‘Conspiracy theorists’ sane, government dupes crazy and hostile

No it's not 'physically impossible,and they DON'T have to 'gain momentum',inertia does the damage,no matter HOW much the floors 'push back'

 

spurious logic,it might fly if every floor was independent from the other,but then that wasn't the case,was it?

 

No, you're just seeing the fires spread. There is no evidence of thermite anywhere. Jones/Harriet study has been refuted. Ask yourself why they don't perform their tests again.

The fires spead as they would, considering the open space being fed air due to the loss of the windows.

 

sure there is, what do you think this is melted butter

 

Oh, and you know exactly what it is?...Tell us and then support that position with any credible evidence. I bet you can't.

 

yeh you can tell by the color temperature

well on second thought YOU obviously cant tell by the color temperature

 

Really?...then what is it?....mmmmmmmmmmm....could it be aluminum?...what color does that burn and melt? Could it be any type of material found in an office?

No, it's thermite, right....burning at the edge of the building?....gotcha.

 

first problem he has is that floors do not globally symmetrically within milliseconds fail without explosives.

doesnt take much to simply hoild the building up

 

There was an explosion....when the plane crashed into the building. None other needed.

 

what explosion

 

Really???...sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo the fuel tanks of the plane exploding don't count as an explosion? Go ahead, make that case.

 

Jojo doesn't believe planes hit the WTC.

 

>>>flamebait removed<<< how do you explain the perfect crash impring of the jetliners on the side of the WTC?

 

fuel from fuel tanks deflagrate in air not explode.

if there was an explosion it was from something else, are you saying there was an explosion?

 

Not sure what point you're trying to make. But yes, heat flows upwards (when unimpeded), and jet fuel flows downward until it is finished burning. The videos demonstrate the results of both effects.

Nothing you wrote in that sentence betrays the slightest understanding of either structural materials, engineering or the laws of physics. Catastrophic failure commences from a standstill, requiring neither time, nor distance, nor momentum at all. Once failure had commenced, a building of that size can collapse in one direction only... straight down. And if the mass from those 17 floors is capable of crushing a single floor, then it has the capacity to crush every additional floor since the momentum increases all the way down (there's this thing called gravity you might have heard of), and the mass of every subsequent crushed floor is added to the original 17. All the way down.

Go back to your pathetic cardboard boxes. Throw in a couple of Barbie Dolls while you're at it.

You wouldn't recognize a physical impossibility if it bit you on the face. You are incompetent to even have much of an opinion on the issue.

Making you the first person on the planet with the magic ability to be able to tell a distant thermite ignition from any other flash of light. Your earlier comments were just incompetent. That one is an actual hallucination.

 

Why are you trying to participate in a conversation about physics if you don't understand the laws of physics?

A plane strikes horizontally, and buildings collapse vertically. A local explosion at the top does not destroy the foundations 93 floors below.

 

Nobody competent in the relevant subjects would ever say such a dumb thing.

Freshman physics fail. All that's needed for the floors to gain momentum is another one of Newton's signature discoveries:

Gravity.

Sophomore physics fail. As long as the force from above exceeds the force pushing back, acceleration in a downward direction is the only possibility.

You guys are walking talking advertisements for the Dunning-Kruger Effect.

 

Nothing you have written in any post I have so far read has been anything other than a deliberate falsehood. When your lies are exposed as lies you either change them or simply continue to deny everything. You are the singular most untruthful person I have yet spoken to on these threads, and you have just responded to a very clear and specific explanation as to why the official story is impossible, with a nonsensical ad hominem which runs away sprinting from the explanation I gave.

 

What the hell are you talking about? Unless you are talking about electrical resistance (well, not even then actually) resistance is absolutely not cumulative. In fact... "resistance" is not even a term actually used by physicists to describe anything like this. Resistance is a force just like any other. And two floors do not create any more force than one. Two floors cannot hold up more weight than one. They have a specific designed load which they are able to bear. Anything below that load and they keep intact. Anything greater than that load and they crush. Adding additional floors does not magically change either the load or the design.

Tell me the truth. You're a jeweler, aren't you. Or a baker.

You are certainly not an engineer.

And yet, any real physicist would know that this is essentially what happened.

You really hafta stop just making stuff up. You are out of your depth.

 

Obviously you have no understanding of Newton's first law. When a building, or any other object is in mechanical equilibrium (standing up), it means that all the forces acting upon it are balanced. That object cannot then leave that state without the addition of a new force or the cessation of an old one.

 

Fail. Different burning substances have different color signatures at different temperatures. Since you have no idea what that substance is, the color signature tells you exactly nothing.

Something true for anybody who actually knows what they are talking about.

 

Another demonstrable lie, proven by the existence of Professor Steven Jones, and thousands of others who have signed a public petition stating that it is physically impossible. Do you have anything else other than straight lies, because this is getting really boring?

 

‘Conspiracy theorists’ sane, government dupes crazy and hostile

funny, most of the conspiracy theorists I have encountered on the internet and in real life tend to be malcontent, paranoid, irrational, and highly emotionally troubled.

 

What does that even mean? "Globally symmetrically?" None of the 3 WTC buildings that collapsed that day failed either globally or symmetrically.

 

Wouldn't you be, if you knew people like you are walking around with no idea about physical laws discovered over 400 years ago?