No, he isn’t, he’s his pilot, and you can not deliver any instances where Holder actually acted as Obama’s personal attorney, can’t say the same for Trump
As I said to your colleague, you can offer any proof where Holder actually serves as Obama’s personal attorney, but you can for barr regarding Trump
Everytime anyone points out the facts on Barr’s questionable relationship with Trump we get the Holder the quote, as I told your colleagues, you can not produce examples where Holder ever served as Obama’s personal attorney, but with Barr, it is easy
Your link says (once clicking on the petition) "LinkedIn profile or other online bio to confirm former DOJ employment (please enter "none" if you are unable to provide a link)". Provided the link below for everyone to see. https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1GW...f36Q/viewform?ts=5eb5b025&edit_requested=true Anyone can sign this LOL 10 bucks says you did too.
Sixth time, same lame quote, again, as I told your colleagues, you can not point to a time where Holder actually acted as Obama’s personal attorney, can’t say the same for Barr
Barr has not done that. If justice favors President Trump..... so be it. I think your narrative would put Barr in the steady position of "Prosecutor of the President".
Not true, Barr inserted the Justice Dept in the NY case at the last minute, keep in mind the case is over tax records prior to Trump becoming President, in other words, Barr was going to bat for Trump after Trump’s personal attorneys failed
sorry i met to say he was not involved in that case at all he was involved with when congress tried to subpena the White House counsel
Did Jordan ask Barr a question then interupt him from answering or accuse Barr of anything then refuse to let him respond?
NY never subpoena the White House counsel in the case, and Barr at the last moment injecting himself to move the case out of State Judicial system (https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/02/jus...deral-court-to-rule-on-trump-tax-returns.html)
Of course not, little jimmy jordan only does that to those questioning Trump or his surrogates, what little jimmy jordan did last week was take the time to regurgitate irrelevant lame Trump talking points
That was the entire purpose of the hearing, apparently, to pontificate talking points. Seems fair that Jordan would get a turn. Can you link an example of Jordan refusing to let respond someone he has addressed in a congressional hearing?
the article literally says the DOJ didn't take any position on the subpena....but wanted a federal court to hear it because of the Constitutional issues involved.