Anti-Trumpers left frustrated by DOJ document

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by XXJefferson#51, May 25, 2021.

  1. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,939
    Likes Received:
    39,414
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    It's quite clear lack of rebuttal noted.
     
  2. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,939
    Likes Received:
    39,414
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    So what? Yes the criminal referral would be made and be presented to the House which would decide whether to impeach and remove so that could start or not do so and it would wait until he otherwise left office as happened with Clinton. The fact remians NO criminal referral was made by the office of the Special PROSECUTOR.
     
  3. Patricio Da Silva

    Patricio Da Silva Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2020
    Messages:
    32,677
    Likes Received:
    17,542
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I wasn't interested in rebutting on that one, just noting your torturous syntax. If you can't write in an articulate, elevated style ( most people can't ) no one would fault you if you just be yourself. Just a recommendation, fwiw.
     
    Last edited: May 27, 2021
  4. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,939
    Likes Received:
    39,414
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Well don't take it upon yourself to be the grammar police and waste bandwidth. Lack of an intellectual response noted again. If you want to discuss the issue then do so I have no interest in your trolling.
     
  5. Patricio Da Silva

    Patricio Da Silva Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2020
    Messages:
    32,677
    Likes Received:
    17,542
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Commenting on your torturous syntax really is not about correcting grammar. It's constructive criticism on the caliber of your writing. I was correct.

    It's about helping you from embarrassing yourself. Maybe not around here, standards are pretty low, but in more serious environments, I wouldn't admit to even knowing you with verbiage like that.

    What, you can't take constructive criticism?

    I don't think you understand what 'troll' means, given your response.
     
  6. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,939
    Likes Received:
    39,414
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Stop trolling and discuss the issues and stop embarrassing yourself with your inability to do so.

    Here I'll help you out

    They [the Congress] only changed as to whom [the person who would receive the report] he [the prosecutor] would send the determinations of his office [the report], previous [before current law] it was to the House [one of the branches of the Congress] the change in law [what the Congress passed] changed it to the Attorney General [instead of the Speaker of the House].

    If you can discuss the facts then do so.
     

Share This Page