1,200 gun stores closed by Democrats!!

What a puke he has turned out to be. He has absolutely no regard for the Constitution. He is as much a traitor as is trump.

 

You can never prove a negative. You can only prove their was fraud, not that there was no fraud.

And that is true for any method of voting in any election.

They key is that they couldn't find any evidence. And mathematical models do indeed allow us to show there was likely fraud. It isn't proof but they can detect irregularities.

 

No. The key is that whether you find fraudulent voting or not, there is still the possibility it exists.

And your mathematical model does not necessarily identify likely fraud. As I mentioned before, it is like leaving the door to the bank open with no surveillance or security with uncounted cash on the counter and then claiming there was no evidence of robbery.

 

if we can find no evidence of voter fraud, we can disregard the idea as a virtual hoax

 

I have no idea what a virtual hoax is, but not finding evidence of voter fraud does not mean it does not exist.

 

i have not found evidence that Bigfoot exists, but that doesn't mean he aint real!!!!!

 

I have not found evidence that the Loch Ness monster is real, but that doesn't mean he isn't real!!!!

 

Does that mean you do not believe voter fraud exists?

 

i have never seen evidence of voter fraud that we should worry about.

 

That is not what I asked. Do you believe voter fraud exists?

 

someone claiming to be someone else and voting in their place?

i guess its possible.

but ive never seen an example

 

Again. Do you believe voter fraud exists?

 

yes, but ive seen no evidence that people have been stealing mail ballots and using them to commit voter fraud

 

Not finding evidence of voter fraud certainly means if there is any at all it is insignificant.

 

I thought any voter fraud was significant.

 

Why would you think that?

 

Why would you not think that?

 

We accept a certain amount of other illegal activity so why is the insignificant amount of alleged voter fraud so important to you?
Don’t we accept, as a nation with a 2nd amendment, that there will be gun related deaths? That it’s the price we pay for having the freedom to own guns? Why is it we’re ok with that but we’re not ok with accepting that there will be some illegal voting?
And for the record, I’m a gun owner and don’t want more gun laws. I accept that there is no prefect system of perfect world. That no matter what we do, nothing is ever perfect.

 

Because any amount has the potential of overturning an election, especially local elections.

I did not realize we accepted a certain amount of illegal activity. A certain amount of gun deaths due to illegal activity is not accepted. Sometimes accidents happen, which is not illegal and deaths happen. Even then, man slaughter charges are possible, if there is some kind of negligence.

 

United States has 4 % of the world's population, but we own 40% of the guns in civilian hands. If we don't have many guns how are we going to be able to force Democratic governors to open the churches?

 

Just do like the techy Democrats did in the last election and "TEXT: Hillary for the MFW" and send in to the vaporsphere

 

I don't think I have ever used the term Trumpsters. And hadn't actually realized it was denigrating. I do admit that I prefer Orange Idiot, to Orange Man, though. I understand that there are some policies that, in your mind, erases everything else he does. But that doesn't remove the fact that he's an idiot. You can support his policies. I understand that. But there is no excuse for his dishonesty and incompetence. So you can support some of his policies. But that doesn't imply you should deny realilty.

You would think so, wouldn't you? Didn't work for me any of the times that I've been banned, though. But you can try it yourself. If it doesn't work, at least you will have contributed something to the forum.

 

The same could be true if it had been gun stores. And the right would certainly be, no pun intended, "up in arms". But the thread wouldn't have attracted this many gun advocates if the title said "polling places"

 

Now... that's interesting. You consider me saying that Trump supporters don't care about protecting the Constitution an "insult". And yet, you stay silent about a President who has abused his constitutional powers,.... And who is even now threatening to abuse his constitutional powers by overriding the orders of governors.

I smell a possible scent of hypocrisy under a distinct stench at inconsistency.

 

Just being a member here and throwing light on the liberal BS is contribution enough.