9/11 Truth Movement's Credibility Gap

Discussion in '9/11' started by cooky, Dec 6, 2011.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    :lol: Anyone want to bet suede is going to try and pull out killtown's crap? :lol: That stuff has been laughed at from one side of the net to the other. Nothing but childish opinion and wishful thinking in a pathetic attempt on killtown's part to bring some kind of meaning to his pathetic life.

    So you are going to call hundreds of people liars. OK. On what do you base the ASSumption that everyone else is lying and you are telling the truth?
     
  2. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    If you contact them in the first place, they would. (Trying to contact them psychically won't work.)

    You can address me by my name, or not at all. Try to stick to the ToS, suede.
     
  3. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No one in their sane mind would rely on killtown's psychobabble. Unless your name was Ozzy Bin Oswald. :)
     
  4. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yeah, Killtown's crap is like the sad punchline to a really crappy joke that is in poor taste. Seems like that is where all the Flight 93 deniers end up, though.
     
  5. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    And yet Patriot911, along with every other skeptic here, can't prove most of Flight 93 buried.

    How sad. I guess ad hom attacks on people instead is much easier for them.
     
  6. cooky

    cooky New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2011
    Messages:
    439
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Do you really think a thread on an internet forum constitutes evidence?
     
  7. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You skeptics with all your internet forum threads you claim debunks our conspiracy theories seem to think so.

    Now, will you now retract your "ABSOLUTELY NO EVIDENCE" statement?

    And what do you mean exactly? Like a media report that says "Nothing was actually buried in the ground though"?
     
  8. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Has anyone debunked any? If so, link please.
     
  9. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What's to debunk? That would be like trying to debunk a fairytale: it debunks itself.
     
  10. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So none of his stuff has been debunked? Got it.
     
  11. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    One doesn't need to debunk works of fiction.
    Just warn your kids about the danger of believing crackpot bloggers.
     
  12. cooky

    cooky New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2011
    Messages:
    439
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I do not consider a thread on this forum as evidence.
     
  13. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Have any of you skeptics proved it's fiction? If so, link please.
     
  14. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It is obvious fiction. No sane person would believe was fact.
     
  15. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    OK, well what do you except as "evidence"? Obviously logic, reason, and photographic evidence is out the window.
     
  16. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So I guess that's a "no", no skeptic has shown it's fiction. Got it.
     
  17. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Tons. But you're not worth going off and doing legwork you can do for yourself.

    Bottom line is this: you've been shown the evidence. You've called everyone a liar. You've yet to post a single shred of evidence that YOUR claims are true that nothing was buried.

    So tell us again why we should entertain you?
     
  18. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Lie.

    You only say that cause you lied.

    Lie.

    Lie.

    Considering how often you lie, I think that question should be asked of you!
     
  19. Patriot911

    Patriot911 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    9,312
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    OK, so you've proven you can call others liars. Congratulations on proving exactly nothing. Anything else you want to go on and on about?
     
  20. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Rational people can see that it's fiction. No need for debunking.

    Given his record, both online and in the court reports, I'm surprised anyone would take him seriously.
     
  21. psikeyhackr

    psikeyhackr Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2009
    Messages:
    1,601
    Likes Received:
    188
    Trophy Points:
    63
    ROFLMAO

    These PROOFS are hysterical.

    First of all it says it is a NEW THEORY in the title at the top. Then if you look at the footnotes the latest are from 2002.

    Then if you search the paper for words like

    mass, tons, kg, kilograms you will notice a slight scarcity. So again you BELIEVE in PROOF without data even when they do not even claim to be proofs. :-D.

    psik
     
  22. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So you agree that Patriot911 was lying when he said there were "tons"?

    Court reports? Please explain.

    Funny coming from someone who's known for making wild and unsubstantiated claims!
     
  23. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    10,697
    Likes Received:
    3,729
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Come on, 32 pages is too much for you to read? For once read the paper. Just read it. You might actually learn something.
     
  24. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Patriot911 does not lie. Read for comprehension.

    You don't know what a court report is?

    My claims came with substantiating sources. Where are your sources?
     
  25. cooky

    cooky New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2011
    Messages:
    439
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Are you incapable of evaluating the quality of source material?
     

Share This Page