Anomalies in Vote Counts and Their Effects on Election 2020

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by camp_steveo, Nov 29, 2020.

  1. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,672
    Likes Received:
    8,852
    Trophy Points:
    113
  2. peacelate

    peacelate Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2020
    Messages:
    2,483
    Likes Received:
    2,963
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No it was about the roll of poll workers vs. poll watchers. It's an important distinction. People are claiming laws were broken because poll watchers weren't allowed to validate ballot signatures. Poll watchers aren't allowed to verify signatures anyways so what laws were broken? Signatures were being verified by election workers which is why the pre-canvassing and counting took longer than usual. People think poll watchers are entitled to the same function as poll workers which is incorrect.
     
  3. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Like this one you want me to read?

    Former Trump Lawyer Sidney Powell Alleged Voter Fraud in Nonexistent County

    Donald Trump's numerous attempts to have the election results discredited on flimsy technicalities has felt like a test run for a new system to power the country on flop sweat. As case after case has been laughed out of courtroom after courtroom, politics watchers have become accustomed to sights like Rudy Giuliani melting like an archaelogically inclined Nazi.

    But even in the parade of missteps and gaffes, a new detail unearthed by Twitter users stands out: Former Trump lawyer Sidney Powell tried to have Michigan election results overturned by citing fraud in a county that doesn't exist.

    One of the witnesses in Sidney Powell’s new Michigan lawsuit says in a declaration he thinks there’s something fishy about election returns in Edison County, MI. Thing is, there is no Edison County in Michigan. pic.twitter.com/yZfDWMAFSP

    — Jonathan Oosting (@jonathanoosting) November 30, 2020

    Powell has been fired from Trump's official team of election litigators, but that hasn't stopped her from freelance filing several lawsuits that claim the election was illegally stolen from the current president. Couching her simping in legalese and witness statements, Powell paints a picture of a massive conspiracy that involves the manufacturers of voting machines and elites in both parties. In her lawsuit against election officials in Michigan, Powell cited testimony from a person in Edison County, a place that has never existed.

    "In another case for Edison County, MI, Vice President Biden received more than 100% of the votes at 5:59 EST on November 4, 2020 and again he received 99.61% of the votes at 2:23 PM EST on November 5, 2020," the complaint reads. "These distributions are cause for concern and indicate fraud."

    Twitter users pointed out that there is no Edison County anywhere in the United States. It wasn't long before they got their jokes off.


    https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/former-trump-lawyer-sidney-powell-215924115.html

    An attorney fired by her client files lawsuits riddled with typos apparently without even bothering to spell check it and includes a county that doesn't exist in the heart of her argument. Is that the lawsuit you want me to read from an obviously incompetent attorney? This is what you're hoping will overturn the entire Presidential election and hand it to your demented hero? To say this is as pathetic as it gets is to be generously kind. Stick to your day job if you have one, comedy just isn't up your alley.

    You want massive election fraud? Sure, a sitting President squawking fraud for months then trying to steal an election under pretext of an insane conspiracy theory even his staunch loyalists such as AG William Barr dispute is the epitome of fraud. Even going so far as to try to sabotage the Post Office in the process. And you know the real reason he's doing this besides the LOSER's shattered ego? A $170 million scam (and growing) sucked out of the pockets of his devoted boot lickers. How much have you contributed so far?
     
    Independent4ever likes this.
  4. dadoalex

    dadoalex Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2012
    Messages:
    10,894
    Likes Received:
    2,189
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Apparently, you can been watching the news the last 4 weeks?
    And obviously you can indeed fool some of the people all of the time.

    Still does not undo the truth that there is no evidence of any widespread voter fraud and where there is evidence it's insufficient to change the results.
     
  5. Andrew Jackson

    Andrew Jackson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2016
    Messages:
    48,862
    Likes Received:
    32,586
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Obviously.

    All of this non-existent "fraud" BS was dead and buried weeks ago.
     
  6. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,489
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Observers are allowed to question ballots. When observers brought up valid concerns they were ejected. That is against the states election laws. In many cases the machines verify signatures and they were flagging so many the feature was turned off. In another case where military ballots cannot be run but transcribed due to the format, a signature was a swirly circle matched against stick lines.
     
    Last edited: Dec 1, 2020
  7. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,489
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Hard to accomplish that since it is being presented this week.
     
  8. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,489
    Trophy Points:
    113
    How would you know? Have you listened to any of the evidence presented this week?
     
  9. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,489
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Lol, and y’all say don’t listen to internet nonsense.
     
  10. dadoalex

    dadoalex Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2012
    Messages:
    10,894
    Likes Received:
    2,189
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's all in their

    upload_2020-12-1_20-43-30.jpeg
     
  11. dadoalex

    dadoalex Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2012
    Messages:
    10,894
    Likes Received:
    2,189
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Evidence is presented in court. Since these things keep getting tossed with Trump appointed judges telling us "no evidence"

    If by the question you mean have I watched the Trumpinista fantasy sideshows then, no. I don't do sideshows. Got my eyes on the center ring.
     
  12. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,672
    Likes Received:
    8,852
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Terminology and semantics.
     
  13. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,672
    Likes Received:
    8,852
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why is it so difficult to access and read the case filing?
     
  14. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Right. So go listen to a demented CON artist infesting the White House and an incompetent attorney fired by the CON artist's team who files absolute crap that is going to be tossed by any reasonable judge, likely with prejudice. And defend this absurdity yet. And BTW, that's also all on the internet, just about everything is, where have you been?

    What odds would you give that this latest farce masquerading as a lawsuit survives to even reach discovery? I'm going to be generous and say about 100,000 to 1.
     
  15. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why is it so difficult for you to face reality?
     
    ChiCowboy likes this.
  16. Independent4ever

    Independent4ever Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2020
    Messages:
    3,543
    Likes Received:
    3,581
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Dude you really have no clue

    Judges in Edison County Michigan will have no mercy for the democrats. Edison County Judges are not to be messed with
     
    AFM likes this.
  17. Andrew Jackson

    Andrew Jackson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2016
    Messages:
    48,862
    Likes Received:
    32,586
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Those Edison County, MI Judges make Judge Roy Bean look like a Pacifist.

    Stay FAR Away from Edison County, MI.
     
    Independent4ever likes this.
  18. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yeah they have no mercy for Klingons either.
     
    Independent4ever likes this.
  19. Enuf Istoomuch

    Enuf Istoomuch Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2018
    Messages:
    663
    Likes Received:
    524
    Trophy Points:
    93
    "Anomalies in Vote Counts and Their Effects on Election 2020"

    So much nonsense! Something around three dozen lawsuits have all been heard and dismissed. A few minor, inconsequential procedural decisions have stood, mainly because what they sought after was already existing policy and practice.

    Playing with statistics to manufacture "evidence" is not a tool recognized in any court as "evidence". Judges appointed by both Republican and Democrat politicians have unanimously said so.

    All this blather is anti-American idiocy desperately trying to deny reality and scrap the will of the American Voters.

    Which is weird considering those very same American voters who rejected Trump simultaneously rejected many down-ballot Democrats! Think about it, to reject Trump's loss you must also reject the win of many a Republican Congressman or State legislator!
     
    Independent4ever likes this.
  20. Independent4ever

    Independent4ever Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2020
    Messages:
    3,543
    Likes Received:
    3,581
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
     
  21. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,672
    Likes Received:
    8,852
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Unresponsive as usual. Goodbye.
     
  22. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,672
    Likes Received:
    8,852
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Very improbable or statistically impossible outcomes are strong circumstantial evidence for throwing out a state election result. As is the fact that you noted, namely all Republicans winning House re-election and picking up now 12 seats. The election is not over. The SCOTUS should step in and halt certification until all the anomalies and irregularities can be heard in courts of law. Democrats should also support this as Biden will have the stench of a corrupt election process on him if this is not resolved. There will be multiple books written about this corruption in the next 12 months.
     
  23. ChiCowboy

    ChiCowboy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2015
    Messages:
    23,076
    Likes Received:
    14,142
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Says you.
    Wake up.
     
  24. AFM

    AFM Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2014
    Messages:
    36,672
    Likes Received:
    8,852
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Says the legal system with regard to civil litigation.
     
  25. Enuf Istoomuch

    Enuf Istoomuch Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2018
    Messages:
    663
    Likes Received:
    524
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Amazing, every word you just spoke was false.

    You Trumpers keep repeating the same gibberish. It is not working in front of judges. As in dozens of judges. You may dream all you like that you have found some degree of evidence. But the courts are looking at lawyers presenting these arguments with stunned disbelief they would try such an empty, evidence-free attempt to erase massive numbers of votes.

    How many dozens of times do judges have to toss out these claims with strong rebukes before you folks figure out that this is not a winning strategy?
     
    Bob0627 and bx4 like this.

Share This Page