38 Women Accuse U.S. Jewish Director James Toback of Sexual Harassment

Of course you did. Is there a reason that threads like this are allowed? Can I start creating anti-muslim threads that focus the conversation on islam, or is only anti-jewish crap allowed here?

 

Lots of well-known media outlets have discussed the jewish aspects of the Harvey Swinestein scandal. Fox News, Tablet Magazine, Huffington Post and The Algemeiner are just a couple of examples.

Of course you can. You have already started threads in which you call Arabs/Muslims "filth", "vermin", "dishonest", etc. (I have never called jews these things here on PF, yet I'm supposedly the "hater". Funny how it works, huh?)

 

This sick dude is like Bill Cosby with a yamaka.

 

“In countries where Jews are free to invent and create, they pile up conspicuous wealth and arouse envy and suspicion. In this age of information, when the achievements of mind have widely outpaced the power of masses and material force, Jews have forged much of the science and wealth of the era. Their pioneering contributions to quantum theory enabled the digital age. Their breakthroughs in nuclear science and computer science propelled the West to victory in World War II and the cold war. Their bioengineering inventions have enhanced the health, and their microchip designs are fueling the growth, of nations everywhere. Their genius has lifted the culture and economy of the world.”

Excerpt From The Israel Test George Gilder

Every people have their schlemiels. On the other hand, you should be grateful to Jews for all the good they do for the world. <<MOD EDIT - RULE 3 - Removed Flamebait>>

 

So what?

 

No, no, no, no!! See, Jesus is all-loving and all-powerful, so if his #1 guys on earth (the Xtian clergy) were doing that consistently then Jesus, because he's so loving, would have come down and told Catholics that they need to get there ship in order on this matter. So because Jesus is on the case there is certainly NO ABUSE OF CHILDREN IN THE CATHOLIC Church.....I have faith in Jesus and his high level of compassion.

I myself would of course do that, and seeing how Jesus is more compassionate than I am, I'm pretty sure that Jesus would to (if it was a problem.)

 

It finally happened. Once in a great while, someone makes their case against mine so well that I cannot help but to see the wisdom in their view and admit that I was PARTIALLY wrong. But this is the first time in my life that anyone has ever motivated their argument so well, and with such strong and superior moral evidence that I have to acknowledge that I was COMPLETELY wrong.

 

.
The guys at the jewish news site JTA are troubled by the fact that most of the celebrities who are accused of sexual harassment are jews:

https://www.jta.org/2017/11/21/life...l-franken-are-jewish-but-are-they-jewish-news

 

And a good thing that they are - imagine that - most of the celebrities are Jews!

 

.
Butt Midler says that the jewish celebrity Geraldo Rivera drugged and groped her:

https://www.jta.org/2017/11/30/news...ys-that-geraldo-rivera-drugged-and-groped-her

Interesting that the jew Rivera defended his fellow jew Lauer. Interesting, but hardly surprising.

 

I think all these scandals about women sexually abused could backfire. The "Pence rule" (not to meet with a female colleague without a witness) increasingly seems a sensible approach. Thus, if the decision to hire a well-qualified female applicant requires her meeting with a male decision-maker and this requires a (preferably female) witness, her candidacy may not be considered as it is much easier to arrange a one-on-one meeting with a male applicant (unless the decision-maker is gay -or female).

Moreover, in the fairly integrated professional environment male professionals will become increasingly reluctant to meet with female colleagues to informally discuss business matters, they'll need to schedule witnesses, women will be denied the oversight and mentoring more readily available to their male colleagues.

 

You may be half-joking but I honestly believe we are heading in that direction. This feminism crapola is starting to resemble a scab that they can't help picking.

 

https://www.jta.org/2017/11/30/news...ovitz-accused-of-rape-other-sexual-misconduct

Man, it never ends...

 

Here are some of the well-known media outlets that have highlighted the jewish aspect of the Harvey Swinestein scandal: Fox News, Tablet Magazine, Huffington Post and Jewish Telegraphic Agency. But when I mention it here on PF, I'm branded an "antisemite". Funny how it works, huh?

 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/af...ra-suspends-Levine-sex-abuse-allegations.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Levine

 

I'm not "half-joking" at all, I think one would sensibly be concerned meeting with any woman behind closed doors, even in a professional setting, is risky; if you don't agree with whatever she wants, she could accuse you of whatever she wants, and if she just accuses you, you'll be fired.

 

Another alleged sex abuser from the media; Dylan Howard:

And another political sex abuser; Ruben Kihuen (D-Nev.)

Of course Pelosi and Lujan say they didn’t know anything about Kihuen’s alleged malfeasance.

 

It is unfortunate, but I have had a personal experience that demonstrates this very attitude. I pushed a woman away who was bullying me. Her hand was near her mouth at that moment and so her lip was cut by either her fingernail or her teeth. She told the police that I gave her a karate chop across her face (causing the cut lip and a non-existent bruise on her cheek on the opposite side of her face. This was absolutely impossible anyway, as she is much taller than I and I would have to be six foot tall to do it and that still wouldn't explain a bruise to her opposite cheek without also bruising her nose which is between her cut lower right lip and her "bruised" upper left cheek. As her "witness" her mother flew in from France to TESTIFY that I administered the karate chop because (and get this!) that is what her daughter told her over the telephone! The courts actually accepted her as a "witness" and charged me GUILTY. In hindsight I was lucky. She could have claimed that I had also raped her and I am sure the courts would have believed that too. As it was I had to pay a fine and had to do 40 hours of community work. I am 70 years old and retired so doing the community work was easy. In my whole life, I have never been in trouble with the police - not even once. But I get shivers when I think that had she claimed that I had raped her I would have got thrown into prison!

So yes, you are absolutely right ..........

 

I'm more concerned with the innocuous business setting where people compete to advance in a professional environment. In this setting women have often complained of discrimination and that "glass ceiling", they want to get ahead, but are frustrated as they find male competitors favored. Suddenly it appears men are getting fired because women are saying they've been sexually harassed. If you were a woman looking for a promotion, wouldn't it make sense for you to claim the guy in the position you seek sexually assaulted you?

The "Pence Rule" (never meet with a woman behind closed doors without a witness) seems extreme, if such a practice became prevalent it is obvious women would advance professionally at a much slower pace, that "glass ceiling" would be much lower because while any guy can be recognized for his good work, for a woman to earn whatever promotion she would need not just the recognition of her excellent work, but also a witness to that recognition. Something similar would arise in hiring, when Human Resources has identified candidates of both genders, they've reviewed the resumes, checked references and need to interview applicants, the women will be more difficult to schedule since an interviewer could reasonably demand a witness -so HR might just invite male applicants (saves time and trouble).

A professional environment, for example a law firm or accounting office, architect studio, will have qualified professionals working together, they are supposed to share information on developments in their discipline, input from clients, experiences with different procedures, but men will need to be extra careful when interacting with a female colleague, certainly not coach her privately, while they've no obstacle in doing so with a male counterpart.

This could degenerate to a phobia of women where one would have to step out of an elevator rather than be left alone in it with a woman.

 

A bit over-dramatic. But let us say that it does play out that way. You do see the feminist's simple solution, don't you?

..... time's up! What is your answer?

 

Feminists would want all men removed from the work environment, have them take care of the kids and wash the dishes instead.

 

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-42271979

 

https://www.jta.org/2017/12/08/news...esignation-pains-his-jewish-fans-in-minnesota

Oy gevalt.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/film/2017/dec/08/dustin-hoffman-sexual-harassment-broadway