Alabama’s Draconian Abortion Ban Has Women On Twitter Ready To Fight

I can't make any sense out of your post and I have no idea how this relates to the question of whether or not it is justifiable to stigmatize all people who have children out of wedlock.

 

Not according to EVERY court in the United States and most other countries.

 

Why break up?

Marriage is better because it requires a committment that shacking up does not

Unfortunstely in our no fault, casual sex, liberal culture divorce rates are higher also

 

It is certainly justifable when the moms collect welfare

And when fatherless kids roam the streets with guns

And when graduation rates are low and prison populations are high

And where mentally disturbed boys want to cut off their penis

and equally disturbed women want to sew them on

 

Whether it's "minor" or not it is up to the woman to decide......YOU do not get to judge how important it is to others

 

If it was signed why isn't it the law?

 

Do uou not think a teenager is a human being ?

Or an adult?

We are human beings from conceotion to death

 

Cherry picking anecdotes is not justification for stigmatizing everyone who has kids but is not married. This is generalization fallacy for one.. a violation of the Rule of law for 2 - as you are punishing one person for the actions of another - and violating the equal justice principle.

For someone who claims to have respect for the principles of Republicanism - you sure are engaging in a heck of alot of disrespect for the principles of Republicanism.

 

FoxHastings:How many times do you need to be told that a baby exists at birth.

There are different names for different things....it's how we communicate….if all things were called one word then communication wouldn't be possible.

If one wants to call a fetus a "baby" then why not call it a teenager or an adult...?? They are all stages of life..

I am not responsible for what another poster writes and it was YOU who asked the question.

chris155au said: ↑
When do you think a baby exists?


When do you think a child exists?""""""""""




Now, can you address my complete post? Or is there a problem????

 

What is "secular" marriage?

 

WHERE EXACTLY did "libs" say they want a rapist's " child" killed ?

NO where.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
Why?

Living together saves on lawyer fees for the break ups...

We are off topic but you sure contradicted yourself in that post

"marriage requires a commitment but divorce rates are high"...HILARIOUS!!

 

You want the right of women to abort the presumed unborn child of a rapist

 

In an imperfect world there are often contridictions

But the higher you set your ambition the better the result will be

 

I want women to have the right to abort or not depending on how THEY feel.


What TF can't Anti-Choicers get about the word CHOICE ? It's only six letters!!!!

 

You keep jumping around - ignoring the topic being discussed and jumping to another as if we were never having that conversation.

How is being raped a good excuse to have a child - while someone should not have a child if they are single.

And then what is this nonsense about libs wanting to kill children ?

Regardless - the above has nothing to do with "Couples" = not single women, having children - which is the claim we were discussing.

You really dislike individual liberty - whether it is the previous topic or this one.

 

Gee, Thanks for the Hallmark card …..it's contradictions, not contridictions.

 

A lot of conservatives are pro-choice.

 

Womendo not have the moral right to kill innocent human beings

 

I bet you know without me telling you

Single women who are raped are pregnant through no fault of their own

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
I want women to have the right to abort or not depending on how THEY feel.


What TF can't Anti-Choicers get about the word CHOICE ? It's only six letters!!!!

You did not address my post you quoted.


Women do not have a right , whether "moral" or not, to kill innocent human beings and NO ONE SAID THEY SHOULD.

 

Obviously - but why you are saying this and what you are responding to I have no clue. You might as well have stated the moon is not made of green cheese as it is just as relevant to what we were discussing.

The airforce is being more open about UFO sightings - which happen through no fault of their own. I bet you know this without me telling you.

 

There is no demarcation. We just have to go by a case-by-case basis.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
How many times do you need to be told that a baby exists at birth.

There are different names for different things....it's how we communicate….if all things were called one word then communication wouldn't be possible.

If one wants to call a fetus a "baby" then why not call it a teenager or an adult...?? They are all stages of life..

WHERE EXACTLY DID I INDICATE THAT A TEENAGER WASN'T A HUMAN BEING?



NO WHERE.....you should leave your imagination at the door......

 

So married women are at fault???