American Beaten by Muslims in London for Drinking Beer in 'Sharia Zone'

You are breaking the forum rules. To a white Nationalist of course the fact that I supported Israel unconditionally would be something to throw at someone for is that not supporting the Jews, something which no one could to them do anything worse.

 

Nothing apart from 30yrs of UNCONDITIONAL support to the racist state of Israel.

- - - Updated - - -

You asked which state.

I showed you which state, the racist apartheid state, so please, stop lecturing anyone on here, me, Jew, or otherwise.

Thanks

 

I am not interested in your crazy replies. I very rarely read any of your posts. I generally occasionally reply if I see one that is too over the top that someone else has replied to. You are being dishonest as well as breaking the forum rules. I asked you to provide the link to the post you were quoting for context. This you have not done.

You shave shown nothing to prove racism, now provide the link.

 

Link to what?

Are you denying now the words are your words now?

 

so what. I do not have any neurosis about supporting Israel in my early life due to the holocaust.

I suggest you provide the quote which does show racism.

 

Link to where you are quoting me for. You have totally derailed this thread because you were crying at being shown your inability to accept that there was proof your views are those of the far right in the UK and are proven wrong by statistics. No I AM NOT A WHITE NATIONALISTS. I have no problem Jews. To you it would be the worst possible thing but I am not you.

 

This could be an indicator.....

http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=325148&page=40

- - - Updated - - -

No one said you were.


Quote where I said you were?

 

Lol, this is so funny.

You ask me which state.

I tell you.

You go "report report".

You ask for the link.

I give it. "The rules, the rules" you default to.

If you don't want it, don't ask for it.

And stop judging others and calling them racist, because I have never offered 30yrs or ANY years of unconditional support to Israel. Had I done so, I might be reeling it on the lectures.

 

All of it because it's the truth.

 

Keep it on topic, please!!!

 

Be specific and prove this "truth" please..

 

Apparently there are some Englishmen who think their nation is still in the Middle Ages. Fer Crissake, doncha know that's all really expensive playtime nowadays?

Has it never occurred to you that it's YOUR right to due process you want to deny people? I mean, once you start doing it to any "feral looking thug" unfortunate enough to run into your SA what's to stop one of them from finding YOU, out and about and looking kind of "feral" one night.

In fact, isn't this just what you're objecting to?

I address this to all the other supporters Jack has in this thread. I know he has me on ignore. Suing people is limp, eh?

 

1 white guy beaten in london...and all of a sudden britain is under attack from muslims.

lmao.

 

The released photos show the victim is a black man and he may have been targeted because of his race and the attackers should be charged with a hate crime. The suspects are believed to be mostly young Asians of Bengali descent but one suspect captured clearly in the still photo may be a white Briton.

Anyone who can help is asked to contact Tower Hamlets CID on 020 7275 4546 or Crimestoppers on 0800 555 111. http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/francesco-hounye-video-brutal-attack-2482587

 

You have to leave emotional arguments to one side, and be logical and face up to facts, not facts as cultural marxists would like them to be. People generally do not want to live in a multi ethnic/racial town or area or town.

It is nothing to do with skin tone, and everything to do with social, behavioural, and cultural factors. Simple as that.

You can see that in London. The ethnics move in en masse - the natives move out en masse.

Not as a result of some mass meeting they had, at which they decided they would all be "hateful racists", but as a gradual and organic reaction, because it is natural that they prefer to live among their own. It is also logical that if you import the second or third world, the second or third world is what you get. And large parts of London resemble it.

No one in their right mind would choose to live among that. I suspect that many of those self styled "anti racists", probably champion from it, from sububia.

If a Londoner had wanted to live among that, he would have moved to Pakistan or something. A lot of the ethnics come here and simply want to replicate the culture and ways that the supposedly "wanted to get away from".

It wouldn't be so bad if the culture was(ex) Japanese. But even then you would still have to be responsible with demographics. It is a totally different story if it is Pakistani's or Somalians and not Japanese. Based on real and genuine factors.

The "anti racist" crowd are really doing no one any favours, if anything, by way of throwing an arrogant deaf ear to reasonable objections by the host people, they will serve to damage race relations more than any other thing, and they will hasten problems.

The "anti racist" never wants to hear let alone understand fair points and objections, and all they serve to do is eventually alienate themselves with the mainstream.

London has become like a mirror of the Near East. You have a large number of mainly Muslim immigrants, many not well educated or well off. Very tribal and with a chip on their shoulder.

Then you have Jews with cheesing off residents, the secular and humanist society, by draping wires and poles etc all over the place, turning them into some sort of Jewish religous zone.

No one wants this, other than those that benefit directly from it. People are saying they do not want it. It is very dangerous not to listen to the people, and to keep arrogantly ignoring them.

That kind of crap has no place in modern London in 2013, that is going backwards not forwards. That is not a modern and progressive society.

If you took a national vote on this today, it would be declared a big fat NO TO IT, which is why we never get asked.

It will get nasty in the end though, and all those that stifled the voices of the reasonable will have played a massive part in it(but as usual take no resp).

 

How is this any different from someone going to a black ghetto in the USA and shouting a few racist slogans? Technically both individuals had a perfect right to do what they did, but their behavior shows a clear desire to qualify for a Darwin Award.

 

It doesn't need to be a ghetto, London has a gang problem, though not as entrenched as the USA, and wearing the wrong "colors" could be what it's about, despite the OP's race histrionics.

 

Time to close our borders with scotland. Let them breed with their family members.

 

Muslims are already doing that:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...essor-Steve-Jones-warns-inbreeding-risks.html

- - - Updated - - -

What race is Islam? Or are you referring to the Muslims who attacked a black man?

 

Nonsense, in the case of the US, we were attacked by Jihadists since the early 90s, long before Bush was president. The Muslim war on 'infidels' has been going on since 611 AD, save for the several hundred year interlude that is now ending.

 

It will never be allowed to happen in the U.S. we still have our guns and we build homemade bombs better than the Muslims, if the Islamic Imperialists try to pull that (*)(*)(*)(*) here there won't be a single Mosque left standing.

 

The USA is fully responsible for rampaging jihadists around the globe. Whenever it suited your geostrategic interest, you were in bed with them. U.S. government trained them, financed them and armed them. In Afghanistan in 80's, in Chechnya in 90's, in the Balkans in 90's, in Libya and now in Syria. You keep making deals with the devil. The U.S foreign policy makers should finally turn a new leaf and unite with the rest of the world and completely obliterate all radical Muslims around the globe.

 

Number 1) they are Koran following faithful Muslims who do this and have nothing whatsoever to do with Judaism they are walking in the model of their perfect human Mohammad.

Number 2) all the countries you listed are Muslim majority countries, the west unleashed absolutely nothing, it was home grown.

 

Abject (*)(*)(*)(*)ing nonsense, Islam is responsible for rampaging Jihadists around the globe, they are merely following in the footsteps of the original Muslim terrorist the pedophile prophet Mohammad.

Overt lie, they were armed and trained by the Gulf states the U.S. never aided the foreign jihadists but rather the indigenous mujahadeen some of which would go on to form the Taliban but the Taliban has always been domestically oriented not a true member of the global Jihad.

Again more bull(*)(*)(*)(*), there is not a scrap of evidence that the U.S. financed or armed foreign terrorists in either Chechnya or the Balkans.

Again more false bull(*)(*)(*)(*) the U.S. did not fund or arm the foreign jihadists in Libya or Syria, we aided indigenous groups who were largely secular and pro-democratic; such as the FSA, you can spout your revisionist nonsense as much as you like but I don't suggest you try it so close to the actual events because your lies are all the more easily exposed.

 

As dumb as saying because the US was once allied with Stalin, we are responsible for the Cold War and Soviet expansionism. Our goal was never to promote radical Islam.

- - - Updated - - -

Exactly, I'd love to see a crowd of Muslim pigs try to burn cars in say, Texas.