Then why haven't Humpty's**** Lawyers not taken that point. (Don't tell me they, unless you have a link to back it up.)
See the bits in red? All he needs is an intent, not the actual commission of an offence, or a conviction for one.
You seem to be ignoring the fact that this was a cooked up scheme to disguise the reality. All done to disguise the truth from the American...
Which goes to the issue of credit, yes?
How is any bias he has about Blanche relevant to the issues, or his direct?
Was he asked in direct what names he had called Blanche, for example?
Do you call an elephant a giraffe? If so, why? No idea.
I don't disbelieve her, do you?
Explain why 'legal fees' were grossed up.
That's what she testified to, as you well know.
The your citation is in accurate. For example the cross of Cohen.
Separate names with a comma.
