't like that (women's lives being saved) but it's true LOL, all my posts and now you claim I'm dodging the issue...seems like the only one dodging is the one with nothing to say ...except for falling back on the ""Anti-Choicers have no argument so make up things like the other poster is angry" ..except for falling back on the ""Anti-Choicers have no argument so make up things like the other poster is angry" I have answered his question and in a LOT SHORTER time than it took you to answer mine... Oh, another Edict from The Grand Ruler ??? LOL... I didn't expect logic from and Anti-Choicer and didn't get it ...as usual. I support a woman's right to choose abortion whenever needed.
FoxHastings said: ↑ NO, they don't necessarily AGREE...they do offer a compromise to the misogynistic people who want abortion banned altogether.. LOL, you are grasping now....
Have you always held these views on abortion rights or has your paradigm shifted as you've grown older?
Your response seems to a whole lotta gibberish, with no attempt to answer my question, "Except for you, everyone no matter what side of the issue, thinks at some point abortion should be regulated. The difference is only where to draw the line. Do you agree or disagree with that?" Instead you seem to have gotten angry. Cool off
You've mentioned the "5000 Taliban" over a 100 times in the past two weeks, but have failed to explain what they had to do with Biden's disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan. Not that it has anything to do with this topic but since you post about "5000 Taliban" in just about every thread you're in, I figured at some point you should probably explain what they have to do with any topic you post about then in.
It's all a line in the sand. And the law is the final arbiter. Which is subject to the whims of society.
Well .. "Philosophy is the foundation of science ... and while science can tell you if the entity has a brain - or lacks one - it can not tell you whether or not having a brain constitutes a person.
FoxHastings said: ↑ Or if she was raped...????? WTF!!! I never said anything about where she could or couldn't get an abortion.... If you can't follow the discussion maybe replying isn't such a good idea... I asked a QUESTION denoted by this "?" ( QUESTION MARK) : Matthewthf said: ↑ I'm completely against it unless the mother's life is at risk of death."""" FoxHastings: Or if she was raped...?????
many of them were Taliban leaders and fighters, they helped make this happen, not sure how you can not see that Trump legitimized the Taliban in the eyes of the Afgan people via his actions with the Taliban
It's true misogyny when a person blames a woman for being raped and wants her punished for the rest of her life ... a life sentence that rapist's seldom get...true misogyny
