Notice how he is pushing a blatant falsehood since the data for the chart was drawn from the EIA, notice how he doesn't try to show that it...
You are getting desperate now as the evidence piles up that you try hard to ignore, the data Jack posted is from the government which you can't...
Your fact free rant amuses me. I knew all along that your source was from EIA but they don't cover the same area which is why you are missing...
The chart is from the EIA, it says so right on the chart can't you read?
I don't think he realizes your charts data is from the government........ the EIA
No, it was shown in the news many times which YOU deliberately ignore because in your view there are no downsides existing an irrational position...
I have no idea about the first post claims, but you indicated you knew it wasn't valid, but you can't make that case convincingly when I pressed...
What are you upset about? WUWT QUOTED the article that stated it was floating BEHIND the dam in the backwater area, but the world biggest solar...
Aaaand what? You called it misinformation but when I press you on it you suddenly beat around the bushes, it is clear you can't answer it. LOL
Your post is phony you deflected away from what Polydectes stated, You never addressed it........
HAW HAW HAW, then you have nothing. Cheers.
Yup it is plate capacity but never actually attained.
Your decline is continuing since I don't celebrate human misery.
Now this predicable event happened because Solar advocates are in on the scam: The World’s Largest Floating Solar Farm Wrecked by a Storm Just...
Yeah he ignores that inconvenient fact because he is so invested in the renewable's propaganda.
Separate names with a comma.
