Alabama drive-in won't show Disney movie because of gay character

No kidding. There are cinema that show pornography and cinema that don't. Is that controversial?

 

Not at all. Pick the one that falls in your taste. The bigger the supply, the happier the customer.

 

Immoral is a whole other discussion. I am talking about legal.

I am not talking about you or me. I am a straight, white man and have never experienced this. I am talking about my fellow Americans and I am not okay with double standards under the law.

Just to be clear, you agree that a tax payer who served in the military is less of a citizen because she is gay?

 

Well, no it isn't legal to discriminate against people based on five protected classes.

Well, it's written into the constitution.

I don't understand how you wrenched that nonsense out of my words. No n If you want me to clarify ask me to clarify verses making up nonsense.

 

Those 5 protected classes did not exist when the constitution was written. (It was legal to own slaves and women couldn't vote) Why have we since given equal rights to minorities and women

If you believe it is okay for one group to enjoy legal protection for their beliefs while denying the exact same protection for others for their beliefs, you have given one citizen priority over another. Why is one belief superior to the other?

I did not put words in your mouth, I asked a question. (Thus the question mark at the end!)

 

Right, it was an amendment. To amend something is to add to it.

Um...all religions are protected.

I answered your question. That isn't a clarification. It's made up horse ****. I've answered it twice now.

 

Which you cannot prove because you provide no scientific evidence to support yourself whatsoever.

I have up to this point quoted every word you said and you have responded with selectively cutting out all the evidence I presented to you without producing a single piece of scientific data to support yourself.

I have given you multiple studies including a very recent one, quoted specifically what backs up the reality of what you are and you have chosen not to respond to any of it.

Come back when you can actually address the studies and their findings. Until then all you have proven is that you don't have the moral fiber to look at the studies and combat their findings.

 

Be specific. How are any of those quotes putting words into anyone's mouth?

I see you left out the fact you were the one who claimed to have the higher educational level specifically because of your position on this issue. Funny how that didn't enter your quote list.

 

I see the dishonesty continues. You can't fathom the reality that these studies actually interviewed homosexuals from multiple backgrounds and drew their conclusions specifically by what their answers are.

You and the rest of the supporters here have proven you cannot address the actual empirical evidence you have been given and instead scream all the research, all the scientists have nothing but opinion to back them up and you refuse to address their research methods or the homosexuals they interviewed to obtain their findings.

Its clear by the refusal to actually discuss the studies and their findings that you all are incapable of having a real debate on this issue so enjoy congratulating yourselves because I'm not going to waste my time arguing with people who refuse to produce any scientific data to back themselves up and run away from the scientific data given to them.

 

It's obvious that most everyone on this forum has a higher education that what your posting style tells us about you.

Why would you want people to prove a claim that they never made a claim about?

 

Good.

I know a lot of people who will not be watching or buying the politicized movie.

Of course the gays will pitch a fit because they cannot stand it when anyone does not bow at the gay altar.

 

What you wrote is classic, textbook bigotry.

 

I am not the one making the positive claim that homosexuality is a mental disorder. The burden of proof isn't on me.

I had to cut things out of my last response to you due to character limits in the post. Further it wasn't evidence that homosexuality is a mental disorder. It was evidence that homosexuals have a higher incidence of having a few issues. A point I made clear in my last post to you that I don't contest.

I must have missed that one. What post was it in?

The findings of the studies you presented didn't indicate that homosexuality is a mental disorder. They indicate that homosexuals have higher instance of mood disorders. You want to leap to the conclusion that it's because they are homosexual.

I'm just not making that leap. You said yourself in one of the studies you cited that the only characteristic the subjects had in common was that they were homosexual but the results didn't produce 100% 90% or even 50% of those with that characteristic exhibiting the psychosis.

I stated that in the post you responded to multiple times. Funny how you omitted that because it pretty much proved homosexuality isn't a mental disorder.

 

I think a lot more will be watching it. The Dana Carvy church ladies flipped out about malifacent because it had "gay undertones" which it didn't. They flipped out over frozen because they said it had gay undertones which it didn't. They flipped out over tinky winky because they thought it was gay. They flipped out over Harry Potter because it would encourage kids to practice witchcraft.

These lunatics flip out over everything. They're like black lives matter. Nobody listens to them anymore except the idiots in their cult.

 

I promise, very few people care that you are boycotting a Disney money because it contains a black... oh wait... because it contains a gay character. You are just like the group that threw a fit over Rue in the Hunger Games being cast by a black girl - pathetic and outdated.

 

And you ran from every single piece of my evidence. Every study and every quote.

All you can do is scream its opinion so its clear nothing will ever convince you if that's how you view scientific studies.

I'm not going to waste my time with someone who is so fanatical they cannot even examine a single piece of scientific data or more importantly, produce any of their own.

 

And there it is once again the equation of race to homosexuality for all those in this thread who deny your side tries so desperately to make that fantasy connection.

Race is a proven genetic trait. Hommosexuality is a personality disorder. The two could not be more different except in the minds of anti science fanatics.

 

I see you've once again declared victory without a single proven fact. Good to see nothing changes.

 

You haven't proven homosexuality is a personality disorder. You ignore the fact that most homosexuals don't exhibit the psychosis that you keep bringing up. A fact you ignore because it pretty much renders your narrative poppycock.

 

You are backed into a corner none of your claims are supported.

The only thing you have done is ignorantly tripple down on the fallacy that Corrilation is causation.

 

Most people don't freak out at the mere presents of a gay character or person. Most people don't believe it's a conspiracy of homos to indoctrinate children.

I once felt that way. I once convinced myself that homosexuality was a mental disorder. It was an attempt at convincing myself that I wasn't.

In all honesty why would these people be so incredibly blinded to the arguments against their narrative?

 

But on the positive side, brother-sister couples get in for free...

 

It is Alabama

 

Yes, I do, and they will end up losing a lot of business over it, and probably go out of business as result. There is a word for punishing people for not agreeing with you. Facism. And that is exactly what liberals are demanding, that business owners be punished if they do anything that is not in support of gay rights. The thing is the same liberals who call for business owners to be punished for refusing to sale to gay couples would happily support the same discrimination if it were reversed. For example, if a black business owner decided he didn't wanna sell to cops in protest of police shootings.

If a business owner does something you don't like, don't give them your business. There are plenty of business owners who are more than happy to sell to gays. A few choosing not to doesn't effect the ability of gay customers to have access to those services. This is about punishing any business owner who doesn't conform, and run their business how liberals think they should.

 

Please prove homosexuality is a personality disorder, any current accredited American medical association will do. Within the past, let's say 10 years...

Please quote me where I said homosexuality is genetic. Why do you insist on making up lies in every post you participate in? Besides you obvious lack of integrity that is. Next you will be demanding I prove homosexuality is genetic even though I never made the claim lol.

If it is anyone who is anti-science, it is you.

And let's not play your little snarky games, you always end up fleeing the thread.