Are no democrats smart enough too...

He has on a number of occassions criticising both Democrats and Republicans in this context. Granted he hasn’t named names in doing so.

 

Yeah, I tend to believe people with reasoned arguments over people with only one-liners as responses. So I did what you couldn't and looked up his posts going back years on this forum - his words - and found these:

So that being said Jake, I'd like to introduce you to the search function here on PF.com. Do avail yourself of it; it really helps to use that before you say something - how shall I put it? - completely wrong?

 

Can we stop for moment and consider the possibility both Democrats and Republicans are less unified in their particular ideologies than they pretend. Recent objections by some brave Republicans to the lunacy at work in the Whitehouse suggests things are really boiling below the surface on that side of the House.
On the other side I find some Democrats are stepping out in entirely new directions. Possibly as preparation for defusing Trumps bluster although even some, such as Pete Buttigieg, suggest far to much effort is spent attacking the Whitehouse only to feed Trumps ego.
Anyhow, compare this to a few other Democrat profiles.
https://peteforamerica.com/issues/?...d92f5-1c78-e911-abc4-281878391efb&ceid=428027

 

No doubt that visits to the three deciding states along with only promising to be an third Obama term cost her. Trump visited them and addressed to their problems and fears. Not Hillary. Trump visited, made 5 campaign stops in Wisconsin to Hillary's none, zero. Michigan was just as bad, six for Trump, one for Hillary. Pennsylvania was closer, 8 for Trump, 5 for Hillary. Heck, in electoral vote rich Florida, Hillary ceded that state to Trump also, 13 Trump visits, 8 for Hillary.

In short, Hillary was plain lazy. She didn't have that fire in the belly to run for the presidency. Why she ran in the first place not willing to work at it, is beyond me. Her ho humness dampen her Democratic base and that showed in reduced turnout for the Democrats.

 

Thanks, i was going to go back and search some of my posts but figured, why? These posters that usually post one liners without making the effort to verify or provide substance don’t deserve much attention.

 

Going into the presidential election, i respected hilary. After the election and to this day, i have little respect for her. Think about it, how can anyone deserve to be president when they claim all americans who support a political rival are deplorables? This alone disqualifies her.. add to this the campaign she ran, unable to sell herself and her policies, making it about her rival and how bad he is. Lastly, how she has been claiming she lost because of russia, she even lacks the character to own her mistakes. Man, thank god she didn’t win the election.

 

Actually this is the very reason uncle Joe might have a shot as his speeches actually bother to make mentions of policy.
To my fellow righties that complained about Obama..just be happy he wasn't as far left as the current batch of crazies running in 2020..at least Obama made a few moves to try and do something about illegal immigration..this current batch of candidates want to let them all in

 

^^^ He is cute!

 

"this current batch of candidates want to let them all in" is a simplistic, silly statement

 

Stuart, Mike has not been a democrat all of his life. You can argue with the fly speck on the wall all you want. And what was posted by the rw extremists above made very little sense anyway.

 

Hillary didn't "work at it" because she had an attitude that the job was hers for the taking. The DNC machine made sure she was the Dem candidate and she considered Trump an interloper with no chance of winning.

 

The OLC IS OPINION, not law. A prosecutor can certainly indict the president and let it go to the courts.

 

It was certainly a political statement in the report and it was certainly something that would’ve come from the snake Weismann.

Since no prosecutor exonerates anyone it was an unprecedented statement in the

 

None of this really matters.

The Republican conservatives are not the warriors their great grandparents and grand parents were, not even their own wishy washy parents who got beat down by the left in the 1960s. The GOP will have to gird up its collective and metaphysical loins and do battle with the Dems, who are not even the slightest bit frightened of the Republican. You are right, Blessington, the Dems are incensed, and they most certainly will unite behind a candidate for the election season.

 

There is no exoneration. The report specifically says he isn’t nkt exonerated, lol

 

The report was perfectly clear. The president was not cleared.

 

Who’s talking about the report?

 

Uh, anyone wishing to discus the topic

 

The answer is no. No they are not.

 

I have posts he made years before you joined PF where he sure sounds like someone who likes Dems and hates Reps. We call that "proof". Your turn: Where is YOUR proof that he has not been a Dem for most of his life?

Yeah - I thought so.

*snicker*

 

I have been on Boards with Mike for long, long time. He has never been a Democrat, Stuart Wolfe. Your 'proof' is laughable. Find many years ago where he says he is a Democrat. That would be proof.

 

Great way to ignore the issue!

 

I remember Dark Fury would act like that, demanding proof when he could not provide any himself.

 

you are the one who has to provide the evidence to back up your claims.

You have been proven to be a fraud, a person who just makes baseless claims without doing the work to back it up. Thanks to stuart for actually doing a bit of research, something you are too lazy to do.

 

No, I don't. You, Mike12, said you were a democrat. Stuart Wolfe gave an opinion but not evidence. You can't prove it, which makes it a baseless claim. All I have to do is point out that you have failed, that you have been proven a fraud by yourself.