10 Reasons Why Progressives Need to Vote for Hillary

The comminist party and the green party, the United States Marijuana Party, United states Pacifist Party,

 

I disagree with number 7. Should be:

7. Lack of penis.

 

...comminists?? really
Well, I might be talking about the communist party, and it is anything but neutral. They are as far left as one can get without running into the right

 

so, you agree that he is not a serioius candidate

psst- that defines sacrificial lamb and i doubt that we'll ever be privvy to the deal which was cut with him for him to give up his Senate seat and take one for team Democrat.

 

He's probably the most serious candidate, but he's also realistic enough to know that although he has raised more money in 24 hours than Rand Paul, Marco Rubio, and Ted Cruz combined, due to Citizens United, it takes a helluva a lot of money to run and win a campaign. Sanders is reliant upon grassroots money as opposed to corporate puppet masters and dark money, which is exactly why Sanders wants to get the message out loud and clear that the USA is going down the path of an Oligarchy. No other candidate is addressing this and it does indeed need to be addressed.

 

Are you familiar with the term "urinating into the wind" ?

If Bernie is actually serious about the spew he puts forth, then he is getting a taste of what good Americans have been getting for many years since leftists have been getting their way and the media is shaping the leftist message.

It's frustrating to sit by and watch voters willingly support the trampling of the Constitution by voting Democrat.

IMO, Bernie is bought and paid for by the Democrat party and he'll be well compensated for agreeign to take one for the team.

The next person to toss in their hat will be her VP.

The lying sack of sheet Warren will get a cabinet position in the Clinton admin.

She's another one who laughs at the useful idiots who believe what comes from her mouth. The ole gal will be taken care of by Hillary

 

Define spew because I really have no idea what you are rambling about and sadly neither do you.

 

Hillary would have a better chance of winning if she didnt sellout her country for her own personal gain.

 

Democrats in 2012: "We don't want a rich elitist 1%er to run the free world! Vote Obama!"
Democrats in 2015: "We want a rich elitist 1%er to fun the free world! Vote Hillary!"

 

Liberals will vote for Hitler if he had a D infront of his name. Liberals place there ideology above everything else. To a liberal, the only thing worse then voting for someone who hates America and wants to tear it down, is voting for someone who loves America and wants to build it up. America is the devil and all that stands between freedom and a global socialist police state run by an enlightened liberals (liberal utopia)

- - - Updated - - -

Liberals don't care about selling out the country they hate. They want America destroyed and rebuilt into the USSR-2.0

 

You mean as opposed to the Oligarchy that GOP policies are proliferating? Explain how corporations buying elections and dictating policies that enrich them and their puppets in government and decimates the middle class is what helps Americans. Really...explain.

 

I assume you include Obama and all the corporate money he got.

 

The Obama is clean and pure like the wind drivin snow. You are racist for suggesting otherwise.

 

There is a struggle in the GOP between the conservatives and the corporatist. Unlike the drones on the left would will blindly follow anyone the oligarchy tells them too, we are different. I won't support a corporatist candidate. I didn't support Romnie or McLame and if another RINO gets the nod, they can count on me and others like me staying home. It does suck to watch the dems burn the country down in the mean time.

LOL, like the Clinton Foundation. You people are a joke. The Obama and anyone with a D infront of there name is good. Anyone with an R is baddddd.

Wake up please. What is happening to the middle class? It's almost be completely wiped out. After Hilary doubles down on Obama's global socialist (Gazi) policys the middle class will be gone. Everyone will make 15 bucks an hour if you're lucky enough to find a job and we'll just have 2 classes. The elite, and the rest. The elite will rule from ivory towers, while the rest will equally share life's miseries.

 

Any progressive need only look at the alternative to find Hillary increasingly attractive.

 

Why would they vote for someone who loves the country they hate? They don't want America to succeed, they want to tear down and remake into the USSR-2.0

 

Well yeah, if you want another neoliberal in the oval office, you could vote for Hillary or any of the republicans running.

Hillary isn't liberal nor progressive. She is owned by wall street and corporations, just as Obama is, or any republican running.

Sanders is the only genuine liberal or progressive running. And of course the liberals and progressives are too disconnected from reality to vote for him. So they will vote against their own self interests, and vote for Hillary. Because basically the left are simple idiots. Afterall, they voted for Obama which on the important issues, is owned by wall street and corporations.

Real liberalism is dead, as Chris Hedges notes in his book about it. And the liberals not voting for Sanders will prove it.

 

I remember when liberals used to say things like "I don't agree with what you say, but I'll fight for your right to say it". Now they say "What you are saying has been deemed hate speech by our enlighted speech czar. You will now be charged with a hate crime. Off to the camps with you. Labor is freedom"

 

That's a bizarre fantasy you have going there.

 

The democratic party is not liberal, nor progressive. Liberalism died. These so called progressives you speak of are enablers of the corporate run state.

 

The bizarre fantasy is believing someone like Hilary Clinton has the good of the American people in mind when she's obviously selling Americans and our interest to the highest bidder. As a Gazi (global socialist) I'm sure the ends justify the means.

 

One reason NOT to vote for Hillary:

Bernie Sanders!!

 

From your link:
"In 2008, progressives had the choice between a 'moderately-progressive' Barack Obama and a moderately conservative Hillary Clinton. Obviously, we made the right decision—but what about now? I’m auguring that Hillary is our best and only chance to win in 2016..."
In 2008 authentic progressives like Noam Chomsky, Chris Hedges, and Robert Scheer saw Obama ,both Clintons, and John McCain as two sides of the same corporate coin. Those who tell you to vote for the lesser evil are solidly behind Hillary, but anyone who's paid attention to Clinton's history knows her administration will be corporate from top to bottom, just as any Republican elected in 2016 would be. At least with Republicans in the White House, all non-conservatives will be on the same side
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/04/19/1378817/-10-Reasons-Why-Progressives-Need-to-Vote-for-Hillary#

 

The progressives should vote for Hitlery for the following reasons.

They like the status quo and want the government to continue to have even more power over their lives.
They fear being responsible for their own lives and believe Hitlery will take care of them.
Because their public education has left them worthless and unemployable and need a mommy to take care of them.
Because we want free sh** and Hitlerly will give us some free sh**. Maybe she will give us some free government doobies.... yea that would be cool......

 

No, they prefer a true Progressive, but the money that buys politicians will not make it easy for a potential candidate that does not rely upon corporate donors, but rather grassroots small donors, to win. This not being responsible rhetoric propaganda is getting jaded....give it a rest...(yawn).