Already Tom Perez is demonizing Trump.

Clinton Surrogate Pitched Reporter Birther Story In 2008

You got that right.....it's one of the multitude of reasons why Hillary lost.

 

Yessss . . . and Hillary IS going to win in 2016. As for Perez, he's just another racist and hate-filled radical leftist, indistinguishable from all the others currently ruining the Dem Party. He will merely help hasten that Party's demise.

 

That would be sweet!

 

As I understand what happened, Hillary and her bunch froze out Bill Clinton -- the Party's only living, real Great Communicator who knew how average people think and how to communicate with them -- in favor of arrogant young punk 'political advisers' who'd never actually worked for a living but who KNEW what SOUNDED clever in sound bites because their shallow friends said so. The rest is history.

 

your post suggests a putin troll. what clinton did or said is of no account . the birther in chief is still a sleazy person.

 

The question is why shouldn't Trump be demonized? Most of the stuff he gets demonized for comes from his own milk dud of a brain.

 

Pssst . . . because the independents who voted Trump into office do not believe in the Left's lies -- we know this because the left's media outlets are continuing to lose in polling returns asking if people trust what they say. Resoundingly the replies are "No!" So if this tactic were working for the Left then more and more people would already be trusting in the Mainstream Media, but they don't. Hence not only is it not working for the Left it is progressively -- ha! -- backfiring on them.

 

When you talk about the media in this context, it just comes off to me as paranoia speaking, because the media is not out to get you personally. And more accurately, you technically cannot be "Independent," it is more accurate to say you are politically confused. I think you would even agree its hypocritical for someone to say they don't trust MSNBC, but will trust Fox News or InfoWars. I think Trump could lie - just like he has about draining the swamp and having Mexico pay for the walls, to you in person and you still would be in disbelief or denial. That's if, we are being honest with ourselves.

 

The death of the MSM is its own self perpetuating cycle.

Website clicks and ad revenue is falling so MSM tries more sensational headlines. People read articles and find that the content rather pedestrian and/or highly biased. Those same people are less likely to click the next sensationalist headline. MSM repeats the process.

It would be nice to see a media source that just reports what happened. No spin, no sensationalism, no bias, and most importantly, no unnamed sources that may or may not actually exist.

 

Translation: The leftist having had an assertion refuted then goes on a personal attack. Psssst . . . does anyone think that it worked?

 

Yep, and as things stand now it is a classic negative feedback loop. Just think about all those college educated IDIOTS utterly incapable of comprehending that by their own ideologically-infused bad habits they are collectively and progressively destroying their own careers and business vehicles.

 

I wasn't going on a personal attack.

It simply is more accurate to say you are politically confused than an "Independent" since being a "Independent" technically does not exist.

 

True, the strategy of hatred and lies did work just fine fir our GOP, or maybe it was for thecYrumpeizda wing of the GOP,

 

Well, of course Perez is demonizing trump. What else would you do with a demon?

 

So let me understand this. If Hillary had been elected, you would have been just fine with "the truth about her and her deeds". The way she looked into the eyes of the families of the Benghazi dead and purposely lied about how they died. Her general incompetence as SOS, and that the FBI found that she and her staff "were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information". Her admission that she she has “both a public and a private position” on Wall Street reform and is reliant on wealthy donors to fund her campaign. I could go on, but you hopefully get the message.

How do you reconcile being outraged by anything Trump, yet have been perfectly fine with a Hillary Clinton who's reprehensible deeds may never be matched. I'd really like to understand what appears to be an obvious hypocrisy. Maybe you can explain.

 

He didn't go nearly far enough. He should have said, the year America voted away liberty and died.

 

What liberties is he proposing taking away?

 

"The resistance" by the dems is a joke. They are politically impotent by their own doing.

 

The fact is---------------------------democrats have little left except name calling. Let the idiot name call like a 4 year old.