Seriously, a scientific model is made based upon facts is not erroneous. Course in math modeling would help anyone get it. Once a factual based model is made, it presents an easier to see visualized evidence then just a bunch of numbers.. non math related babble helps no one.
And the point is what ? That some species do better because their natural enemies are exterminated. I suppose then Lyme disease from deer ticks that are a species whose habitat has increased will be used next as a rebuff to CC……when it actual increases the pressure on mankind.
Lol More ice = warmer? = climate "science" Tell us, oh genius parrot of leftwing lies, when earth gets warmer, are there more fires in nature or less... Lol...
A model gets tested. Your "models" from the past all failed.., A theory that claims "warming" in the atmosphere should not have to fudge the data to show warming that never existed....
Climate change is the norm. It is to be expected. If the past is our guide, we should expect the earth to continue to warm, to completely melt the polar ice caps, to flood the coastal areas, followed by a precipitous drop into the next ice age that scrapes Canada off the surface of the earth. No one disputes climate change.
I happen to know these basic things about fresh water freezing more readily then salt and warmer air holding more moisture. Do you ? Can you answer that ? Yup, temps are going up and there’s more ice. It’s only not logical if you don’t know why. . Why don’t you, explain please ? I’m not ending with a silly…LOL
Imo, that’s an incorrect comment. Again, that shows a false reading what cc is about. It’s about how fast the climate is changing. That’s the same line drop out Tucker and other bogus non informed troglodytes from fix news keep repeating.
Deniers of cc start with the premise that they are right and all govt,, corporate institutions and science is wrong. Once you get over that hump, the wizard of Oz looks believable.
Search for Nbc 2005 evaporates satellites balloons No warming in the atmosphere according to the two and only two measures of atmospheric temps, which were then both fudged with uncorrellated "corrections" to show "warming" that never was....
More ice and warmer = the brilliance of the global warming parrot More ice validates the truth of no ocean rise.... And no net ice melt. Your side had been lying about both all along....
Obviously by avoiding the two questions I posed, I’m hearing just babble. Seriously. How does one politely say your remarks are fact-less.
Of course, you could just go to a real science web site instead of fix news. But pigeon logic from fix news prevails.
Ok genius, if there is more ice, are the oceans rising? If the oceans are not rising (which they aren't), does that not expose yet another big lie from your side?
Since I made no assertions regarding how fast the climate is changing, youll need to point out what you think is false
No, we -- i.e., you -- just shouldn't make $#!+ up and falsely claim either unanimity or consensus on much stronger claims than there is actually consensus on.
Wrong. It’s the loss of traditional species that have accelerated while according to your own source… IUCN Read it. Alien species taking over making traditional species list…31 the lies of traditional species has accelerated. “The impacts from invasive alien species (IAS) can be compounded by climate change – the change in the Earth’s climate due to rising greenhouse gas emissions. Extreme climatic events resulting from climate change, such as hurricanes, floods and droughts can transport IAS to new areas and decrease the resistance of habitats to invasions.” https://www.iucn.org/resources/issues-briefs/species-and-climate-change
The THE TOPIC IS THE CLIMATE. You just used a reference that says the extinction of regular species is Due TO CLIMATE CHANGE. Read the thread. Alien species are the problem with climate change. So much for deniers using references that defeat their entire premise. You just got snookered .
It is clear that climate change, such as it may be, does not accelerate extinctions. That is what the data say. No further deflections will be deemed to merit a reply.
It accelerates loss of the species that are common to man while rates of alien spices increase. I specifically posted these common species. All species not being able to adjust are replaceable by alien species. The alien species put pressure on US. YET you just used a source you trust that supports man made climate change. Obviously, this is all pro man made climate change.