670 ballots in a precinct with 276 voters, and other tales from Georgia's primary

DO you understand the difference betweent the voter, and the counter ?

Again, you keep trying to debate from a very much uninformed position.

Voter= voter fraud
Counter= election fraud

 

I linked to the definition of voter fraud.

I'm not interested in your opinion and spin on what is, and isn't, voter fraud.

 

You didn’t read the OP, and you dont even understand what you posted.

The guy counting/stuffing the vote isn’t doing so as a voter, but as a election official.....therefore it isn’t “voter fraud”, its election fraud.

I noticed you didn’t weigh in the the Kobach issue.

 

Once again, your OPINION on what constitutes voter fraud runs afoul of the definition of voter fraud.

Keep digging...............

 

What's more.............you assume the additional votes were because some guy was in the back room stuffing the box.

You have no evidence that is the case.

 

670 people showed up when 276 were registered. If those working at that location allowed that to happen, even THAT is election fraud.

But then again, you still haven’t read the OP. You keep making things up as you go along to fit your need.

You keep defending Trumps assertions no matter how absurd.

 

In a county that voted for Trump ...

 

Who, specifically, says "There is no voter fraud"?


Why did Trump, after repeatedly claiming that millions of undocumented immigrants voted for Hillary Clinton -- allegedly depriving him of the popular vote - allow his Kobach-led witch hunt to fizzle after finding no evidence to support his fake claim?

 

Almost no one says there is no voter fraud.

What people do say is that voter fraud makes up a statistically insignificant amount of votes and does nothing to effect election outcomes.

 

You have the example of a Minnesota senate race I just gave. It did affect that race, without voter fraud Coleman, not Franken would have gone to Washington.

 

BINGO!!!!!!

 

You posted an op-ed that claimed that they matched "known felon NAMES against voter roles". When the full investigation took place by the state, only 26 were charged. Of those 26, 25 claimed that they were told their voting rights were restored. Many of the original names were just matches to a "same name" voter, and as stated about, only 26 were actually correct. So in reality, only 1 person knowingly voted illegally.

With that said, I never claimed that voter fraud didn't exist. What I have said, and still stand by, is that voter fraud is so small it has little to no affect on state and national races.

These groups that "match names" to throw people off the voter roles are ridiculous. They are purposely suppressing the vote. Name matching is a game played by those who want to suppress voters rights.

I want to be clear. I support voter ID. But what I dont support are the methods of those who use "name matching" only as a method of "cleaning" up the voter roles.

Another investigation by a local TV station:
https://minnesota.cbslocal.com/2016/10/18/reality-check-is-the-election-rigged/

 

Because no one cooperated with the study.

It is a known FACT that over 7,000 ILLEGAL BALLOTS have been cast in Virginia , ALONE, more than enough to change LOCAL, STATE, and even CLOSE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS.

What is the "acceptable amount" of voter fraud to the Fraudocrats?

 

So then why do liberals fight tooth and nail against ID? After all, if voter fraud is so minimal, then there is no reason that people shoudn't have an ID to vote.

 

Grandma used to be a life long Republican, then she died and became a life long Democrat.

 

Which is why the Lizard Lords who run the NWO haven't been revealed.

 

And not a single sky watching astronomer has ever validated that planet Nibiru exists.

 

fyi, in the article it states colemam may have won, and even though that evidence was presented, coleman did not contest it. i remember frankin contesting the count and winning on the recount.

 

Why ?

1- Do you have any proof that those 7,000 fraudsters voted majority for the Democrats?

2- Even if there were 7,000 frauds per state, there would still be 2,650,000 missing for Trump's claim to be true.

 

Agreed! It's a conspiracy to hide the truth!!!

 

source ?

 

The Election commission never even got started because of the MSM uproar and states refusing to cooperate.

Let's look at the Kansas governors race, how many fraudulent votes would it have taken to change the results?
How about West Virginia where the election of a state legislature was a dead tie and that election determined which party would control the state legislature.

It is a total canard that the left attempts to hide behind that voter fraud is a problem ONLY if it is on a massive scale.

 

The GOP controls the majority of states and the congress and WH...........your point is to blame the media? Expound on the major leap you are making, tks.

 

How much does it take?
Look at Kansas gubintoral contest this election cycle and West Virginia state legislature, with the majority control of the state legislature in the balance, last election cycle. A city council member running in a district with 500 voters, how much does it take?

Stop with the canard that voter fraud is only a problem if it is MASSIVE.

 

Yes it was the MSM that mounted to campaign to discredit it before it even got started. And read the OP, that is EXACTLY the type of issues it was going to address.