Alabama’s Draconian Abortion Ban Has Women On Twitter Ready To Fight

BUSH started the war in Iraq....history, like science , won't disappear because you deny it.

 

We got a ton of excellent reliable data from a muslim still held. Muslims enjoy torture.

Women get no mercy.

 

Yes, you just keep claiming that NO Republican was ever for war or supported war ....I'm sure their might be someone on Mars who would believe you

 

Wrong. Democrats refused to enact law to allow abortions. I notice when an election shows up. suddenly Democrats make it a huge issue.

 

YES and if an American woman commits the "crime" of getting pregnant Reublicans want to punish her with pain and physical damage...

 

====

Why should they care about them? They're not in somebody else's body.

 

They can write it, but if it's a constitutional amendment, the only thing the Supreme Court can't overturn, it would take a 2/3rds vote in Congress, 3/4 vote of the States. At this time, it would not make it.

As an aside, it was the 13th Amendment that constitutionally ended slavery, not a bill passed by Congress and signed by the President.

 

Hell no, I blast Abraham lincoln, a republican all the time for waging war on this nation's people.
I mainly blast GHW Bush for not wrapping up his war against Saddam.

But I have accurately assessed all of this nation's wars and Democrats lead the parade by a wide margin.

Other than Abe the republican Democrats have ordered into combat and cost this nation far more lives in many wars than say GW Bush in both of his wars.

 

You see how you babble. Let some poster misrepresent your words and you blast them immediately. But you did it to me.

You compounded your eff up by capitalizing the word no.

 

You are talking like a man or woman (sorry not sure) desiring to impeach Trump.

I am going to clarify so you don't get it wrong.

Democrats since 1973 have dominated the Congress. When they had Democrat presidents they would happily agree to the Democrats law.

We do not get to decide what the supreme court would do. They approved the illegal ACA on one point alone.

Abortion per the Democrat myth machine is so popular it easily could be law. Sure making it an amendment seals it up probably forever. But according to the Democrat myth, they are far more popular than are Republicans.

If your case is that states won't approve an amendment, at the same time it instructs Democrats on why Hillary lost the election. Too few states accepted her.

 

We all know what smartphones are.

GW Bush conducted two brilliant wars and defeated Muslims.

 

I do not believe you are quoting as you shout, even one republican saying such things.

 

Bush actually was led into war by the authority of the Clinton law. Try again. Bush had heard when he was Governor of TX all the claims by Democrats, including Bill Clinton that Saddam definitely had WMD and so he (Clinton) signed a law that authorized the removal of Saddam from office.

As to the WMD, Clinton and Democrats were quite accurate that Saddam had them. General Georges Sada of Iraq documents those in his excellent book, Saddam's Secrets.

I actually agree that Bush removed Saddam from Kuwait and Southern Iraq yet lost around 385 lives to combat. His son lost about 130 when he defeated Saddam.

 

I missed your aside, Are you announcing that Congress had nothing to do with that amendment?

You are the first poster to claim that.

States as a rule do not write amendments and take them to Congress to see if a president will sign the new law.

I can't name even one amendment created by the states legislators except the founding documents.

Abraham Lincoln

Formally abolishing slavery in the United States, the13th Amendment was passed by Congress on January 31, 1865, and ratified by the states on December 6, 1865. Joint Resolution Submitting 13th Amendment to the States; signed by Abraham Lincoln and Congress.


Aug 1, 2018 <has to be date of the published remark above>

 

Do you mean with tools used in the abortion? Seems that is your claim.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
YES and if an American woman commits the "crime" of getting pregnant Reublicans want to punish her with pain and physical damage...

Of course they're not SAYING it, but they are DOING IT.

Just because you deny pregnancy and child birth harm women or cause pain doesn't mean pregnancy and childbirth don't cause physical damage and pain..

..and NO, I don't give a crap what your many wives had to say about it..

 

Seems odd to me that you would think of abortion as being wrong for you, but right for others. Is not a wrong a wrong for all? Or does the child being aborted play no part in your thought process?

It reminds me of the "safe, legal, and rare" mantra that abortionists all want to cling to; as though making abortion safe and legal is ever going to make it rare. Not going to happen. Instead, it will only make it more prevalent.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
YES and if an American woman commits the "crime" of getting pregnant Reublicans want to punish her with pain and physical damage...

HERE you claim Republicans want to use the tools of abortion LOL! You are getting a little confused

 

Uh, I didn't see anyone saying that making abortion safe and legal would make it rare.

What they said was let's make abortion safe, legal AND rare.

By making it rare they meant creating a society that pays living wages so women can afford kids, doesn't denigrate women who have kids, and cares for pregnant women and sees that they, and their CHILDREN, get proper health care.
THAT is what would make it rare.

 

What Democratic party instruction did that come from?

They are doing what?

By law all states have the right to create laws.

Had the Democrats wanted but you can't admit is that to them is is a campaign issue and as much control as Democrats have had since 1973 they easily could have made it a Federal law.

I do not think i am in error that the Supreme court is not the legislative body.

Abortion causes physical damage and pain. How often have you taken care of a woman just done with an abortion to understand she is in deep pain and deep distress. She mourns her child. She knows she will never hold her baby.

 

My point: 3/4 of the country don't support abortion by choice. The reason: too much religion, too little reason.

 

What I am saying: There is a lot more involved than simple majority votes and Presidential signatures. You need a constitutional amendment to solidify Roe vs Wade, or a Supreme Court ruled by objectivity and not social mores or mystical insight. The right to privacy is delusional; the right to life is existential, and recognized and honored as such in the Declaration of Independence.

 

Republicans are not pro using tools that harm the woman and cause her to suffer more than pain,. a dreadful remorse that she killed her baby.

 

There is a huge body of law that is not any of the amendments as you outline. I agree that the claim of a right to privacy is bogus.

As I proved, a court did not end slavery, the opposite, it approved slavery. While the process ended up as an amendment, it was done by congress and Abe the outlaw Lincoln.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
YES and if an American woman commits the "crime" of getting pregnant Reublicans want to punish her with pain and physical damage...




Of course they're not SAYING it, but they are DOING IT.

Just because you deny pregnancy and child birth harm women or cause pain doesn't mean pregnancy and childbirth don't cause physical damage and pain..

..and NO, I don't give a crap what your many wives had to say about it..

The fact that some abortions cause pain does NOT negate women's right to CHOOSE whether to have one or gestate.

Being FORCED to suffer the pain and damage is the CLEAR issue here.


If you choose to dismiss it that doesn't mean it will disappear.

NO, all women do NOT mourn their fetus if they have an abortion, MOST women say they feel a sense of relief.