1/6 committee to 'swiftly consider' criminal contempt for Steve Bannon, others who ignore subpoenas

How many times has Rolling Stone had egg on it's face during the Trump years?

And where does it state they were planning an insurrection or overthrow of the government? They are offering hearsay about the perfectly legal rally that occurred.

 

You need to chill a little. You take things way too seriously.

 

Cynicism? I believe what I say and say what I believe. If you think politicians are honorable then you get my naivete award for the week. Politics itself is dishonorable.

 

I learned this from a poster called XCobraJock who wrote a very good book that I had a minor role in his book.
Politics = Many Blood Sucking insects

Things he said

Jun 07, 1999
By Stephen Downes
Posted to XCobra's List, 07 June 1999
I applaud the proposal to start at the beginning. It is clear that I do not share some basic assumptions with this group. This becomes clear when we look at the foundations.

XCobraJock@aol.com wrote: All theories of politics must start with a postulate, an agreed-upon assumption that serves as a foundation for the whole of the theory. I propose to start with this basic assumption: Life (survival) is good; death (extinction) is bad.

 

I have long noticed actual riots.
Antifa rioting when speakers show up at university campuses
BLM riots at Portland at a Federal Court house
Riots in Minnesota causing the Democrats to demand to outlaw cops serving.
Those they call protests.
Citizens visiting the Capitol get called rioters. Amazing fiction by the democrats.

 

You would be a pain in the ass on any Jury. You took the word of the press who were after Trump from a minimum of January 6, 2017 until right now.
It is a damned shame so many suffer the Trump phobia.

 

Congress can ask. But the boss is the Judge. Bannon knows that.

When Congress charged AG Eric Holder with contempt of Congress, the Judge turned Congress down. The boss said hell no.

 

If you read the article it talks about planning for the perfectly legal rally that day, NOT insurrection or an overthrow of the government and the pardons which are based on total hearsay are about OTHER previous crimes and no evidence is produced to support the claims and no pardons were ever issued.

"Both sources say he dangled the possibility of a “blanket pardon” in an unrelated ongoing investigation to encourage them to plan the protests."

 

Unnamed sources.

 

No, they'd be offering perfectly legal TESTIMONY, since they were reportedly personally involved.... another legal term you misuse...

Getting to be a very disappointing habit...

 

And nothing more than there was going to be a big LAWFUL rally in DC and we talked about it with lots of people.

 

And where does it state they were planning an insurrection or overthrow of the government? They are offering hearsay, they are saying this Congressman told them something someone else said, about pardons which never happened and discussions about the perfectly legal rally that occurred.

 

You would be a pain in the ass on any jury. You believe the lies of dirty donny over the overwhelming weight of evidence that the election was free, fair, and the most secure election in in the nation’s history.

 

It's been 3 weeks. How long does it take Dems to "swiftly consider" something?

Tucker Rips 'Lying Coward' Liz Cheney After She Joins Democrat Meltdown Over His J6 Exposé


"Until yesterday, she and Nancy Pelosi had a monopoly on how Americans were allowed to understand January 6th..."

"Patriot Purge":

Fake News Is All A Twitter!