91 year old Nazi charged....

The zombies are a given.

Vampires?

 

Considering what the nazis did to Russia, I'd say it was karma that the Russians were equally as brutal. But I don't think that the russians killed 25 million germans, so by body count, the germans were worse.

Besides which, only small fry get charged with war crimes when they are on the victorious side, and rarely get convicted. Remember Lt.Calley?

 

Correct.

And that is what makes it a moral farce.

For me, if you are going to have a concept such as 'war crimes', then it MUST be consistant, otherwise is is a fraud, and little else.

 

I partly agree with the sentiment of your point and on the other hand, in order for justice reign supreme as it should, age should not come into play. If the person is actually guilty of the allegations, then there needs to be prosecution so that this type of incident is scorned as it should be. My point being that if this person IS IN FACT GUILTY and there are others of similar age in other lands and places who have committed similar acts, that they too should be tried and if found guilty that justice is served. Heck, there are plenty of people who have carte blanch murdered people and have gotten away with their deeds. Please do not start with the old cliche, "God has them in Hell" none sense because that is a none reality. If a person does not suffer the consequences of his or her heinous deeds while they are still alive, than justice is neither served nor administered.
All of the innocent people who had their lives extinguished simply because they were there needs to be atoned for. I would like to see all guilty parties of whatever deeds they have committed meet justice and then justice will be served.
For those who disagree, how old are Henry Kissinger,George Herbert Walker Bush, George Walker Bush, Donald Rumsfeld, etc. Why should neither or either face the consequences of what they have either ordered others to do or have done themselves?

 

Yes, I like that too. "Nazi Ghost Hunters" has a good ring to it as a title for a running docu-soap on one of those crap UK Living-style channels.

 

The Yankee geniuses at torture, mayhem, destruction and killing do stuff like this all the time in Iraq and Afghanistan, Vietnam, and anywhere else the US military goes, including Waco, Texas.

We should start a search for Yankee soldiers who did stuff like this in Korea, Vietnam, Panama, Katanga, etc. etc. and it should include all those genius fly boys that so love to drop napalm and white phosphorous on civilians and resistors alike.

While we are at all the collective guilt in WW2, why shouldn't we also examine the Ashkenazis who were in control of the Nazi government?
Evidence of Ashkenazi control of Nazi party:
Nazi Germany had a special court,
"Intended to enable prominent party members to rid themselves of the stigma of Jewish ancestry,"
Law of April 12, 1938 (Reichsgestzblatt I, 386)
Encyclopedia Britanica 1953, Page 219C Vol. 10
View attachment 16450

 

That's a rather weak answer, isn't it? Unless that is, if you're fine with war criminals walking away from justice all the time or you just don't care and there's (*)(*)(*)(*) all you want to have done about it.

 

Standard US military policy:
"We believe in a war of extermination," said Union Brigadier General Lane.

Union General T. Sherman “I am satisfied we have no other remedy for this ambush firing than to hold the neighborhood fully responsible, though the punishment may fall on the wrong parties,”

"We are not fighting against enemy armies, but against an enemy people, both young and old, rich and poor, and they must feel the iron hand of war in the same way as organized armies." US General Sherman

1902 in another attempt to "clean" for "world order"
US General Jacob H. Smith tells the commanding officer of the Marines assigned to clean up the island of Samar, Philippines:
"I want no prisoners.
I wish you to kill and burn;
the more you kill and burn the better it will please me."
He orders that the entire island of Samar be converted into a "howling wilderness." He specifically orders that all males over the age of ten are to be shot. Step one is to burn the town of Balangiga to the ground.

We did this to German & Japan, Saipan, Korea, Vietnam, Philippines, Iraq etc. etc. So obviously it is still standard US military policy to target civilians.
Here's one of the US's favorite democracy gurus telling the people of South Ossetia how much he loves them a few hours before he attempts to cleanse them from life on Earth:

 

Can you make a comment on the actual topic here? This is not about collective guilt but about a murder.

 

Perhaps Jack is just fine with any and all murderers walking away unpunished as long as they are over a certain age?

 

Well perhaps your country's prosecutor should do his job too then?

 

Who they murdered might be a part of his indifference in this case...

 

I couldn't agree more.
The ethnicity of the botht the victim and the killer is all that concerns him.
If a joo has been doing the killing, instead of a nazi, he would be up in arms.

 

Good Ole Eisenhower killed millions of Germans by starvation and expsoure, AFTER the war supposedly ended. It didn't really end, did it?

According to Bacque, given the extraordinarly harsh conditions imposed upon them by the Allies - USA, at least 9.3 million and possibly as many as 13.7 million Germans, had, by 1950, needlessly died as a result.

He writes: "This is many more Germans than died in battle, air raids and concentration camps during the war. Millions of these people slowly starved to death in front of the victors' eyes every day for years."

Japanese Civilians burned to death by USA

 

Why is it the epitome of virtue for US gunmen to kill civilians & resistors alike in every country we have attacked, but it is wrong for German soldiers to kill resistors?

Answer, if anyone else does it, it is murder. If US gunmen & militants do it, it is democracy or some other crap that the war crazies label our legalized murder.

 

Don't know, wasn't the victim a completely 'Arian' Dutch resistance fighter?

However: If people stuff their impressionable little minds with enough National Alliance videos it may well be that these persons end up as unreasonable Hitler apologetics.

 

Pardon me.

Ask me again, but tell me what answer you would like this time.

 

No.

Just some consistancy would be nice.

But it is ONLY NS war crimes that matter you.

 

By that reasoning, all those that fail to call for the war criminals of the Red Army to be hunted down are indifferent toward rape and child murder (of those in Berlin).

 

*Yawn*.


Topic please?

 

You know I never watch tv, yes? And the last time I even watched anything on it was about two years ago.

Well, tonight I was asked if I could watch my mates dogs, while he went out for a while.

Got a bit bored...turned on the tv, first thing that came on (I kid you not) - BBC4 Old Jews Telling Jokes.

I made a coffee, sat down, watched, expecting it to be a sit com.

No.

It literally WAS just random old Jews...telling old fashioned gags.

What are the odds on that!

 

Not it's not, don't speak for me, or attribute claims like this to me.

 

Shot. Score.!!

You tell 'em Jack.

 

Faux moralists I cannot abide.

Like anyone that wants to hunt down a man of 91 for 'war crimes', but support Zion Nazi Israel today.

Not to mention all the examples that Ivan was good enough to give.

And, as of course, the bastard rapists of the Red Army, who Israel HONOURED.

[video=youtube;TsOouDLL_EA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TsOouDLL_EA[/video]

 

Lol...I've seen it myself. Programme-makers by creating these sorts of programmes play on stereotypes. What next? Young muslims speaking aggressively and idiotically in patwa? Oh, I almost forgot, we've already had Ali G.