400 cases of female genital mutilation recorded in the UK every month

Yes, and more often than not it's done with a blunt razor blade, and for no material purpose? The atrocity to boys and girl babies has nothing to do with the ability to 'achieve orgasm' or not in twenty years time!

 

We are talking about the diffrence between male and female circumcision, are you feeling alright ?

 

OFC it matters ! it makes all the diffrence what you do to the baby to decide if its an "atrocity" or not, there is no point in Female circumcision other than opress the woman for life - Male circumcision has NO affects what so ever on the child, other than making his penis good looking that is...

One is a handicap for life in order to opress the woman and the other is nothing more than a fire mark or skin piercing - your focus that both are done to babies is extremly shallow.

 

(*)(*)(*)(*) it, cut all your woman vegina's in the UK what do I care, note that Egypt is more advanced than you in this regard, they are not the sharpest pencils in the ME but at least they dont excuse cutting a clitoris because males cut their foreskins.

 

So circumcision on a male is to make a penis look good!
I am astounded that you wrote that and then you go on to use the word "shallow".

- - - Updated - - -

Both are barbaric, child abuse and torture on a baby that has no choice and who is "we" in your sentence?

 

I think it does but that'ts my personal opinon, its not a handicap that's for sure.

- - - Updated - - -

Murder and traffic offense are both illegal but no one sane thinks to unite them under same headline, to hide woman opression behind male circumcision is barbaric, child abuse and torture of females in the UK because male circumcision may be argubly usless but are also harmless in oppose to the cutting of a clitoris off !

"we" who wrote about the diffrence, scroll the last 30 posts and see.

EDIT: you are not seriously still checking if there are several ppl posting in my name are you ?

 

So because you think that it looks better gives you the right to mutilate another person who has no say in the matter?

It is you who has been trying to justify the act of male circumcision as being different because one act is more barbaric than another.

ps Murder and theft are both illegal and no one thinks about uniting them under the same headline.

 

Its a harmles procedure and parents have rights over their babies, to remove an organ from your baby so she wont cheat on her husband is entirly diffrent

No because the topic is female mutilation and not male circumcision, if the topic was male circumcision and I was saying "look what the Muslims do!!" - then I would be justifying it by diversion - what you are doing now.
You are putting a harmless skin removal that has no affect of a child upbringing and a clitoris removal making a woman unable to EVER enjoy sex under same headline, show me one woman that publicly supports female circumcision, that says its as harmless as male circumcision or defends it as males defend theirs, show me and Ill agree both should be treated the same way.

 

Hmmmm??? removing the clitoris has nothing to do with the ability to 'achieve orgasm'? Do you have evidence for that assertion or did you just make it up to fit with what you already believe.

 

Forget it - you're spectacularly missing the point, viz. the atrocity of the act, and the pain of it sans anaesthetic?? I'm not so naïve as to not know the function of the clit . . . I'd have thought you would know I'm an intelligent man from my posts? Would you like to be circumcised without being anaesthetised?