By Dana Milbank, Tuesday, May 29, 2:41 PM The time has come for Mitt Romney to prove it once and for all: Is he or is he not a unicorn? Let me stipulate that I have no proof that Romney is a unicorn, and indeed I want to believe that he is not. But I have not seen proof of this because he has not released the original copy of his long-form birth certificate. There are many others who feel as I do 18,000 people to be precise. I first began to consider the possibility that Romney might be a unicorn when I heard that LeftAction, an online petition operation created by Democratic PR guy John Hlinko, was campaigning to get the Arizona secretary of state to certify that the presumptive Republican nominee is not a mythical beast before allowing his name to be on the presidential ballot. There has never been a conclusive DNA test proving that Mitt Romney is not a unicorn, the group wrote last week. And if Mitt Romney is or may be a unicorn, he is not Constitutionally qualified to be president. The mittromneyisaunicorn¬.com campaign came about because Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett, citing allegations that the birth certificate President Obama released is a fraud, threatened to take the incumbent off the ballot. Obviously, the likelihood that Romney is a fanciful equine is no more plausible than the claim that Obama was born in Africa. So why is the unicorn fair game? Because Romney has made it so. For the full article, go to... http://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...eir-own-ploy/2012/05/29/gJQAvNDRzU_print.html
If someone claims it is so on the Internet then it must be so. Why hasn't Romney denied he is a unicorn?
Just thought I'd mention that the GOP, years ago, had no problem seriously considering the Mittster's father, George, as a possible presidential candidate, and George was born in Mexico. Hypocrisy, anyone?
