ABC News: Emails Show White House LIED About Benghazi Story "Revisions"

so you say

and she's out of her former position as secretary anyway

what do you want to do about it now, really i want to know what punishment you think hillary should get?

any idiot in mayberry knows a goober is a peanut

unless maybe he was born yesterday

 

Well, because it wasn't a very big deal back then, if you search these forums, you'll find no references to security at the Benghazi facility prior to 9/11/12.

Have you ever managed 60,000 people? You don't talk to all 60,000, you have management team, of maybe a dozen people who you actually interact with on a regular basis, and each one of them has a team of a dozen or so and each one of them, etc. Get the picture?
So something like responding to requests for additional security, which there are probably dozens a day, falls to someone way down the fake food chain.
So while there is a probably someone who works for an Assistant Deputy Under Secretary somewhere that handled those emails, I doubt they cc'd Clinton.

 

So it has ben PROVEN. She should be INDICTED, and tried for LYING to CONGRESS, under oath.

Jailtime not necessary, just an OFFICIAL RECORD as a CONVICTED LIAR, will do.

How about the WHITE HOUSE LIES?

Those should go UNACCOUNTED FOR?


NIXON RESIGNED for LESS...a LOT LESS.

 

what's your budget for that?

you don't seem to have a clue what 'proven' means

didn't she say, "what difference does it make?"

 

But Nixon cared for and loved America and didn't want to drag America through his inevitalbe impeachment and further soil America's good name... He had honor and respect for Amerca....OWEblamer, not so much..... OWEBlamer, we know, hates America and lacks the class to stand up, take responsibility and resign. He's still out to "fundimentally transform America" in to a 3rd world nation so he'll not go unless physically removed by his puppet masters--- or Americans.

 

Or unless they believe Saddam had WMDs he hid in Syria or that tax cuts balance budgets...

- - - Updated - - -

Nixon resigned because if he didn't he'd lose his pension, and his secret service, and his lifetime expenses.

 

Why sure it wasn't.

Fortunately "these forums" aren't where I do my searching for data, such as this CIA report from APRIL, 2012:


State Department spokesman Victoria Nuland raised specific objections to this paragraph drafted by the CIA in its earlier versions of the talking points:

"The Agency has produced numerous pieces on the threat of extremists linked to al-Qa'ida in Benghazi and eastern Libya. These noted that, since April, there have been at least five other attacks against foreign interests in Benghazi by unidentified assailants, including the June attack against the British Ambassador's convoy. We cannot rule out the individuals has previously surveilled the U.S. facilities, also contributing to the efficacy of the attacks."


Which, of course, was COMPLETELY DELETED per the LYINGASS OBAMA ADM., in keeping with their Lie Always policy on Benghazi, as the OP emails PROVE.

Keep going, make up some MORE NONSENSE. How about I post the REPEATED REQUESTS for SECURITY in Libya...and then I get to WRITE YOUR SIG for a month?

Whaddaya say?


State Dept. acknowledges rejecting requests for more security in Benghazi


The State Department acknowledged Wednesday that it rejected appeals for more security at its diplomatic posts in Libya in the months before a fatal terrorist attack in Benghazi as Republicans suggested that lapses contributed to the deaths of the U.S. ambassador and three other Americans.

Republicans also tried to use a congressional hearing to poke holes in the Obama administration’s public explanations for what happened in Benghazi on Sept. 11, accusing the White House of playing down the possibility that the incident was a successful al-Qaeda assault.

Security officials on the ground “repeatedly warned Washington officials of the dangerous situation” in Libya, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, said in his opening statement. “Washington officials seemed preoccupied with the concept of normalization.”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world...195faa-12e6-11e2-a16b-2c110031514a_story.html


Adn OBAMA wanted to KEEP UP THE LIE, until AFTER THE ELECTION.

Wanna make up some more bullcrap?

It was "no big deal" ONLY TO IDIOTS...,like the Obama Adm.

 

We'll take the money from one of OWEblamer's vacations... that would cover it several times over.

 

what a joke

haven't they already spent more than that?

try to get a grip on reality, your jokes are stupid

 

Yeah, that was it. How asinine can you get?


I guess Clinton should be returning his over $1 Million per anum stipens (including pension, SS protection, office, travel and other expenses) then.

 

Now, it;s not a question of the Obama Adm getting CAUGHT LYING THROUGH THEIR TEETH, to hide their culpability in the assasination of our ambassador; now, we have to have investigating their NAUSEATING CRIMINALITY "budgeted".

See? There is NO DEPTH TOO LOW for the Obamites to stoop...

 

you could go so far as to think nixon was honorable and cared about americans

your side is who's stooping, again

over every little bump in the road

 

I guess when the joke is on you, everything is a joke.

How would you know?

You first.

 

No, I think Hicks was threatened, and I would love for this to be revealed. These lying pieces of (*)(*)(*)(*) need to be exposed

 

Deaths and a cover up. They're just bumps in the road forward

 

Compared to OWEblamer?... you bet!

Um... I guess that's what some one who habitually throws people under a bus would call thosel 4 dead Americans that were abandoned by his adminstration. Thanks for pointing that out!

 

what would you call someone that threw all our soldiers that died over WMD that never existed? people die in war, hindsight is 20\20

remember the Bush admin pressers trying to tie Iraq to 9-11 after no WMD was found?

.

 

The CIA told Obama and minions the day after the attack that it was an al qaeda affiliate, and then 5 days later, he trotted out Susan Rice with lying bull(*)(*)(*)(*) of it being a demonstration. Libturd loons refuse to look at the facts.

 

Try and remember what the subject of this thread is about, it has nothing to do with Bush. So quit making your stupid ass excuses and stay focused, Obama and minions (*)(*)(*)(*)ed up, try and man up and own it.

 

get real, it's a comparison to the current topic

 

I don't know, since even in 20/20 hindsight, we KNEW that WMD did exist because Saddam had used them on his own people. What we didn't know was if he still had them.

And you are correct about people dying in war... but they shouldn't die in a US embassy durning an "overseas contengency operation".

Nope. I do remember how the left tried to tie Bush to trying to tie Iraq to 9-11 though. Maybe you can provide some real evidnece that has not already been debunked?

 

the crook lost a long time ago, obama won twice

would like to bet on an obama impeachment?

you realize nobody really got thrown under a bus, right?

notice how i didn't say or even insinuate that deaths and a cover up are bumps in the road

 

"Bush: Iraq is one victory in war on terror"

http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/05/01/sprj.irq.bush.speech/

""The battle of Iraq is one victory in a war on terror that began on September 11th, 2001, and still goes on." " -- Bush

.

 

it could have merely been a political passion of the moment. why were we not informed that we would be paying higher gas prices for a war on terror?

 

Um... the war on terror....not just Iraq or because we blame Iraq for 9-11. And like the left did back then, you think you can regurgitate something that has already been debunked and protend it to be something new? Try as you might, that quote doesn't tie Iraq to 9-11... that only correctly identifies Iraq as a terrorist nation that supports terrorists and terrorism-- not al-queda... the ones responsible for 9-11. Show me a quote where Iraq is being identied as being responsible for 9-11. It doesn't exisit The link only exists in the lefts mind because they want so badly for it to be true.