Almost Unbelievable This Still Goes On

Listen to the 1st minute.

For something that has less severity than the cold and flu, why do you need a vacc.. er ine. I'll let Pfauci say it.

 

So, if Greg Reese reported the same story for CNN or ABC etc, it would be different, would it?

 

How does that work, with me being in denial? I am the one providing the info, and you're denying it. BTW, do you think MSM will cover any of the adverse events or deaths, which they haven't so far? Yet individuals and the silenced show cause and effect.
And the medical professionals that knew it all was not right, because they had balls, yet they get shut down, funny that. Also, the fact that the CDC is corrupt as the any other ABC organisations are, alongside the FDA.

Also, explain why thousands of athletes around the world that are young, superfit and in the prime of their lives drop on the field. They couldn't play their sport if they weren't jabbed. No coincidences there. Or do you want to deny that too? https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4969030/

 

~ Goverments are being questioned, people are suspicious. In the U.S. Representative Clyburn said in discussing the coronavirus response, the moment was a “tremendous opportunity to restructure things to fit our vision.”
We could be in for a lesson in compliance ! The next surprise could be another 'Wuhan Special' — perhaps a Marburg virus gain-of-function bomb released accidentally on purpose in the West . Someone should ask Bill Gates ...

 

@Nwolfe35
Ohh, I bet you didn't look at this either. I did post it earlier. Here it is again.

The ex-Pfizer scientist who became an anti-vax hero
https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/health-coronavirus-vaccines-skeptic/

Well fck me, it's from Reuters.

The writing is on the wall...within the article.

​

 

Sounds similar to what Klaus Schwab said, "Covid-19 is a great opportunity to take advantage of. So we can rebuild a better system, a Great Reset", or something very similar.

 

Yeah, and?

The article talks about how the man went from a Pfizer executive/scientist to a anti vax conspiracy nutjob.

From the article: “These claims are false, dangerous and deeply irresponsible,” said a spokesman for Britain’s Department of Health & Social Care, when asked about Yeadon’s views. “COVID-19 vaccines are the best way to protect people from coronavirus and will save thousands of lives.”

 

You are not providing "info". As I have documented on this forum your links are to conspiracy nutjob websites and websites that the State Department have identified as part of Russian disinformation campaigns.

Your denial is that you refuse to accept that what you call "info" is actually "disinfo"

 

He grew a conscience.

 

No, he lost his mind.

 

At least there are some in the medical community who have found and exercised their conscience.

The bulk of them sold their soul to Pharma and WHO a long time ago. The bulk of the medical community in the US stands in line to urinate on the Hippocratic Oath, and that's a shame.

 

The report you link to about athletes does not show “thousands of athletes”. It shows the overall odds being 1 in 52,000 for NCAA atheletes . For the number to be even 1,000 that would mean 52 MILLION athletes. There are only 480,000 NCAA atheletes in all. That gives us a number closer to 10

 

... is Nwolfe35 regurgitate various meaningless left wing buzzwords.

It is not "information". It is information, whether you like it or not.

TOO FUNNY!!!! and these are the buzzwords that I'm talking about... You don't know what you mean when you say them... You just regurgitate what you are told to say.

What websites? Who is behind them?

Is a consensus always correct?
Who is "the medical community"?

Obviously you, as a branch COVIDian, love to hear the sermons preached by the pastors within the Church of COVID.

He's done much more investigation than you have apparently.

 

Can you name a few of these "better websites"?

 

So? BitChute is a video hosting platform... Should I laugh at a video because it is being hosted on YouTube rather than BitChute? Should I laugh at the BitChute hosted video but not at the very same video being hosted on YouTube?

:rotflol: Wikipedia??? :rotflol: For your sake, I'll dissect its nonsense this one time (I typically dismiss Wikipedia on sight for this very reason -- see below)

"Accommodating far-right individuals (whatever THAT is) and conspiracy theorists (whatever THAT is)", and "hosting hate speech" (whatever THAT is), IS the very definition of freedom of expression. Obviously YouTube doesn't support freedom of expression. Obviously YouTube does not support diversity like BitChute does. Obviously YouTube is not very inclusive like BitChute is.

Oh great, a BLOG?! Don't you make fun of people who reference blogs?? Just not if YOU reference them, right?? Anyway, let's dissect this pile of garbage too while we're at it...

Holy buzzword soup! WTF does any of that even mean?? Anyway, allowing different points of view IS allowing free speech. Obviously ADL are not very inclusive nor pro-diversity, eh?

Projection.

 

I don't believe you, as evidenced by your posts on this forum.

I don't believe you, as evidenced by your posts on this forum.

Facts are not something that one "gets". Facts are 'assumed predicate'. That's all that facts are. Facts are not universal truths, nor are they proofs.

... such as??

Calling them names doesn't alter the validity of their claims.

Who cares what video hosting platform is hosting the video??

Yes, you're quite good at name calling... that's not presenting a valid argument though...

 

Do YOU?

I haven't seen you rationally critique a single opposing argument a single time during my entire time on this forum.

 

Projection.
NPCism.

You don't even know what a fact is. A fact is simply an assumed predicate. It is not a universal truth nor is it a proof of any sort.

What rational person would accept bulverism and buzzwords as a rational argument?

Correct. None.

The projection on your part couldn't be any stronger than it is right now.

 

So his claim is false because some other person says that it is false?? Wow, way to think for yourself there!! Way to be rational!! Way to build a valid argument!!!

 

Yes he is, and YOU are not providing valid arguments of any sort.

You have not documented anything. You have simply made meaningless claims based on buzzwords. You trust the State Department??

You refuse to accept that you are being conned by groups such as the State Department.

 

How would you know?

 

I hate to burst your little right wing bubble but I not only know what the terms mean, I used them specifically because they apply to the websites UNT uses as the source of his “information” (I also know what it means to put that word in quotes and I used them intentionally as well.)

I did more investigation on the source of his information in 10 minutes then he has apparently done in his 3 months of being on this forum.

 

It must be a very scary place inside your head. The entire US Government is out to get you. Enemies lurking in every shadow.
Gosh why are you even using the internet? Don’t you know that’s how “they” track you?

 

So his claims are valid just because he says so? Way to think for yourself there.

 

Someone that worked for Pfizer and spoke out about his industry is a nutjob, hey. Seems to be that the description comes from one who can't discern the difference between a moral & ethical compass that works to one that doesn't.