A fake plane was added for south tower explosion

Can you link to the original, uncompressed video footage?

 

Of course he can't, he's undoubtedly never seen it.

 

The plane hit the southwest corner of the south tower...the 'orb' was the left side engine on a heavily distorted image of the plane

 

The orb entered the southeast corner of tower 2. I made sure to get the directional stuff correct before posting.

 

No,it didn't....your video is so distorted one can hardly tell what's going on...

 

You need glasses,with the exeption of some hanging debris,they are nearly identical

 

Who the heck is 'Greengrow'? Are you sure you are even on the correct website? Are you just spamming multiple sites with the same nonsense?

The building in your gifs is clearly not the World Trade Center. The World Trade Center towers had windows.

 

Yeah, he's spamming all over the place.

http://www.goldismoney2.com/showthr...ane-was-added-for-south-tower-explosion/page3

http://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=183361&page=2

http://www.zenzoneforum.com/threads/19596-A-fake-plane-was-added-for-south-tower-explosion/page2

http://www.disclose.tv/forum/a-fake-plane-was-added-for-south-tower-explosion-t58702-50.html

http://prince.org/msg/105/366736?&pg=6

 

Prince dot org

Wow.

I'm convinced.

 

That's NOT a 'small hole'....You can clearly see where the engine went through as well as the wing

 

What are the dimensions of that hole in the side of the tower in your picture?

 

She (WB11) first described it as what could be a police helicopter and after she realized it caused the explosion, changed her thoughts in that moment. These women literally got trapped in the twilight zone. If it wasn't a helicopter, (no propeller) it certainly could not have been a plane. A chopper (From WB11) passed west after the orb came from the right/west side.

The orb was the orb, helicopters are helicopters and the computer generated imagery utilized on 911 was a failure. The camera zoom demonstrates how a distant object will show more character detail. The zoom on the orb shows no detail of a helicopter and is way too small to even be considered any type of plane.





[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nKj0H2fCpo4&list=PL1C1F97A9B8B8D8AE&index=30"]9/11 Second Impact (Flight 175) WPIX - Live - YouTube[/ame]
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_caQ9ZsGycY&list=PL1C1F97A9B8B8D8AE&index=95"]9/11 footage Chopper 4 HQ - YouTube[/ame]

 

Once again,there IS NO 'orb'..your videos are of such poor resolution,you can claim anything

 

Hey 7forever, before you post more pictures and videos again, will you tell us what the dimensions are for that hole you say is too small?

 

My work is irrefutable because it's all visual, therefore, no judge, jury, or defense attorney would ever claim the orb was anything other than a ufo. Only simple minded anonymous tools would make that falsehood.

You've all looked at it and simply ignored conclusive proof without any challenge. The people in denial here are a few trolls who vehemently ignore what the films prove, the live footage showed no plane. This man and woman reporter initially said there was no plane in the area because they didn't even see the orb and then started saying the orb was the plane. That's just how twilight zone crazy 911 was for many in the media.





[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mFPB_NTi2cs&list=PL1C1F97A9B8B8D8AE&index=97&feature=plpp_video"]NIST FOIA: WNBC Chopper 4 Clip (Replay of WTC2 Plane Impact) - YouTube[/ame]

 

I'll say this for you, you have big brass ones claiming your 'opinions' are irrefutable..you just don't get that your whole premise of orbs and cgi planes borders on lunacy...

 

So I ask again, who is lying....HFD or 7Forever? Either there was a plane or not. One of you is, by definition, lying.

Which one of you twoofers isn't telling the truth?

 

Lying means intentional deception.. Saying something when you know it to be false.

Having a different belief, isn't "lying".. It's possible that nobody is lying. It's also possible to say something untrue but not be lying.

Perhaps you should rephrase, and ask who is incorrect.

 

At some point the ignorance defense is not applicable. Plane parts all over the place, airline passengers who all died when the parts began to scatter, hundreds of different video cameras capturing a plane hitting the building, the plane never being seen again.

Those who say there was no airplane are lying. Plain and simple. You're loyalty to your movement is really pretty pathetic.

 

People believe things even when overwhelming evidence proves it wrong.. It does happen.. Most rational skeptics would say "how can you believe something so ridiculous" as opposed to you trying to accuse people of lying.. Which technically undermines the other people trying to call them delusional.. Because saying they are lying means you are saying they know the real case anyway, so they're no longer out of touch.

 

I would imagine being as spineless as you sound has advantages. I don't see them though. Pfft!

 

This is what I got for the main part of each hole. There were 5 broken beams for tower 2 and 15 for 1. The width of these holes would approximately be 25 and 75 feet. I counted 57 beams, not including the corners. The point is simple; Whatever hit T2 was smaller or maybe more probable, T1 was rigged with more sophisticated explosives.

 

Your lame attempt to spread disinformation concerning the hole size is easily refuted.

http://www.questionsquestions.net/WTC/review.html

 

The width of these holes would approximately be 17 and 52 feet. I counted 57 beams, not including the corners. I rounded it to 60 beams. 15/60=0.25x208=52 feet. The point is simple; Whatever hit T2 was smaller or maybe more probable, T1 was rigged with more sophisticated explosives.

 

Reposting your opinions won't make them true